Pressure recovery in pediatric aortic valve stenosis

Pediatric Cardiology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 457-462

  Villavicencio, R E ^a   Forbes, T J ^a   Thomas, R L ^b   Humes, R A ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Children's Research Center of Michigan   (United States)

Author keywords

Aortic valve stenosis; Pediatrics; Pressure recovery

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ANALYTIC METHOD; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PREDICTION; PRESSURE RECOVERY; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TRANSLUMINAL VALVULOPLASTY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADOLESCENT; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE;

EID: 0042021762     PISSN: 01720643     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00246-002-0361-7     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, Maurer G (1990) Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro: a manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 82:1467-1475
2. Baumgartner H, Schima H, Tulzer G, Kühn P (1993) Effect of stenosis geometry on the Doppler-catheter gradient relation in vitro: manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 21:1018-1025
3. Baumgartner H, Stefenelli T, Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G (1999) "Overestimation" of catheter gradients by Doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:1655-1661
4. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1:307-311
5. Cape E, Jones M, Yamada I, Van Auker M, Valdes-Cruz L (1996) Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis: the role of the Reynolds number. Circulation 94:2975-2981
6. Clark C (1976) The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis: I. Theory and steady flow experiments. J Biomech 9:521-528
7. Clark C (1976) The fluid mechanics of aortic stenosis: II. Unsteady flow experiments. J Biomech 9:567-573
8. Currie P, Seward J, Reeder G, et al. (1985) Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 71:1162-1169
9. Gutgesell HP, French M (1991) Echocardiographic determination of aortic and pulmonary valve areas in subjects with normal hearts. Am J Cardiol 68:773-776
10. Heinrich RS, Fontaine AA, Grimes RY, et al. (1996) Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery. Ann Biomed Eng 24:685-694
11. Laskey W, Kussmaul W (1994) Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 89:116-121
12. Lemler MS, Valdes-Cruz LM, Shandas RS, Cape EG. Insights into catheter/Doppler discrepancies in congenital aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 83:1447-1450
13. Levine R, Jimoh A, Cape E, et al. (1989) Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient "overestimation" by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 13:706-715
14. Lima VC, Zahn E, Houche C, et al. (2000) Non-invasive determination of the systolic peak to peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model. Cardiol Young 2:115-119
15. Neiderberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (1996) Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound: role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 94:1934-1940
16. Ohlsson J, Wranne B (1986) Noninvasive assessment of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 7:501-508
17. Schöbel WA, Voelker W, Haase KK, Karsch KR (1999) Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 20:1355-1363
18. Sung HW, Yu PS, Hsu CH, Hsu JC (1997) Can cardiac catheterization accurately assess the severity of aortic stenosis? An in vitro pulsatile flow study. Ann Biomed Eng 25:896-905
19. Voelker W, Reul H, Stelzer T, Schmidt A, Karsch K (1992) Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model. J Am Coll Cardiol 120:1585-1593