Plan Puebla-Panama: Toward FTAA or regionalism?

Business Horizons

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 33-40

  Pisani, Michael J ^a   Wayne, A Label ^b  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUADALAJARA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041864176     PISSN: 00076813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0007-6813(03)00069-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bulmer-Thomas, Victor (ed.). 2001. Introduction to Regional integration in Latin America and the Caribbean: The political economy of open regionalism, 1-13. London: University of London, Institute of Latin American Studies.
2. Call, Wendy. 2002a. Plan Puebla-Panama: Done deal or emerging flashpoint? Americas Program Investigative Article. www. americaspolicy.org/articles/2002/0204puebla.html (9 April).
3. Call, Wendy. 2002b. Resisting the Plan Puebla-Panama. Citizen Action in the Americas www.americaspolicy.org/citizen-action/series/02-ppp.html (No. 2, September.)
4. Carl, Traci. 2002. Mexican maquiladoras still struggle despite recovery. Associated Press State & Local Wire (22 April).
5. CEPAL. 2001. Plan Puebla-Panamá: Iniciativas Mesoamericanas y proyectos. www.cepal.org.mx (8 August).
6. Flynn, Matthew. 2001. Fox strives to spread maquiladoras south. Borderlines Updater (7 August).
7. Hurrell, Andrew. 2001. The politics of regional integration in MERCOSUR. In Bulmer-Thomas, op. cit., 194-211.
8. IADB (Inter-American Development Bank). 2002. Informe de la comisión de financiamiento del Plan Puebla-Panamá. www.iadb.org/ppp/ (Washington, 15 June).
9. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica de Mexico). 2001. Compendio de Informacion de la region Puebla-Panama. www.inegi.gob.mx/
10. Jordan, Gionela. 2002. Panama: Central American vice-presidents pledge to promote Puebla-Panama Plan. www.laprensa. com.ni (19 August).
11. Krueger, Anne O. 2000. NAFTA's effects: A preliminary assessment. The World Economy 23/6: 761-775.
12. LaFeber, Walter. 1993. Inevitable revolutions: The United States in Central America, 2nd ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
13. Linquist, Diane. 2002. Free fall: US downturn, strong peso bring worst year ever to plants in Baja. San Diego Union-Tribune (27 March): A-1.
14. Medina, Fausto, and Marcelo Antinori. 2001. Plan Puebla-Panama. Unpublished IADB presentation (June).
15. Nicholls, Shelton M.A. 1998. Measuring trade creation and trade diversion in the Central American Common Market: A Hicksian alternative. World Development 26/2: 323-335.
16. Nicholls, Shelton M.A., Garnett Samuel, Philip Colthrust, and Earl Boodoo. 2001. Open regionalism and institutional developments among the smaller integration schemes of CARICOM, the Andean Community, and the Central American Common Market. In Bulmer Thomas, op. cit., 141-164.
17. Pisani, Michael J. 2001. Mexico: The colossus of the north. Western Hemispheric Digest 1/5: 4-5.
18. Rodas-Martini, Pablo. 2001. Central America: Towards open regionalism or towards an opening without regionalism. In Bulmer-Thomas, op. cit., 260-274.
19. Rodas-Martini, Pablo. 1998. Intra-industry trade and revealed comparative advantage in the Central American Common Market. World Development 26/2: 337-344.
20. Ross, John. 2001. PPP plays into Washington's hand for Latin America. Borderlines Updater (7 August).
21. Rueda-Junquera, Fernando. 1998. Regional integration and agricultural trade in Central America. World Development 26/2: 345-362.
22. Schott, Jeffery J. 2001. Prospects for free trade in the Americas. Washington: Institute for International Economics.
23. Smith, Geri. 2002. The decline of the maquiladora. Business Week (29 April): 59.
24. United Nations Development Programme. 2001. Human development report, 2001. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Woodward, Ralph L., Jr. 1999. Central America: A nation divided, 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.