Defining monetary values for quality of life improvements: An exploratory study

PharmacoEconomics

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 865-874

  Lachaine, Jean ^a   Laurier, Claudine ^a   Contandriopoulos, André Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINGENT VALUATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST UTILITY ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH STATUS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SAMPLING;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANADA; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FINANCING, PERSONAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0041854244     PISSN: 11707690     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200321120-00003     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mitchell RC, Carson RT. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington: Resources for the Future, 1989
2. Johannesson M, Johansson PO, Jonsson B. Economic evaluation of drug therapy: a review of contingent valuation method. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 1 (5): 325-37
3. Gafni A. Willingness to pay: what's in a name. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 14 (5): 465-70
4. Johannesson M, Jonsson B. Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost benefit analysis. Health Policy 1991; 17: 1-23
5. Diener A, O'Brien B, Gafni A. Health care contingent valuation studies: a review and classification of the literature. Health Econ 1998; 7: 313-26
6. Gold M, Siegel J, Russell L, et al. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996
7. Drummond MF, O'Brien B, Stoddart G, et al. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997
8. Appel LJ, Steinberg EP, Powe NR, et al. Risk Reduction from low osmolality contrast media. Med Care 1990; 28: 324-37
9. Berwick D, Weinstein MC. What do patients value?: willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy. Med Care 1985; 7: 881-93
10. Chestnut LG, Keller LR, Lambert WE, et al. Measuring heart patients' willingness to pay for changes in angina symptoms. Med Decis Making 1996; 16: 65-77
11. Johannesson M, Johansson PO, Kristrom B, et al. Willingness to pay for lipid lowering: a health production function approach. Appl Econ 1993; 25: 1023-31
12. Kartman B, Stalhammar NO, Johannesson M. Valuation of health changes with the contingent valuation method: a test of scope and question order effects. Health Econ 1996; 5: 531-41
13. Neumann PJ, Johannesson M. The willingness to pay for in vitro fertilization: a pilot study using contingent valuation. Med Care 1994; 32: 686-99
14. Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Med Care 1995; 33: 392-406
15. Ryan M. Using willingness to pay to assess the benefits of assisted reproductive techniques. Health Econ 1996; 5: 543-58
16. Thompson M, Read J, Liang M. Feasibility of willingness to pay measurement in chronic arthritis. Med Decis Making 1984; 4: 195-215