Radiology scheduling: Preferences of users of radiologic services and impact on referral base and extension

Academic Radiology

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 908-913

  Mozumdar, Biswita C ^a,b   Hornsby, Douglas Neal ^a   Gogate, Adheet S ^a   Intriere, Lisa A ^a   Hanson, Richard ^a   McGreal, Karen ^a   Kelly, Pauline ^a   Ros, Pablo ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic order entry; Scheduling; Telephone

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL SERVICE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TELEPHONE; TIME MANAGEMENT;

EID: 0042026833     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)00002-3     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Seltzer SE, Gillis AE, Chiango BF, et al. Marketing CT and MR imaging services in a large urban teaching hospital. Radiology 1992; 183:529-534.
2. Smith B. What works: scheduling. So long, logbooks. Health Manag Technol 2001; 22:52-53.
3. Woods L. What works: scheduling. Picture perfect solution. The right technology and an ASP solution bring scheduling efficiency and added revenue to a community hospital's radiology department. Health Manag Technol 2001; 22:48-50.
4. Arenson R. Why bother with a computerized scheduling system? J Digit Imaging 1988; 1:24-27.
5. Bauman RA. The registration and scheduling processes. Radiol Clin North Am 1986; 24:5-9.