Examining contrast effects in performance appraisals: Using appropriate controls and assessing accuracy

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 136, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 667-683

  Becker, Geraldine A ^a   Miller, Charles E ^b  

^a NATIONAL LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Assimilation; Contrast effects; Performance appraisals

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TIME; VIDEORECORDING;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; EFFECT MODIFIERS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; TIME FACTORS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 0041869224     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223980209604827     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Antonioni, D. (1996, April). Panel discussion: 360-degree feedback gone amok: Where are the data? Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
2. Atwater, L. E. (1998). The advantages and pitfalls of self-assessment in organizations. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 331-369). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Balzer, W. K. (1986). Biases in the recording of performance-related information: The effects of initial impression and centrality of the appraisal task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 329-347.
4. Becker, G., & Villanova, P. (1995). Effects of rating procedure and temporal delay on the magnitude of contrast effects in performance ratings. The Journal of Psychology, 129, 37-43.
5. Bernardin, H. J., & Beatty, R. W. (1984). Performance appraisal: Assessing human behavior at work. Boston: Kent.
6. Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (1986). Performance appraisal. In E. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 43-62). Boston: Heath/Lexington.
7. Borman, W. C. (1977). Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 238-252.
8. Buckley, M. R., Villanova, P., & Benson, P. G. (1989). Contrast effects in performance ratings: Another look across time. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 38, 131-143.
9. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. In Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, Series No. 07-017. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.
10. Cleveland, J. N., Murphy, K. R., & Williams, R. E. (1989). Multiple uses of performance appraisal: Prevalence and correlates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 130-135.
11. Cooper, W. H. (1981). Ubiquitous halo. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 218-244.
12. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on "understanding of others" and "assumed similarity." Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
13. Hakel, M. D., Ohnesorge, J. P., & Dunnette, M. D. (1970). Inter-viewer evaluations of job applicants' resumes as a function of the qualifications of the immediately preceding applicants: An examination of contrast effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 27-30.
14. Herr, P. M., Sherman, S. J., & Fazio, R. H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.
15. Keppel, G. (1982). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Kingstrom, P. O., & Bass, A. R. (1981). A critical analysis of studies comparing behaviorally anchored rating scales (BARS) and other rating formats. Personnel Psychology, 34, 263-289.
17. Kravitz, D. A., & Balzer, W. K. (1992). Context effects in performance appraisal: A methodological critique and empirical study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 24-31
18. Landy, F. J., & Farr, J. L. (1980). Performance rating. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 72-107.
19. Latham, G. P., Wexley, K. N., & Pursell, E. D. (1975). Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 550-555.
20. Martin, L. L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
21. Martin, L. L., & Seta, J. J. (1983). Perceptions of unity and distinctiveness as determinants of attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 755-764.
22. Maurer, T. J., & Alexander, R. A. (1991). Contrast effects in behavioral measurement: An investigation of alternative process explanations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 3-10.
23. Murphy, K. R., & Balzer, W. K. (1986). Systematic distortions in memory-based behavior ratings and performance evaluations: Consequences for rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 39-44.
24. Murphy, K. R., & Balzer, W. K. (1989). Rater errors and rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 619-624.
25. Murphy, K. R., Balzer, W. K., Lockhart, M. C., & Eisenman, E. J. (1985). Effects of previous performance on evaluations of present performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 72-84.
26. Murphy, K. R., Gannett, B. A., Herr, B. M., & Chen, J. A. (1986). Effects of subsequent performance on evaluations of previous performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 427-431.
27. Roach, D. W., & Gupta, N. (1992). A realistic simulation for assessing the relationships among components of rating accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 196-200.
28. Rowe, P. M. (1967). Order effects in assessment decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 170-173.
29. Schuh, A. J. (1978). Contrast effect in the interview. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 11, 195-196.
30. Smither, J. W. (1998). Lessons learned: Research implications for performance appraisal and management practice. In J. W. Smither (Ed.), Performance appraisal: State of the art in practice (pp. 537-547). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Smither, J. W., Reilly, R. R., & Buda, R. (1988). Effect of prior performance information on ratings of present performance: Contrast versus assimilation revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 487-496.
32. Steiner, D. D., & Rain, J. S. (1989). Immediate and delayed primacy and recency effects in performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 136-142.
33. Van de Ven, A. H., Delbecq, A. L., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations. American Sociological Review, 41, 322-338.
34. Waldman, D. A. (1997). Predictors of employee preferences for multi-rater and group-based performance appraisal. Group and Organization Management, 22, 264-287.
35. Wexley, K. N., Yukl, G. A., Kovacs, S. Z., & Sanders, R. E. (1972). Importance of contrast effects in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 5-48.
36. Wyer, R. S. (1974). Changes in meaning and halo effects in personality impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 829-835.