Amygdalar and hippocampal theta rhythm synchronization during fear memory retrieval

Science

Volumn 301, Issue 5634, 2003, Pages 846-850

  Seidenbecher, Thomas ^a   Laxmi, T Rao ^a   Stork, Oliver ^a   Pape, Hans Christian ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; DISEASES; FREQUENCIES;

MEMORY RETRIEVAL;

NEUROLOGY;

MEMORY; RESPONSE ANALYSIS;

AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC ACTIVITY; FEAR; HIPPOCAMPUS; MEMORY; MOUSE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; THETA RHYTHM;

AMYGDALA; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSHOCK; FEAR; HIPPOCAMPUS; MALE; MEMORY; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MOTOR ACTIVITY; THETA RHYTHM;

ANIMALIA; HIPPOCAMPUS HIPPOCAMPUS;

EID: 0042027822     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1085818     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. J. E. LeDoux, Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 23, 155 (2000).
2. S. Maren, Trends Neurosci. 22, 561 (1999).
3. G. E. Schafe, K. Nader, H. T. Blair, J. E. LeDoux, Trends Neurosci. 24, 540 (2001).
4. D. Paré, D. R. Collins, J. Neurosci. 20, 2701 (2000).
5. D. Paré, D. R. Collins, J. G. Pelletier, Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 306 (2002).
6. L. Cahill, J. L. McGaugh, Trends Neurosci. 21, 294 (1998).
7. L. Cahill, Brain Res. 126, 29 (2000).
8. M. G. Packard, L. Cahill, J. L. McGaugh, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 8477 (1994).
9. Y. Ikegaya, H. Saito, K. Abe, Brain Res. 656, 157 (1994).
10. Y. Ikegaya, K. Abe, H. Saito, N. Nishiyama, J. Neurophysiol. 74, 2201 (1995).
11. I. Akirav, G. Richter-Levin, J. Neurosci. 19, 10530 (1999).
12. S. Frey, J. Bergado-Rosado, T. Seidenbecher, H.-C. Pape, J. U. Frey, J. Neurosci. 21, 3697 (2001).
13. S. Maren, M. S. Fanselow, J. Neurosci. 15, 7548 (1995).
14. A. Pitkänen, M. Pikkarainen, N. Nurminen, A. Ylinen, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 911, 369 (2000).
15. Materials and methods are available as supporting material on Science Online.
16. + and the high-frequency tone as CS-.
17. G. Buzsaki, Neuron 33, 325 (2002).
18. B. H. Bland, Prog. Neurobiol. 26, 1 (1986).
19. L. Cahill, in The Amygdala. A Functional Analysis, J. P. Aggleton, Ed. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2001), pp. 425-445.
20. + and US presentation during training only but not with respect to any parameters of the electrophysiological recordings. The CS- was used as a within-subject control. Also, although theta activity was strong in the CA1 during exploratory behavior of the conditioned animals, correlated theta activity with the LA could not be observed (Fig. 3B), providing evidence against a passive transmission of theta oscillations to the LA.
21. S. Maren, Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 76, 268 (2001).
22. S. Maren, G. Aharonov, M. S. Fanselow, Behav. Brain Res. 88, 261 (1997).
23. R. G. Phillips, J. E. LeDoux, Learn. Mem. 1, 34 (1994).
24. D. B. Willingham, Neuron 18, 5 (1997).
25. R. P. Vertes, Z. Albo, G. Viana Di Prisco, Neuroscience 104, 619 (2001).
26. D. Paré, H.-C. Pape, J. Dong, J. Neurophysiol. 74, 1179 (1995).
27. H.-C. Pape, D. Paré, R. B. Driesang, J. Neurophysiol. 79, 205 (1998).
28. D. Paré, H. Gaudreau, J. Neurosci. 16, 3334 (1996).
29. D. R. Collins, E. J. Lang, D. Paré, Neuroscience 89, 1025 (1999).
30. R. P. Vertes, B. Kocsis, Neuroscience 81, 893 (1997).
31. T. Heinbockel, H.-C. Pape, J. Neurosci. 20, RC68 (2000).
32. We thank A. Reupsch for histology, E. Friedel for animal care, R. Narayanan for help in contextual conditioning and K. Fischer for help with the Matlab software. Supported by the Kultusministerium des Landes Sachsen-Anhalt and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 426, TP B7; Leibniz-Program to H.-C.P.).