Visual Search Asymmetry in Pigeons

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 118-129

  Pearce, John M ^a   George, David N ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLUMBA;

ANIMAL; APPETITE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGEONS AND DOVES;

ANIMALS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; COLUMBIDAE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 0042021431     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.29.2.118     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allan, S. E., & Blough, D. E. (1989). Feature-based search asymmetries in pigeons and humans. Perception and Psychophysics, 46, 456-464.
2. Blough, D. S., & Blough, P. M. (1997). Form perception and attention in pigeons. Animal Learning a Behavior, 25, 1-20.
3. Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1951). A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination, Psychological Review, 58, 413-423.
4. Cook, R. G. (1992a). Acquisition and transfer of visual texture discriminations by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 341-353.
5. Cook, R. G. (1992b). Dimensional organization and texture discrimination in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 354-363.
6. Cook, R. G., Cavoto, K. K., & Cavoto, B. R. (1996). Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination. Animal Learning & Behavior, 24, 150-167.
7. Gluck, M. A. (1991). Stimulus generalization and representation in adaptive network models of category learning. Psychological Science, 2, 50-55.
8. Jenkins, H. M., & Sainsbury, R. S. (1969). The development of stimulus control through differential reinforcement. In N. J. Mackintosh & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Fundamental issues in associative learning (pp. 123-161). Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Dalhousie University Press.
9. Northdurft, H. C. (1992). Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive attention. Perception and Psychophysics, 52, 355-375.
10. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
11. Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 101, 587-607.
12. Snowden, R. J. (1992). Texture segregation and visual search: A comparison of the effects of random variations along irrelevant dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1354-1367.
13. Treisman, A. (1985). Preattentive processing in vision. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 31, 156-177.
14. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
15. Treisman, A., & Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
16. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1985). Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 285-310.
17. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352.
18. Wolfe, J. M. (1992). "Effortless" texture segmentation and "parallel" visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research, 32, 757-763.