Effects of cone adaptation on variability in S-cone increment thresholds

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 4140-4146

  Felius, Joost ^a,b   Swanson, William H ^a,c  

^a RETINA FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTHWEST   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACHROMATIC PERIMETRY; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LUMINANCE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERIMETRY; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RETINA CONE; SHORT WAVELENGTH AUTOMATED PERIMETRY; SHORT WAVELENGTH SENSITIVE CONE; VISION; VISUAL ADAPTATION;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; ADULT; AGED; CONES (RETINA); HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0041860929     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-1067     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Heron G, Adams AJ, Husted R. Central visual-fields for short-wavelength sensitive pathways in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988;29:64-72.
2. de Jong LAMS, Snepvangers CEJ, van den Berg TJTP, Langerhorst CT. Blue-on-yellow perimetry in the detection of early glaucomatous damage. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990;75:303-314.
3. Sample PA, Taylor JDN, Martinez GA, Lusky M, Weinreb RN. Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;115:225-233.
4. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Blue-on-yellow perimetry can predict the development of glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:645-650.
5. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Casson EJ, Brandt JD. Progression of early glaucomatous visual field loss as detected by blue-on-yellow and standard white-on-white automated perimetry. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:651-656.
6. Soliman MA, de Jong LAMS, Ismaeil AA, van den Berg TJTP, de Smet MD. Standard achromatic perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry, and frequency doubling technology for detection of glaucoma damage. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:444-454.
7. Keltner JL, Johnson CA. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in neuro-ophthalmologic disorders. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:475-481.
8. Lobefalo L, Verrotti A, Mastropasqua L, Della Loggia G, et al. Blue-on-yellow and achromatic perimetry in diabetic children without retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:2003-2006.
9. Remky A, Arend O, Hendricks S. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and capillary density in early diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:274-281.
10. Remky A, Lichtenberg K, Elsner AE, Arend O. Short-wavelength automated perimetry in age-related maculopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85:1432-1436.
11. Kwon YH, Park HJ, Jap A, Ugurlu S, Caprioli J. Test-retest variability of blue-on-yellow perimetry is greater than white-on-white perimetry in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:29-36.
12. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lee AC, Kono Y, Weinreb RN. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:309-313.
13. Hutchings N, Hosking SL, Wild JM, Flanagan JG. Long-term fluctuation in short-wavelength automated perimetry in glaucoma suspects and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2332-2337.
14. Wild JM, Moss ID, Whitaker D, O'Neill EC. Statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1398-1410.
15. Wild JM, Cubbidge RP, Pacey IE, Robinson R. Statistical aspects of the normal visual field in short-wavelength automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:54-63.
16. Felius J, de Jong LAMS, van den Berg TJTP, Greve EL. Functional characteristics of blue-on-yellow perimetric thresholds in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1665-1674.
17. Greenstein VC, Halevy D, Zaidi Q, Koenig KL, Ritch RH. Chromatic and luminance system deficits in glaucoma. Vision Res. 1996;36:621-629.
18. Watanabe A, Smith VC, Pokorny J. Psychometric functions for chromatic discrimination. In: Cavonius CR, ed. Colour Vision Deficiencies XIII. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1997:369-376.
19. Pearson P, Swanson WH, Fellman RL. Chromatic and achromatic defects in patients with progressing glaucoma. Vision Res. 2001;41:1215-1227.
20. Sample PA, Haegerstrom-Portnoy G, Adams AJ. Optimum parameters for short-wavelength automated perimetry. J Glaucoma. 1996;5:375-383.
21. 3 color mechanisms of Stiles. Vision Res. 1979;19:293-312.
22. Mollon JD, Polden PG. Post-receptoral adaptation. Vision Res. 1979;19:435-440.
23. Krauskopf J, Reeves A. Measurement of the effect of photon noise on detection. Vision Res. 1980;20:193-196.
24. Yeh T, Pokorny J, Smith VC. Chromatic discrimination variation in chromaticity and luminance: data and theory. Vision Res. 1993;33:1835-1845.
25. Nygaard RW, Frumkes TE. Calibration of the retinal illuminance provided by Maxwellian views. Vision Res. 1982;22:433-434.
26. Boynton RM, Kambe N. Chromatic difference steps of moderate size measured along theoretically critical axes. Color Res Appl. 1980;5:13-23.
27. Miyahara E, Smith VC, Pokorny J. How surrounds affect chromaticity discrimination. J Opt Soc Am A. 1993;10:545-553.
28. Swanson WH, Birch EE. Extracting thresholds from noisy psychophysical data. Percep Psychophys. 1992;51:409-422.
29. Smith VC, Pokorny J. Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Res. 1975;15:161-171.
30. Wyszecki G, Stiles WS. In: Color Science: Concepts and Methods, Quantitative Data and Formulae. New York: John Wiley & Sons: 1982
31. Pokomy J, Smith VC, Lutze M. Aging of the human lens. Appl Optics. 1987;26:1437-1440.
32. Delori FC, Goger DG, Hammond BR, Snodderly DM, Bums SA. Macular pigment density measured by autofluorescence spectrometry: comparison with reflectometry and heterochromatic flicker photometry. J Opt Soc Am A. 2001;18:1212-1230.
33. Pearson PM, Swanson WH. Chromatic contrast sensitivity: the role of absolute threshold and gain constant in differences between the fovea and the periphery. J Opt Soc Am A. 2000;17:232-243.
34. Eisner A, Samples JR, Campbell HM, Cioffi GA. Foveal adaptation abnormalities in early glaucoma. J Opt Soc Am A. 1995;12:2318-2328.
35. Eisner A, Fleming SA, Klein ML, Mauldin WM. Sensitivities in older eyes with good acuity: cross-sectional norms. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:1824-1831.
36. Johnson CA, Adams AJ, Lewis RA. Evidence for a neural basis of age-related visual field loss in normal observers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:2056-2064.
37. Remky A, Elsner AE, Morandi AJ, Beausencourt E, Trempe CL. Blue-on-yellow perimetry with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope: small alterations in the central macula with aging. J Opt Soc Am A. 2001;18:1425-1436.
38. Wall M, Kutzko KE, Chauhan BC. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:426-435.
39. Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:130-135.
40. Piltz JR, Starita RJ. Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields (letter). Am J Ophthalmol. 1990;109:109-110.
41. Strasburger H. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Percep Psychophys. 2001;63:1348-1355.
42. Jacobson SG, Voigt WJ, Parel JM, et al. Automated light- and darkadapted perimetry for evaluating retinitis pigmentosa. Ophthalmology. 1986;93:1604-1611.
43. Felius J, de Jong LAMS, van den Berg TJTP, Greve EL. Automated scotopic perimetry in glaucoma. In: Mills RP, ed. Perimetry Update 1992/93. Amsterdam/ New York: Kugler; 1993:339-343.
44. Judd DB. Basic correlates of the visual stimulus. In: Stevens SS, ed. Handbook of Experimental Psychology. New York: Wiley; 1951.
45. Wisowaty JJ, Boynton RM. Temporal modulation sensitivity of the blue mechanism: measurements made without chromatic adaptation. Vision Res. 1980;20:895-909.