Incentive compensation in the public sector: Evidence and potential

Journal of Labor Research

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 597-619

  Lewin, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042026356     PISSN: 01953613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12122-003-1016-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. City of Los Angeles. Report of the Mayor's General Manager Performance Appraisal Task Force. Los Angeles: City of Los Angeles, Department of Personnel, 1995.
2. County of Orange, California. The Management Performance Plan (MPP) in the County of Orange, Santa Ana, Calif.: County of Orange, Department of Human Resources, 1998.
3. Dunlop, John. T. Wage Determination Under Trade Unions. New York: Macmillan, 1944.
4. Flannery, Thomas P., David A. Hofrichter, and Paul E. Platten. People, Performance and Pay. New York: Free Press, 1996.
5. Fogel, Water and David Lewin. "Wage Determination in the Public Sector." Industrial and Labor Relations Review 27 (April 1974): 410-31.
6. Gaebler, Theodore and David Osborne. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming The Public Sector. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
7. Gerhart, Barry, George T. Milkovich, and Brian Murray. "Pay, Performance, and Participation," In David Lewin, Olivia S. Mitchell, and Peter D. Sherer, eds. Research Frontiers in Industrial Relations and Human Resources. Madison, Wise.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1992, pp. 193-238.
8. Ingraham, Patricia W. "Of Pigs in Pokes and Policy Diffusion: Another Look at Pay-for-Performance." Public Administration Review 53 (March/April 1997): 348-56.
9. Kellough, J. Edward and Sally Coleman Selden. "Pay for Performance Systems in State Government." Review of Public Personnel Administration 17 (Winter 1997): 5-21.
10. Kotler, Philip. Marketing Management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1991.
11. Lawler, Edward E., III. Rewarding Excellence: Pay Strategies for the New Economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
12. Levine, Hermine Zagat. "New Strategies for Public Pay: Rethinking Government Compensation Programs." Compensation and Benefits Review 29 (November/December 1997): 75-87.
13. Lewin, David. "Incentive Compensation in the U.S. Public Sector: A Study of Usage, Perceptions and Preferences." Paper presented at 54th Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, Atlanta, Ga., 2002.
14. _. "Public Sector Concession Bargaining: Lessons for the Private Sector." Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association. Madison, Wisc.: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1982, pp. 383-93.
15. _. "Technological Change in the Public Sector: The Case of Sanitation Service." In Daniel B. Cornfield, ed. Workers, Managers, and Technological Change: Emerging Patterns of Labor Relations. New York: Plenum, 1987, pp. 281-309.
16. _. "Aspects of Wage. Determination in Local Government Employment." Public Administration Review 34 (March/April 1974a): 149-55.
17. _. "The Prevailing Wage Principle and Public Wage Decisions." Public Personnel Management 3 (November-December 1974b): 473-485.
18. _, Peter Feuille, Thomas A. Kochan, and John T. Delaney. Public Sector Labor Relations: Analysis and Readings. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington. 1988.
19. "Morning Briefing: Santa Monica Adopts Living Wage Law." Los Angeles Times, October 4, 2000.
20. Loverd, Richard A. and Thomas J. Pavlak. "The Historical Development of the American Civil Service." In Jack Rabin, Thomas Vocino, W. Bartley Hildreth, and Gerald J. Miller, eds. Handbook on Public Personnel Administration and Labor Relations. New York: Dekker, 1983, pp. 245-87.
21. Meehan, Robert H. "Strategic Total Compensation Planning in the Public Sector." Compensation and Benefits Management 1 (Summer 1991): 10-17.
22. Milkovich, George T. and Jerry M. Newman. Compensation. Burr Ridge, I111.: Irwin/MCGraw-Hill, 1999.
23. Milkovich, George and J. Stevens. "From Pay to Rewards: 100 Years of Change." American Compensation Association Journal 9 (First Quarter 2000): 6-18.
24. Mitchell, Daniel J.B., David Lewin, and Edward E. Lawler. "Alternative Pay Systems, Firm Performance, and Productivity." In Alan S. Blinder, ed. Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1990, pp. 15-88.
25. Newlin, Joseph G. and G. Jonathan Meng. "The Public Sector Pays for Performance." Personnel Journal 70 (October 1991): 110-14.
26. Risher, Howard W. "Are Public Employers Ready for a 'New Pay' Program?" Public Personnel Management 28 (Fall 1999): 323-43.
27. _. "The Search for a New Model for Salary Management: Is There Support for Private Sector Practices?" Public Personnel Management 26 (Winter 1997): 431-39.
28. _. "The Emerging Model for Salary Management in the Private Sector: Is It Relevant to Government?" Public Personnel Management 23 (Winter 1994): 649-65.
29. _, Charles H. Fay, and Alan Shrader. New Strategies for Public Pay: Rethinking Government Compensation Programs. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1997.
30. Siegel, Gilbert B. Public Employee Compensation and Its Role in Public Sector Strategic Management. New York: Quorum, 1992.
31. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Monthly Labor Review 123 (February 2000): p. 96, Table 6.
32. Vroom, Victor. Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley, 1964.
33. Wise, Lois Recascino. "Factors Affecting the Size of Performance Awards among Mid-Level Civil Servants in the United States." Public Administration Quarterly 18 (Fall 1994): 260-78.