Perinatal care at the threshold of viability - From principles to practice

Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 362-375

  Ho, Lai Yun ^a  

^a SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Ethical dilemmas and issues; Extremely low birth weight infant; Perinatal counselling; Withdrawal and withholding of life sustaining treatment

Indexed keywords

AUTHORITY; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DECISION MAKING; DELIVERY; DISABILITY; ETHICS; EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; FAMILY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PARENT; PERINATAL CARE; PHYSICIAN; PROGNOSIS; REVIEW; RISK; SOCIAL ASPECT; SURVIVAL;

EID: 0042018716     PISSN: 03044602     EISSN: 29724066     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Lemons J A, Bauer C R, Oh W, Korones S B, Papile L A, Stoll B J, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics 2000; 117E1.
2. Wood N S, Marlow N, Costeloe K, Gibson A T, Wilkinson A R. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICureStudy Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:378-84.
3. Vohr B R, Wright L L, Dusick A M, Mele L, Verter J, Steichen J J, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993-1994. Pediatrics 2000; 105:1216-26.
4. Hack M, Friedman H, Fanaroff A A. Outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1996; 98:931-7.
5. Emsley H C, Wardle S P, Sims D G, Chiswick M L, D'Souza S W. Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990-4 compared with 1984-9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 78:F99-104.
6. The Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Improved outcome into the 1990s for infants weighing 500-999 g at birth. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1997; 77:F91-4.
7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin. Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists. Perinatal Care at the Threshold of Viability. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100:612-24.
8. Allen M C, Donohue P K, Dunsman A E. The limit of viability-neonatal outcome of infants born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestation. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1597-1601.
9. Chervenak F A, McMullough L B. The limits of viability. J Perinatal Med 1997; 25:418-20.
10. Morrison J J, Rennie J M. Clinical, scientific and ethical aspects of fetal and neonatal care at extremely preterm periods of gestation. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104:1341-50.
11. Rennie J M. Perinatal management at the lower margin of viability. Arch Dis Child 1996; 74:F214-8.
12. Lorenz J M. Survival of the extremely preterm infants in North America in the 1990s. Clin Perinatol 2000; 27:255-62.
13. Nishida H. The viability limit of gestation of the fetus and premature neonate - the effect of the recent Amendment of Eugenic Protection Act in Japan. Asian Med J 1992; 35:487-94.
14. Shaffer T H, Wolfson M R. Principles and application of liquid breathing: water babies revisited. In: Fanaroff A A, Klaus M H, editors. Year Book of Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine 1992. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book, 1992:xv-xxxiii.
15. British Association of Perinatal Medicine. Fetuses and Newborn Infants at the Threshold of Viability. A Framework for Practice [memorandum, July 2000]. Available at URL: http://www.bapm.org/documents/publications/threshold.pdf
16. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, Ethics Advisory Committee. Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-saving Treatment in Children: A Framework for Practice. London: Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1997.
17. Sanders M R, Donohue P K, Oberdorf M A, Rosenkrantz T S, Allen M C. Perceptions of the limit of viability: Neonatologists' attitudes toward extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol 1995; 15:494-502.
18. Young E, Stevenson D. Limiting treatment for extremely premature, low birthweight infants (500-750 g). Am J Dis Child 1990; 144:549-52.
19. Fetal extrauterine survivability: Report of the Committee on Fetal Extrauterine Survivability to the New York State Task Force on Life and the Law. Albany: New York State Task Force on Life and the Law, January 1988.
20. Fetus and Newborn Committee, Canadian Paediatric Society, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada: Management of the woman with threatened birth of an infant of extremely low gestational age. Can Med Assoc J 1994; 151:547-53.
21. Fanaroff A A, Wright L L, Stevenson D K, Shankaran S, Donovan E F, Ehrenkranz R A, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, May 1991 through December 1992. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173:1423-31.
22. Stevenson D K, Wright L L, Lemmons J A, Oh W, Korones S B, Papile L A, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1993 to December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 1632-9.
23. Synnes A R, Ling E W Y, Whitfield M F, Mackinnon M, Lopez L, Wong G, et al. Perinatal outcomes of a large cohort of extremely low birth weight infants (twenty-three to twenty-eight completed weeks of gestation). J Pediatr 1994; 125:952-60.
24. Hack M, Wright L L, Shankaran S, Tyson J E, Horbar J D, Bauer C R, et al. Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, November 1989 to October 1990. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172:457-64.
25. Tyson J E, Younes N, Verter J, Wright L L. Viability, mortality, and resource use among newborns of 501-800 g birth weight. JAMA 1996; 276:1645-51.
26. Hadlock F P, Harrist R B, Sharman R S, Deter R I, Park S K. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, and femur measurements - a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 151:333-7.
27. Bottoms S F, Paul R H, Mercer B M, Iams J D. Obstetric determinations of neonatal survival: influence of willingness to perform cesarean delivery on survival of extremely low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176:960-6.
28. Kitchen W H, Ford G W, Doyle L W, Rickard A L, Lissenden J V, Pepperell A J, et al. Cesarean section or vaginal delivery at 24 to 26 weeks' gestation: comparison of survival and neonatal and two-year morbidity. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:149-57.
29. Fost N. Ethical issues in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Pediatr Ann 1981; 10:383-7.
30. Strain J E. The decision to forego life-sustaining treatment for seriously ill newborns. Pediatrics 1983; 72:572-3.
31. Rhoden N. Treating Baby Doe: the ethics of neonatology. Hastings Cent Rep 1986; 16:34-42.
32. Yu V Y H. The extremely low birthweight infant: Ethical issues in treatment. Aust Paediatr J 187; 23:97-103.
33. The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: Deciding to Forego Life-sustaining Treatment. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1983.
34. Wall S N, Partridge J C. Death in the intensive care nursery: Physician practice of withdrawing and withholding life-support. Pediatrics 1997; 99:64-70.
35. Fleischman A R. Bioethical review committees in perinatology. Clin Perinatol 1987; 14:379-93.
36. Partridge J C, Wall S N. Analgesia for dying infants whose life support is withdrawn or withheld. Pediatrics 1997; 99:76-9
37. Miraie E D, Mahowald M B. Withholding nutrition from seriously ill newborn infants: A parent's perspective. J Pediatr 1988; 113:262-5.
38. Kinlaw K. The changing nature of neonatal ethics in practice. Clin Perinatol 1996; 23:417-28.
39. Harrison H. The principles for family-centered neonatal care. Pediatrics 1993; 92:643-50.
40. Muraskas J, Marshall P A, Tomich P, Myers T F, Gianopoulos J G, Thomasma D C. Neonatal viability in the 1990s: held hostage by technology. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 1999; 8:160-70.
41. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn: The initiation or withdrawal of treatment for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics 1995; 96:362-3.
42. Fost N, Cranford R. Hospital ethics committees: administrative aspects. JAMA 1985; 255:2687-92.
43. Campbell A G M. Some ethical issues in neonatal care. In: Dunstan G R, Shinebourne E A, editors. Doctors' Decisions. Ethical Conflicts in Medical Practice. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press, 1989.