Control charts for monitoring fault signatures: Cuscore versus GLR

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 387-396

  Runger, George C ^a   Testik, Murat C ^a  

^a Arizona State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cumulative score; CUSUM; Generalized likelihood ratio; Signal detection; Statistical process control

Indexed keywords

CLOSED LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; SIGNAL DETECTION; SYNCHRONIZATION;

GENERALIZED LIKELIHOOD RATIO (GLR);

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 0041878552     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.591     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Box GEP, Ramirez J. Cumulative score charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1992; 8:17-27.
2. Box GEP, Luceno A. Statistical Control by Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment. Wiley: New York, 1997.
3. Fisher RA. Theory of statistical estimation. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 1925; 22:700-725.
4. Luceño A. Average run lengths and run length probability distributions for Cuscore charts to control normal mean. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1999; 32:177-195.
5. Lorden G. Procedures for reacting to a change in distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1971; 42: 1897-1908.
6. Lai TL. Sequential change point detection in quality control and dynamical systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1995; 57:613-658.
7. Basseville M. Detecting changes in signals and systems - a survey. Automatica 1988; 24:309-326.
8. Ramirez JG. Monitoring clean room air using Cuscore charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 1998; 14:281-289.
9. Shao YE. Integrated application of the cumulative score control chart and engineering process control. Statistica Sinica 1998; 8:239-252.
10. Page ES. Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika 1954; 41:100-115.
11. Runger GC, Testik MC. Specific signal detection charts using generalized likelihood ratios. 2002 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Quality and Productivity Section [CD-ROM]. American Statistical Association: Alexandria, VA, 2002.
12. Bordignon S, Scagliarini M. Monitoring algorithms for detecting changes in the ozone concentrations. Environmetrics 2000; 11:125-137.
13. Vega P, Fuente MJ, Dominguez CM. Two algorithms for robust fault detection and diagnosis of an industrial plant. Control and Computers 1996; 24:93-101.
14. Apley DW, Shi J. The GLRT for statistical process control of autocorrelated processes. IIE Transactions 1999; 31:1123-1134.
15. Capizzi G. Design of change detection algorithms based on the generalized likelihood ratio test. Environmetrics 2001; 12:749-756.
16. Willsky AS, Jones HL. A generalized likelihood ratio approach to the detection and estimation of jumps in linear systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1976; AC21:108-112.
17. Lai TL, Shan JZ. Efficient recursive algorithms for detection of abrupt changes in signals and control systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1999; 44:952-966.
18. Bissell AF. The performance of control charts and cusums under linear trend. Applied Statistics 1984; 33:145-151.
19. Gan FF. Average run lengths for cumulative sum control charts under linear trend. Applied Statistics 1996; 45:505-526.
20. Aerne LA, Champ CW, Rigdon SE. Evaluation of control charts under linear trend. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods 1991; 20:3341-3349.
21. Reynolds MR, Stoumbos ZG, Individuals control schemes for monitoring the mean and variance of processes subject to drifts. Stochastic Analysis and Applications 2001; 19:863-892.