New technologies, new literacies: Focus discipline research and ESL learning communities

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 105-128

  Kasper, Loretta F ^a  

^a KINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041993363     PISSN: 10943501     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1983a). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983b). A spreading activation theory of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 261-295.
3. Benesch, S. (1988). Ending remediation: Linking ESL and content in higher education. Washington, DC: TESOL.
4. Brinton, D. M., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (1989). Content-based second language instruction. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
5. Brown, G. (2000, January/February). Where do we go from here? The Technology Source. Retrieved January 5, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://horizon.unc.edu/TS/reading/2000-01.asp.
6. Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative learning: Higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
8. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1997). Research on text comprehension in multimedia environments.Language Learning and Technology, 1(1), 60-81. Retrieved July 15, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num1/chun_plass/default.html.
9. College Board. (1978). Descriptive test of language skills (DTLS).
10. Crandall, J. (1993). Diversity as challenge and resource. In Proceedings on the Conference on ESL Students in the CUNY Classroom: Faculty Strategies for Success (pp. 4-19). New York: CUNY.
11. Cranton, P. (1996). Professional development as transformative learning: New perspectives for teachers of adults. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Crook, C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
13. Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students. Los Angeles, CA: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
14. Cummins, J., & Sayers, D. (1995). Brave new schools: Challenging cultural illiteracy through global learning networks. New York: St. Martin's Press.
15. CUNY Task Force on Writing. (1983). The CUNY Writing Skills Assessment Test: Short essays evaluated and annotated by the CUNY Task Force on Writing. New York: CUNY Task Force on Writing.
16. Devine, J. (1993). The role of metacognition in second language reading and writing. In J. G.Carson & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 105-127). Boston: Heinle and Heinle.
17. Devine, J., Railey, K., & Boshoff, P. (1993). The implications of cognitive models in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 203-225.
18. Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R. S., & Smith, B. L. (1990). Learning communities: Creating connections among students, faculty, and disciplines. New directions for teaching and learning, No. 41. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19. Horowitz, D. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 445-462.
20. Imel, S. (1998). Teaching critical reflection. ERIC Trends and Issues Alerts (00071). Retrieved May 17, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://ericacve.org/docs/tia00071.htm.
21. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Kahn, T. (1999, Spring). Designing virtual communities for creativity and learning. Edutopia Retrieved April 27, 1999 from the World Wide Web: http://www.glef.org/edutopia/newsletters/6.2/kahn.html.
23. Kasper, L. F. (1997a). The impact of content-based instructional programs on the academic progress of ESL students. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 309-320.
24. Kasper, L. F. (1997b). Assessing the metacognitive growth of ESL student writers. TESL-EJ, 3(1). Retrieved January 6, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www-writing.berkeley.edu/TESL-EJ/ej09/a1.html.
25. Kasper, L. F. (1998a). ESL and the Internet: Content, rhetoric, and research. In W. E. Tanner & S. S. Webb (Eds.), Proceedings of Rhetoric and Technology in the Next Millennium [CD-ROM]. Mesquite, TX: Caxton's Modern Art Press. Retrieved January 6, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://members.aol.com/Drlfk/rhetoric.html.
26. Kasper, L. F. (1998b). Meeting ESL students' academic needs through discipline-based instructional programs. In T. Smoke (Ed.), Adult ESL: Politics, pedagogy and participation in classroom and community programs (pp. 147-157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Kasper, L. F. (1998c). Interdisciplinary English (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Kasper, L. F. (2000a). Content-based college ESL instruction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Kasper. L. F. (2000b). Sustained content study and the Internet: Developing functional and academic literacies. In M. Pally (Ed.), Sustained content-based teaching in academic ESL/EFL: A practical approach (pp. 54-73). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30. Kellogg, R. T. (1994). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford.
31. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
32. Leki, I., & Carson, J. G. (1994). Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines. TESOL Quarterly, 28(1), 81-101.
33. Luke, A., & Elkins, J. (1998). Reinventing literacy in "New Times." Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42(1), 4-7.
34. McGrath, B. (1998, April). Partners in learning: Twelve ways technology changes the teacher-student relationship. T.H.E. Journal. Retrieved May 16, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A1982.cfm.
35. Mohan, B. (1990, September). LEP students and the integration of language and content: Knowledge structures and tasks. In Proceedings of the research symposium onlimited English proficient students' issues (pp. 113-160). Washington, DC: Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Language Affairs.
36. Moll, L. C. (1994). Literacy research in community and classrooms: A sociocultural approach. In R.B. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 4th edition (pp. 179-207). Newark, DE: IRA.
37. Neilsen, L. (1989). Literacy and living: The literate lives of three adults. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann/Boynton-Cook.
38. Nelson, G., & Schmid, T. (1989). ESL reading: Schema theory and standardized tests. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 539-543.
39. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
40. Pally, M. (1997). Critical thinking in ESL: An argument for sustained content. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6(3), 293-311.
41. Pally, M. (Ed.). (2000). Sustained content-based teaching in academic ESL/EFL: A practical approach. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
42. Rouet, J. F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with hypertext: Empirical studies and their implications. In J. F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R. J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9-23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Scholfield, P. (1995). Quantifying language. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
44. Shetzer, H. (1998, March). Electronic literacies: Bridging the gap. Paper presented at the 1998 conference of Teachers of Speakers of Other Languages, Seattle, WA. Retrieved July 21, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.eslplanet.com/tesol98/literacy/electlit.html.
45. Short, D. J. (1993). Assessing integrated language and content instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 627-656.
46. Snow, M. A., & Brinton, D. B. (Eds.). (1997). The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content. New York: Longman.
47. Snow, M. A., Met, M., & Genesee, F. (1989). A conceptual framework for the integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 201-217.
48. Soter, A. O. (1990). The non-English-speaking student. In G. E. Hawisher & A. O. Soter (Eds.), On literacy and its teaching (pp. 224-242). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
49. Spanos, G. (1989). On the integration of language and content information. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 227-240.
50. Sproull, L. (1998, November 12). A database is not a community: Important social dynamics in online groups. Keynote address presented at WebNet '98, Orlando, FL.
51. Tierney, R. J., Kieffer, R., Whalin, K., Desai, L., Moss, A. G., Harris, J. E., & Hopper, J. (1997, May). Assessing the impact of hypertext on learners' architecture of literacy learning spaces in different disciplines: Follow-up studies. Reading Online. Retrieved May 21, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.readingonline.org/research/impact.
52. Ullman, C. (1997). Social identity and the adult ESL classroom. ERIC Digest (EDO-LE-98-101). Retrieved May 28, 1999, from the World Wide Web:http://www.cal.org/ncle/digests/Socident.htm.
53. United States Department of Education (1995, August). Technology supports for project-based learning. Technology and Education Reform: Technical Research Report Retrieved May 16, 1999, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/SER/Technology/ch8.html.
54. Warschauer, M. (1999). Electronic literacies: Language, culture, and power in online education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Zuengler, J., & Brinton, D. (1997). Linguistic form, pragmatic function: Relevant research from content-based instruction. In M. Snow & D. Brinton (Eds.), The content-based classroom: Perspectives on integrating language and content (pp. 263-273). White Plains, NY: Longman.