Epistemic divergence and the publicity of scientific methods

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 597-612

  Piccinini, Gualtiero ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistemic divergence; Intersubjective test; Method of possible cases; Public method; Reliabilism

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041927736     PISSN: 13698486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0039-3681(03)00049-9     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Dennett D. Consciousness explained 1991 Brown Boston
2. Feigl H. The scientific outlook: Naturalism and humanism In Feigl H. Brodbeck M. (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science 1953 8-18 Appleton-Century-Crofts New York
3. Goldman A.I. Epistemology and cognition 1986 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
4. Goldman A.I. Liaisons: Philosophy meets the cognitive and social sciences 1992 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
5. Goldman A.I. Science, publicity, and consciousness Philosophy of Science 64 1997 525-545
6. Hempel C. Fundamentals of concept formation in empirical sciences 1952 University of Chicago Press Chicago
7. Jackson F. From metaphysics to ethics: A defence of conceptual analysis 1998 Clarendon Press Oxford
8. Kant, I. (1965). Critique of pure reason (N. Kemp Smith, Trans.). New York: St. Martin. First published 1781.
9. Lyons W. The disappearance of introspection 1986 MIT Press Cambridge, MA
10. Piccinini, G. (forthcoming). Data from introspective reports: upgrading from commonsense to science. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
11. Popper K. The logic of scientific discovery 1959 Basic Books New York