Secondary structural preferences of 2,2-disubstituted pyrrolidine-4-carboxylic acid oligomers: β-peptide foldamers that cannot form internal hydrogen bonds

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 125, Issue 30, 2003, Pages 9035-9037

  Huck, Bayard R ^a   Fisk, John D ^a   Guzei, Ilia A ^a   Carlson, Heather A ^b   Gellman, Samuel H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID; CARBOXYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; OLIGOMER; PEPTIDE; PYRROLIDINE 4 CARBOXYLIC ACID; PYRROLIDINE DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CARBON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; HYDROGEN BOND; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; QUANTUM MECHANICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; DIMERIZATION; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, BIOMOLECULAR; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PYRROLIDINES;

EID: 0041866613     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja034561c     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Gellman, S. H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 173.
2. Hill, D. J.; Mio, M. J.; Prince, R. B.; Hughes, T. S.; Moore, J. S. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3893.
3. (a) Werder, M.; Hauser, H.; Abele, S.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1774.
4. (b) Hamuro, Y.; Schneider, J. P.; DeGrado, W. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 12200.
5. (c) Porter, E. A.; Wang, X.; Lee, H.-S.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. Nature 2000, 404, 565.
6. (d) Gademan, K.; Kimmerlin, T.; Hoyer, D.; Seebach, D. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 2460.
7. (e) Raguse, T. L.; Porter, E. A.; Weisblum, B.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12774 and references therein.
8. Cheng, R. P.; Gellman, S. H.; DeGrado, W. F. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3219.
9. (a) Rabanal, R.; Ludevid, M. D.; Pons, M.; Giralt, E. Biopolymers 1993, 33, 1019.
10. (b) Kay, B. K.; Williamson, M. P., Sudol, M. FASEB J. 2000, 14, 231.
11. (c) DeRider, M. L.; Wilkens, S. J.; Waddell, M. J.; Bretscher, L. E.; Weinhold, F.; Raines, R. T.; Markley, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2497.
12. (d) Kwak, J.; Capua, A. D.; Locardi, E.; Goodman, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14085.
13. (a) Armand, P.; Kirshenbaum, K.; Goldsmith, R. A.; Farr-Jones, S.; Barron, A. E.; Truong, K. T.; Dill, K. A.; Mierke, D. F.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Bradley, E. K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 4309.
14. (b) Kirshenbaum, K.; Barron, A. E.; Goldsmith, R. A.; Armand, P.; Bradley, E. K.; Truong, K. T.; Dill, K. A.; Cohen, F. E.; Zuckermann, R. N. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 4303.
15. (c) Wu, C. W.; Sanborn, T. J.; Huang, K.; Zuckermann, R. N.; Barron, A. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6778.
16. See, for example: (a) Lokey, R. S.; Iverson, B. L. Nature 1995, 375, 303.
17. (b) Nelson, J. C.; Saven, J. G.; Moore, J. S.; Wolynes, P. G. Science 1997, 277, 1793.
18. Huck, B. R.; Langenhan, J. M.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1717. Computational analysis of these systems: Chandrasekhar, J.; Saunders, M.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1646.
19. Huck, B. R.; Langenhan, J. M.; Gellman, S. H. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 1717. Computational analysis of these systems: Chandrasekhar, J.; Saunders, M.; Jorgensen, W. L. J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 1646.
20. Abele, S.; Vogtli, K.; Seebach, D. Helv. Chim. Acta 1999, 82, 1539.
21. For related work on PCA oligomers, see: Kim, Y. J.; Kaiser, D. A.; Pollard, T. D.; Ichikawa, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 2417.
22. (a) Okabayashi, H.; Isemura, T.; Sakakibara, S. Biopolymers 1968, 6, 323.
23. (b) Rothe, M.; Rott, H.; Mazanek, J. Peptides; Loffet, A., Ed.; Editions de l'Universite de Bruxelles: Brussels, 1976; p 309.
24. (c) Helbecque, H.; Loucheux-Lefebvre, M. H. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1982, 19, 94.
25. (d) Dukor, R. M.; Keiderling, T. A. Biopolymers 1991, 31, 1747.
26. Huck, B. R. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2002.
27. For related efforts to bias rotamer preferences in Xaa-Pro linkages, see: Halab, L.; Lubell, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2474 and references therein.
28. Sato, T.; Kugo, Y.; Nakaumi, E.; Ishibashi, H.; Ikeda, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1995, 1801. Nagumo, S.; Mizukami, M.; Akutsu, N.; Nishida, A.; Kawahara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3209.
29. Sato, T.; Kugo, Y.; Nakaumi, E.; Ishibashi, H.; Ikeda, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1995, 1801. Nagumo, S.; Mizukami, M.; Akutsu, N.; Nishida, A.; Kawahara, N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 3209.
30. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A. D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi, M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli, C.; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.; Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Ortiz, J. V.; Baboul, A. G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.; Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, revision A.9; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
31. Guntert, P.; Mumenthaler, C.; Wüthrich, K. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 273, 283.
32. Sybyl version 6.8, c.o. http://www.tripos.com.
33. Restrained simulated annealing was performed using the Merck molecular force field as implemented in Sybyl. Initial structures were taken from DYANA simulations. NOE derived restraints were included using a flat well potential (range constraints in Sybyl). Constraints of 0-3, 0-4, 0-5 Å plus corrections for pseudo atoms were employed for strong, medium, and weak NOEs, respectively. The molecules were equilibrated for 2 ps at 1000 K and cooled linearly to 200 K over 10 ps with 0.5 fs time steps. The resulting structure was used as the input for the following annealing cycle. Typically, 10-20 cycles were run. A constant dielectric of 9.0 was employed to simulate dichloromethane. Final structures were minimized without constraints and represented local minima.
34. Wiegand, H.; Bernard, B.; Schweitzer, A.; Camenisch, G. P.; Rodriguez Perez, M. I.; Gross, G.; Woessner, R.; Voges, R.; Arvidsson, P. I.; Frackenpohl, J.; Seebach, D. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2002, 23, 251-262.