Core articles: Confused expectations: Decentralizing the management of EU programmes

Public Money and Management

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 83-92

  Levy, Roger ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041974598     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: 14679302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2003.10874829     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Apter, D. (1965), The Politics of Modernization (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
2. Common, R., Flynn, N. and Mellon, E. (1992), Managing Public Services: Competition and Decentralization (Butterworth, Oxford).
3. Court of Auditors (1996), Annual report concerning the financial year 1995 with the institutions’ replies. Official journal of the European Communities, OJ C340, 39 (12 November 1996).
4. Dunleavy, P. (1994), The globalization of public services production: Can government be ‘best in world’? Public Policy and Administration, 9, 2, pp. 36-64.
5. EC (1999), Designing Tomorrow’s Commission: A Review of the Commission’s Organization and Operation (Brussels).
6. EC (1999a), Reform of the Structural Funds 2000-2006, Comparative Analysis (Brussels).
7. EC (1999b), The PHARE Programme: Annual Report 1998 (Brussels).
8. EC (2000), Reforming the Commission: A White Paper—Part I (Brussels).
9. EC (2000a), Reforming the Commission: A White Paper—Part II (Brussels).
10. EC (2000b), Progress Report on the Reform Actions as at 10 July 2000 (Brussels).
11. EC (2000c), Communication from the Commission: Externalization of the Management of Community Programmes—Proposal for a Council Regulation, COM (2000) 788 final (Brussels).
12. EC (2000d), Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament Concerning the Development of the External Service, COM (2000) 456 final (Brussels).
13. EC (2001), European Governance: A White Paper, COM (2001) 428 (Brussels).
14. EC (2001 a), Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The Results of the Programming of the Structural Funds 2000-06, COM (2001)378 final (Brussels).
15. EC (2001b), The Development of the External Service: Communication from the Commission, COM (2001) 381 final (Brussels).
16. EC (200lc), Reform Progress Report—February 2001, COM (2001) 115 final (Brussels).
17. EC (2001d), Commission will Fully Implement ABM by 2004, Memo/01/278 (Brussels).
18. European Parliament, Committee on Budgetary Control (2000), Report on Action to be Taken on the Second Report of the Committee of Independent Experts on the Reform of the Commission (Brussels).
19. European Parliament (2000a), Committee on Budgets, Report on the White Paper on Reforming the Commission (Brussels).
20. European Parliament (2000b), Committee on Constitutional Affairs, Report on the White Paper on Reforming the Commission (Brussels).
21. Evaluation Partnership (1999), Evaluation of the Implementation and Results of SEM 2000 and its Contribution to the Overall Management Reform of the Commission (European Commission, Brussels).
22. Hood, C. (1991), A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 1, pp. 3-19.
23. Hood, C. (1995), Emerging issues in public administration. Public Administration, 73, 1, pp. 165-183.
24. Hooghe, L. (2001), The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).
25. Kinnock, N. (2002), Accountability and reform of internal control in the Commission. Political Quarterly, 73, 1, pp. 21-28.
26. Levy, R. (1996), Managing VFM audit in the EU: The challenge of diversity. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34, 4, pp. 509-529.
27. Levy, R (1998), Re-engineering audit and performance management for multi-level governance: The EU experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64, 1, pp. 55-71.
28. Levy, R. (1999), (Ed), Managing, Monitoring and Evaluating the EU Budget: Internal and External Perspectives (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht).
29. Levy, R. (2000), Implementing European Union Public Policy (Elgar, Cheltenham).
30. Metcalfe, L. (1992), After 1992: Can the Commission manage Europe? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 51, 1, pp. 117-130.
31. Metcalfe, L. (1999), Reforming the Commission. EIPASCOPE, 3, pp. 3-9.
32. Middelhoek, A. et al. (1999), First Report on Allegations Regarding Fraud, Mismanagement and Nepotism in the European Commission (Committee of Independent Experts, Brussels).
33. Middelhoek, A. et al. (1999a), Second Report on Reform of the Commission Analysis of Current Practice and Proposals for Tackling Mismanagement, Irregularities and Fraud (Committee of Independent Experts, Brussels).
34. Middelhoek, A. et al. (1999b), Second Report on Reform of the Commission Analysis of Current Practice and Proposals for Tackling Mismanagement, Irregularities and Fraud. Vol. II (Committee of Independent Experts, Brussels).
35. Newman, J. (2001), Modernizing Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (Sage, London).
36. Pollitt, C. (1993), Managerialism and the Public Services (Blackwell, Oxford).
37. Pollitt, C., Birchall, J. and Putnam, K. (1998), Decentralizing Public Service Management (Macmillan, Basingstoke).
38. Pratley, A. (1999), Budgetary control in the European Union: Strengths and weaknesses. In Levy, R. (Ed), Managing, Monitoring and Evaluating the EU Budget: Internal and External Perspectives (EIPA, Maastricht), pp. 93-106.
39. Stevens, A. and Stevens, H. (1997), Le non- management del’ Europe. Politique et Management Public, 15, 1, pp. 33-52.
40. Stevens, A. and Stevens, H. (2001), Brussels Bureaucrats? The Administration of the European Union (Palgrave, Basingstoke).
41. Strasser, D. (1992), The Finances of Europe (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg).