Research, technology assessment, and quality assurance

European Journal of General Practice

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 162-165

  Olesen, Frede ^a   Mainz, Jan ^a   Lassen, Jens Flensted ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041980295     PISSN: 13814788     EISSN: 17511402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/13814789609161557     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. WHO. Regional office for Europe. Health for all. Copenhagen, 1984.
2. Worning AM, Mainz J, Klazinga N, Gøttile JK, Johansen KS. Policy on quality development for the medical profession. Ugeskr Laeger 1992; 154: 3523-33.
3. Grol R, Wensing M, Jacobs A, Baker R. Quality assurance in gen-eral practice. The state of the art in Europe. Utrecht: NHG, 1993.
4. Donabedian A. Quality assessment and assurance. Unity of purpose, diversity of mean. Inquiry 1988; 25: 173-92.
5. Donabedian A. The assessment of technology and quality. Int J Tech- nol Assess Health Care 1988; 4: 487-96.
6. Palmer RH, Donabedian A, Povar GJ. Striving for quality in health care. Ann Harbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press, 1991.
7. Donabedian A. Perspectives on quality and value. Quality and cost: choices and responsibilities. J Occup Med 1990; 32: 1167-72.
8. WHO. Regional office for Europe. Quality Assurance of Health Services. Copenhagen, 1982.
9. Donabedian A. The criteria and standards of quality. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Health Administration Press, 1982.
10. Donabedian A. The quality of medical care. Science 1987; 200: 85664.
11. Proctor SJ. Why clinical research needs medical audit [editorial]. Quality in Health Care 1993; 2: 1-2.
12. Grol R, Mokkink H, Schellevis F. The effects of peer review in general practice. J R Coll Gen Pract 1988; 38:10-3.
13. Peterson OL, Andrews LP, Spain RS, Greenberg BG. An analytic study of North Carolina General Practice. J Med Educ 1956; 31: 1-165.
14. Delbecq A, Ven A van de. A group process model for problem identification and program planning. J Appl Behav Sci 1971; 7: 467-92.
15. Glaser EM. Using behavioral science strategies for defining the State of Art. J Appl Behav Sci 1980; 16: 79-92.
16. Bond S, Bond J. A Delphi study of clinical nursing research priorities. J Adv Nurs 1982; 7: 565-75.
17. Donabedian A. The epidemiology of quality. Inquiry 1985; 22: 282-92.
18. Palmer RH. Confronting special implementation issues: The epidemiology of quality problems. In: Donaldson Ms, Harris-Wehling J, Lohr KN, editors. Medicare: New directions in quality assurance: Proceedings of an invitational conference by the Institute of Medicine Division of Health Care Services. Washington: National Academy Press, 1991: 96-104.
19. Donabedian A. Quality assurance .in health care: Consumers' role. Quality in Health Care 1992; 1: 247-51.
20. Wensing M, Grol R, Smits A. Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: A literature analysis. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 45-53.