Carbon exergy tax: A thermo-economic method to increase the efficient use of exergy resources

Energy Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 413-427

  Santarelli, Massimo Gian Luca ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Carbon exergy tax; CO2 emissions; Environomics

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ENERGY UTILIZATION; GAS TURBINE POWER PLANTS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELLS; TAXATION;

THERMO-ECONOMIC METHODS;

EXERGY;

CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC INSTRUMENT; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; POLLUTION TAX;

EID: 0041925046     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00310-5     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. x abatement. ASME Transactions Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbine and Power, 120, 557-569.
2. Arena, A.P., Borchiellini, R., Santarelli, M., 1997. Thermoeconomic Analysis of a combined power plant. Proceedings of the Sixth International Expert Meeting Power Engineering, Maribor.
3. Bejan A. Entropy Generation Minimization 1996 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
4. Bejan A. Tsatsaronis G. Moran M. Thermal Design and Optimization 1996 Wiley Interscience New York
5. Borchiellini R. Massardo A.F. Santarelli M. An analytical procedure for the carbon tax evaluation Energy Conversion and Management Journal 41 2000 1509-1531
6. Borchiellini R. Massardo A.F. Santarelli M. A carbon tax evaluation based on the efficient use of energy resources: a case study Journal of Applied Thermodynamics 3 3 2000 129-145
7. Boubel R.W. Fox D.L. Turner D.B. Stern A.C. Fundamentals of Air Pollution 1994 Academic Press Inc. New York
8. Cal̀, M., Massardo, A.F., Santarelli, M., 2000. Repowering proposal for an existing cogeneration plant including environmental cost internalization. ASME Paper 2000-GT-247, Munich.
9. Cohen H. Rogers G.F.C. Saravanamuttoo H.I.H. Gas Turbine Theory, 4th Edition 1996 Longman House New York
10. 2 with amines in a semiclosed GT cycle: plant performance and operating costs. ASME Paper 98-GT-450, Stockholm.
11. Dincer I. The role of exergy in energy policy making Energy Policy 30 2002 137-149
12. Exergia: Energy and Environmental Consultants, 1998. Cost-benefit analysis of energy technologies with internalization of environmental externalities. Thermie Programme Action, No. STR/261-95-HE, European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy (DG XVII).
13. Frangopoulos, C.A., 1983. Thermoeconomic functional analysis: a method for optimal design or improvement of complex thermal systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
14. Frangopoulos, C.A., 1991. Introduction to environomics. In: Moran, M. (Ed.). ASME-AES: Second Law Analysis, Industrial and Environmental Applications, Vol. 25, No. 49.
15. Frangopoulos, C.A., von Spakovsky, M.R., 1993. A global environomic approach for energy systems analysis and optimization (Part I and II). In: Szargut J. et al. (Eds.), ENSEC '93: Energy Systems and Ecology, Cracow, Poland.
16. Frangopoulos, C.A., Caralys, Y.C., 1997. A method for taking into account environmental impacts in the economic evaluation of energy systems. Energy Conversion and Management 38(15-17), 1751-1763.
17. Gaivao A. Jaumotte A.L. Evaluation economique de la pollution de l'environnement par une activité industrielle Application aux Centrales Electriques. Entropie 121 5 1985 5-11
18. Goodstein, E.S., 1999. Economics and the Environment. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
19. Kotas T.J. The Exergy Method of Thermal Plant Analysis 1985 Butterworths London
20. 2 recovery technology from combustion flue gas. JSME International Journal 41(4), 1007-1011.
21. Langeland K. Wilhelmsen K. A study of the costs and energy requirement for carbon dioxide disposal Energy Conversion and Management 34 9-11 1993 807-814
22. Legge Finanziaria Italia 1999. Ministero dell'Economia Italia, 1999. Gazzetta Ufficiale Repubblica Italiana Dicembre 1999.
23. Lozano M. Valero A. Theory of the exergetic cost Energy-The International Journal 18 939 1993 939-960
24. Massardo, A.F., Santarelli, M., Borchiellini, R., 2000. Carbon Exergy Tax (CET): Impact on Conventional Energy Systems Design and Its Contribution to Advanced Systems Utilisation. ASME: ECOS 2000, University of Twente, The Netherlands.
25. OECD, 1994. Managing the Environment: The Role of Economic Instruments. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
26. Ottinger, R., 1990. Environmental Externality Costs from Electric Utility Operations. New York State Energy Research and Development Agency, Albany, New York, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
27. Parkin M. Powell M. Matthews K. Economics 1997 Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
28. Richter, L.A., Volkov, E.P., Pokrovsky, V.N., 1984. In: Neporozhny P. (Eds), Thermal Power Plants and Environmental Control. Mir Publisher, Moskow.
29. x, CO and UHC Emissions. ASME Transactions Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 115.
30. Santarelli, M., 1998. Thermodynamic, economic and environmental considerations in the analysis and optimization of energy systems Ph.D. Thesis, Dipartimento di Energetica, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy (in Italian).
31. 2 influence. ASME Paper 99-GT-5, Indianapolis.
32. 2 sequestration effects on environomic analysis of existing power plants. ASME: ECOS '99, Tokyo, Japan.
33. Sciubba, E., 1999. In: Aceves, S.M., et al. (Eds.), Exergy as a Direct Measure of Environmental Impact, AES-Vol. 39, pp. 573-581.
34. 2 transportation system. Energy conversion and management 34(9-11), 1095-1103.
35. 2 disposal options. Energy Conversion and Management 34 (9-11), 1105-1112.