Midterm results after stentless mitral valve replacement

Circulation

Volumn 108, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2003, Pages

  Walther, Thomas ^a   Lehmann, Sven ^a   Falk, Volkmar ^a   Walther, Claudia ^a   Doll, Nico ^a   Rastan, Ardawan ^a   Metz, Sebastian ^a   Schneider, Johannes ^a   Gummert, Jan ^a   Mohr, Friedrich W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Mitral valve replacement; Stentless bioprostheses; Stentless mitral valve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETER ABLATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INDEX; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HUMAN; MALE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MITRAL VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; MITRAL VALVE STENOSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STENT; SURGICAL APPROACH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MITRAL VALVE; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0041916072     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Davis EA, Greene PS, Cameron DE, et al. Bioprosthetic versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement in the elderly. Circulation. 1996;94(suppl2):S121-125.
2. Jones EL, Weintraub WS, Craver JM, et al. Interaction of age and coronary disease after valve replacement: implications for valve selection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;58:378-384.
3. Burr LH, Jamieson WR, Munro AI, et al. Porcine bioprostheses in the elderly: clinical performance by age groups and valve positions. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:S264-269.
4. Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, et al. Twenty year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1301-1311.
5. Jamieson WR, Burr LH, Munro AI, et al. Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis: a 21-year experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66: S40-43.
6. Jamieson WR. Modern cardiac valve devices-bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses: state of the art. J Card Surg 1993;8:89-98.
7. Walther T, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al. Effectiveness of different anticalcification treatments for stentless aortic bioprostheses. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;47:23-25.
8. Fann JI, Burdon TA. Are the indications for tissue valves different in 2001 and how do we communicate these changes to our cardiology colleagues? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:126-135.
9. Hetzer R, Bougioukas G, Franz M, et al. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of papillary muscles and chordae tendineae - revival of seemingly forgotten concept. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;31:291-296.
10. David TE, Uden DE, Strauss HD. The importance of the mitral apparatus in left ventricular function after correction of mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1986;74:116-120.
11. Reardon MJ, David TE. Mitral valve replacement with preservation of the subvalvular apparatus. Curr Opin Cardiol. 1999;14:104-110.
12. Middlemost SJ, Sussman M, Patel A, et al. The stentless quadrileaflet bovine pericardial mitral valve: early clinical results. J Heart Valve Dis. 1999;8:174-179.
13. Walther T, Walther C, Falk V, et al.: Early clinical results after stentless mitral valve implantation and comparison with conventional valve repair or replacement. Circulation. 1999;100(19 Suppl):II78-83.
14. Liao K, Wu JJ, Frater RW: Intraoperative epicardial echo/Doppler evaluation of a stentless, chordally supported quadricusp mitral bioprostheses. ASAIO J. 1993;39:pM634-638.
15. Frater RWM, Liao K, Seifter E. Stentless chordally supported mitral bioprosthetic valve. New horizons and the future of heart valve bioprostheses, led, 1994:103-119.
16. Walther T, Falk V, Walther C, et al. Combined stentless mitral valve implantation and radiofrequency ablation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1080-1082.
17. Edmunds LH, Clark RE, Cohn LH, et al. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:932-935.
18. Acar C, Tolan M, Berrebi A, et al. Homograft replacement of the mitral valve: graft selection, technique of implantation, and results in fourty three patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1996;111:367-380.
19. Acar C. Editorial: the mitral homograft - is it worthwhile? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:448-449.
20. Kumar AS, Choudhary SK, Mathur A, et al. Homograft mitral valve replacement: five years' results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:450-458.
21. Kalmar P, Irrgang E: Cardiac surgery in Germany during 2000. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;49:XXXIII-XXXVIII.