Acceptance of groupware: The relationships among use, satisfaction, and outcomes

Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 173-190

  Lou, Hao ^a   Scamell, Richard W ^b  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Acceptance; Computer mediated communication systems; Groupware; Lotus Notes

Indexed keywords

EID: 0042002131     PISSN: 10919392     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10919399609540275     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. S.R. Hiltz and K. Johnson, "Measuring acceptance of computer-mediated communication systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 386-397, 1989.
2. R. Johansen, Groupware: Computer Support for Business Teams. New York: Free Press, 1988.
3. D. Kirkpatrick. "Why Microsoft can't stop Lotus Notes," Fortune, pp. 141-157, Dec. 12, 1994.
4. R. Johansen, D. Sibbet, S. Benson, A. Martin, B. Mittman, and P. Saffo, Leading Business Teams. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1991.
5. C.V. Bullen and J.L Bennett, "Groupware in practice: An interpretation of work experience," CISR WP No. 205. Center for Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1990.
6. J. Grudin, "Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces," Proc. ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1988, pp. 85-92.
7. R. Kling, "Cooperation, coordination, and control in computer-supported work," Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 83-88, 1991.
8. W.E. Mackay, "Diversity in the use of electronic mail," ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 380-397, 1988.
9. L.S. Sproull and S. Kiesler, "Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication," Management Science, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1492-1512, 1986.
10. R.E. Rice and D. Shook, "Access to, usage of, and outcomes from an electronic messaging system," ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 255-276, 1988.
11. W.J. Orlikowski, "Learning from Notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation," Proc. ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, 1992, pp. 362-369.
12. F. Williams, R.E. Rice, and E.M. Rogers, Research Methods and the New Media. New York: Free Press, 1988.
13. S.R. Hiltz and K. Johnson, "User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems," Management Science, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 739-764, 1990.
14. S.H. Komsky, "A profile of users of electronic mail in a university: Frequent versus occasional users," Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 310-340, 1991.
15. T. Bikson, K. Gutek, and D.A. Martin, Implementation of Information Technology in Office Settings: Reviews of Relevant Literature. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1981.
16. E. Bardach, The Implementation Game, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1977.
17. R.K. Yin, Changing Urban Bureaucracies: How New Practice Becomes Routinized. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 1978.
18. E. Bardach, "On designing implementable programs," in Pitfalls of Analysis, G. Majone and E.S. Quade, Eds. New York: Wiley, 1980, pp. 138-158.
19. F. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 318-340, 1989.
20. E.B. Kerr and S.R. Hiltz, Computer-Mediated Communication Systems: Status and Evaluation. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
21. R. Johansen, R. DeGrasse, and T. Wilson, Group Communication Through Computers, Vol. 5, Effects on Working Patterns. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future, 1975.
22. S. Kiesler, J. Siegel, and T. McGuire, "Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication," American Psychologist, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1123-1134, 1984.
23. R.E. Rice and D. Case, "Computer-mediated messaging in the university: A description of use and utility," Journal of Communication, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 131-152, 1983.
24. C.W. Steinfield, "Computer-mediated communication in an organizational setting: Explaining task-related and socioemotional uses," in Communication Yearbook 9, M. McLaughlin, Ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1986.
25. R.E. Rice and C. Borgman, "The use of computer-monitored data in information science and communication research," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, vol. 34, no.1, pp. 247-256, 1983.
26. R.W. Zmud, "Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature," Management Science, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 966-979, 1979.
27. B. Ives, H. Olson, and J. Baroudi, "The measurement of user information satisfaction," Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 785-793, 1983.
28. J. Baroudi, B. Ives, and H. Olson, "An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction," Communications of the ACM, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 232-238, 1986.
29. J.E. Bailey, and S.W. Pearson, "Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction," Management Science, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 519-523, 1983.
30. A.M. Jenkins and J.A. Ricketts, "The development of a MIS satisfaction questionnaire: An instrument for evaluating user satisfaction with turnkey decision support systems," Working Paper. University of Houston, 1986.
31. W.J. Doll and G. Torkzadeh, "The measurement of end user computing satisfaction," Management Information System Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 51-61, 1988.
32. G.L. Sanders, "MIS/DSS success measure," Systems, Objectives, Solutions, vol. 5, pp. 29-34, 1984.
33. R.E. Rice, "Computer conferencing," in Progress in Communication Sciences, vol. 2, B. Dervin and M. Voigt, Eds. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1980, p. 215.
34. R.E. Rice, D. Hughes, and G. Love, "Usage and outcomes of electronic messaging at an R&D organization: Situational constraints, job level, and media awareness," Office: Technology and People, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 141-146, 1989.
35. R.E. Rice, "Computer-mediated communication and organizational communication," Journal of Communication, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 65-94, 1987.
36. C. Atkin, "Instrumental utilities and information seeking," in New Models for Mass Communication Research, P. Clark, Ed. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1973, pp. 205-245.
37. G.C. Edwards, An Analysis of Usage and Related Perceptions of NLS - A Computer-Based Text Processing and Communication System. Montreal: Bell Canada Headquarters, Business Development, 1977.
38. L. Sproull, "Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research," Academy of Management Journal, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 159-169, 1986.
39. S. Kiesler and L. Sproull, "Response effects in the electronic survey," Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 402-413, 1986.
40. R.E. Rice, S.J. Chang, and J. Torobin, "Communication style, media use, organizational level, and use and evaluation of electronic messaging," Management Communication Quarterly, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 3-33, 1992.
41. J.S. Ettema, "Explaining information system use with system-monitored vs. self-reported use measures," Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 381-387, 1985.
42. J. Vallee, R. Johansen, H. Lipinski, K. Spangler, and T. Wilson, Group Communication through Computers, Vol. 4: Social, Managerial, and Economic Issues. Menlo Park, CA: Institute for the Future. 1978.
43. T.D. Cook and D.T. Campbell, Quasi-Experimentation Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings: Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
44. L.J. Cronbach, "Coefficients alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 297-334, 1951.
45. L.J. Cronbach, Essentials of Psychological Testing, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row, 1971.
46. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1978.
47. F.N. Kerlinger, Foundation of Behavioral Research, 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 1973.
48. C. O'Reilly and L. Pondy, "Organizational communication," in Organizational Behavior, S. Kerr, Ed. Columbus, OH: Grid, 1979, pp. 119-150.
49. R. Panko, "Electronic mail: The alternatives," Office Administration and Automation, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 37-43, 1984.
50. L.M. Applegate, "Technology support for cooperative work: A framework for studying introduction and assimilation in organizations," Journal of Organizational Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11-39, 1991.
51. L. Trevino, R.L. Daft, and R.H. Lengel, "Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective," in Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, pp. 71-94.
52. J. Fulk, J. Schmitz, and C.W. Steinfield, "A social influence model of technology use in organizations," in Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, pp. 117-140.
53. M.L. Markus, "Toward a critical mass theory of interactive media," in Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C. Steinfield, Eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990, pp. 194-218.