Innovation and vertical integration in complementary markets

Journal of Economics and Management Strategy

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 387-417

  Heeb, Randal ^a  

^a INSEAD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041973784     PISSN: 10586407     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/105864003322309527     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Anderson, S., A. de Palma, and Y. Nesterov, 1995, "Oligopolistic Competition and the Optimal Provision of Products," Econometrics, 63 (6), 1281-1301.
2. Capita, A. and B. Nalebuff, 1991, "Aggregation and Imperfect Competition: On the Existence of Equilibrium," Econometrica, 59 (1), 25-59.
3. Carlton, D. and M. Waldman, 2002, "The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries," RAND Journal of Economics, 33 (2), 194-220.
4. Choi, J. P., 1999, "Tying and Innovation," Working Paper, Columbia University.
5. _ and C. Stefanadis, 2001, "Tying Investment and the Dynamic Leverage Theory," Rand Journal of Economics, 32 (1), 52-71.
6. de Palma, A., V. Ginsburgh, Y.Y. Papageorgiou, and Y. Thisse, 1985, "The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Holds under Sufficient Heterogeneity," Econometrica, 53 (4), 767-782.
7. Economides, N., 1999, "Quality Choice and Vertical Integration," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 903-914.
8. _ and S. Salop, 1992, "Competition and Integration among Complements, and Network Market Structure," Journal of Industrial Economics, 40 (1), 105-123.
9. Farrell, J. and M. Katz, 2000, "Innovation, Rent Extraction, and Integration in Systems Markets," Journal of Industrial Economics, 97 (4), 413-432.
10. Fudenberg, D. and J. Tirole, 1998, "Upgrades, Trade-ins and Buy-Backs," Rand Journal of Economics, 29, 235-258.
11. Ghemawat, P., 1991, "Market Incumbency and Technological Inertia," Marketing Science, 10 (2), 161-167.
12. Gilbert, R. and M. Katz, 2001, "An Economist's Guide to U.S. vs. Microsoft," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 25-44.
13. Greenstein, S. and G. Ramey, 1998, "Market Structure, Innovation and Vertical Product Differentiation," International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 285-311.
14. Heeb, R., 2001, "Catching up in Quality," Working Paper, INSEAD.
15. _, 2002, "The Problem with Market Coverage in a Spatial Model, " Working Paper, INSEAD.
16. Klein, B., 1998, "Microsoft's Use of Zero Price Bundling to Fight the Browser Wars," in Conference Proceedings, Competition, Convergence and the Microsoft Monopoly.
17. _, Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace: Proceedings of a conference held by the Progress and Freedom Foundation in Washington, DC, February 5, 1998, 1999, pp. 217-253, Boston: Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
18. _, 2001, "The Microsoft Case: What Can a Dominant Firm Do to Defend Its Market Position?" Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 45-62.
19. Matutes, C. and P. Regibeau, 1988, "Product Compatibility without Network Externalities," Rand Journal of Economics, 19 (2), 221-234.
20. Nalebuff, B., 1999, "Bundling," Working Paper, Yale University.
21. Ordover, J., A. Sykes, and R. Willig, 1985, "Nonprice Anticompetitive Behavior by Dominant Firms toward the Producers of Complementary Products," in F. Fisher, ed., Antitrust and Regulation Essays in Memory of John J. McGowan, MIT Press.
22. Riordan, M., 1998, "Anticompetitive Vertical Integration by a Dominant Firm," American Economic Review, 88 (5), 1232.
23. Shaked, A. and J. Sutton, 1982, "Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation," Review of Economic Studies, XLIX, 3-13.
24. Waldman, M., 1996, "Durable Goods Pricing when Quality Matters," Journal of Business, 69 (4), 489-509.
25. Whinston, M., 1990, "Tying, Foreclosure and Exclusion," American Economic Review (Sept.), 837-859.
26. _, 2001, "Exclusivity and Tying in U.S. vs. Microsoft: What We Know, and Don't Know," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (2), 63-80.