The SIP68: An abbreviated sickness impact profile for disability outcomes research

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 12, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 583-595

  Nanda, Upasana ^a   McLendon, Patricia M ^a   Andresen, Elena M ^a   Armbrecht, Eric ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Disabled persons; Health status indicators; Quality of life; Questionnaires; SIP; SIP68

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMETRICS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE;

EID: 0041854238     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025036325886     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, Gilson BS. The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care 1981; 19: 787-805.
2. Bendtsen P, Hornquist JO. Severity of rheumatoid arthritis, function and quality of life: Sub-group comparisons. Clin Exp Rheum 1993; 11(5): 495-502.
3. Deyo RA, Inui TS, Leininger J, Overman S. Physical and psychosocial function in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical use of a self-administered health status instrument. Arch Intern Med 1982; 142(5): 879-882.
4. Deyo RA, Inui TS, Leininger JD, Overman SS. Measuring functional outcomes in chronic disease: A comparison of traditional scales and a self-administered health status questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Med Care 1983; 21(2): 180-192.
5. Katz JN, Larson MG, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Comparative measurement sensitivity of short and longer health status instruments. Med Care 1992; 30(10): 917-925.
6. Sullivan M, Ahlmen M, Archenholtz B, Svensson G. Measuring health in rheumatic disorders by means of a Swedish version of the Sickness Impact Profile. Results from a population study. Scand J Rheum 1986; 15(2): 193-200.
7. Weinberger M, Samsa GP, Tierney WM, Belyea MJ, Hiner SL. Generic versus disease specific health status measures: Comparing the Sickness Impact Profile and the Arthritis Impact Measurement scales. J Rheum 1992; 19(4): 543-546.
8. De Haan R, Horn J, Limburg M, Van Der Meulen J, Bossuyt P. A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke 1993; 24(8): 1178-1181.
9. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Functional assessment scales: A study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74(2): 133-138.
10. Nydevik I, Hulter Asberg K. Subjective dysfunction after stroke. A study with the Sickness Impact Profile. Scand J Prim Health Care 1991; 9(4): 271-275.
11. Nydevik I, Hulter-Asberg K. Sickness impact after stroke. A 3-year follow-up. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10(4): 284-289.
12. Schuling J, Greidanus J, Meyboom-de Jong B. Measuring functional status of stroke patients with the Sickness Impact Profile. Disabil Rehabil 1993; 15(1): 19-23.
13. Butcher JL, MacKenzie EJ, Cushing B, et al. Long-term outcomes after lower extremity trauma. J Trauma 1996; 41(1): 4-9.
14. Greive AC, Lankhorst GJ. Functional outcome of lower-limb amputees: A prospective descriptive study in a general hospital. Prosthet Orthot Int 1996; 20(2): 79-87.
15. Lundqvist C, Siosteen A, Sullivan L, Blomstrand C, Lind B, Sullivan M. Spinal cord injuries: A shortened measure of function and mood. Spinal Cord 1997; 35(1): 17-21.
16. Munster AM, Fauerbach JA, Lawrence J. Development and utilization of a psychometric instrument for measuring quality of life in burn patients, 1976 to 1996. Acta Chir Plast 1996; 38(4): 128-131.
17. Schanke AK. Psychological distress, social support and coping behaviour among polio survivors: A 5-year perspective on 63 polio patients. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19(3): 108-116.
18. van Balen HG, Mulder T, Keyser A. Towards a disability-oriented epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 1996; 18(4): 181-190.
19. Elliott TR, Herrick SM, Witty TE, et al. Social relationships and psychosocial impairment of persons with spinal cord injury. Psychol Health 1992a; 7(1): 55-67.
20. Elliott TR, Herrick SM, Witty TE, Godshall F, Spruell M. Social support and depression following spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol 1992b; 37(1): 37-48.
21. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JPM, de Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Philipsen H. The development of a short generic version of the Sickness Impact Profile. J Clin Epidemiol 1994a; 47: 407-418.
22. de Bruin AF, Buys M, de Witte LP, Diederiks JPM. The Sickness Impact Profile: SIP68, a short generic version, first evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility. J Clin Epidemiol 1994b; 47: 863-871.
23. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JPM, de Witte LP, Stevens FCJ, Philipsen H. Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: The Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68. J Clin Epidemiol 1997; 50: 529-549.
24. Post MWM, de Bruin A, de Witte L, Schrijvers A. The SIP68: A measure of health-related functional status in rehabilitation medicine. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 440-445.
25. Post MWM, van Asbeck FWA, van Dijk AJ, Schrijvers AJP. Services for spinal cord injured: Availability and satisfaction. Spinal Cord 1997; 35: 109-115.
26. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2): S15-S20.
27. Andresen EM, Vahle VJ, Lollar D. Proxy reliability: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability. Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 609-619.
28. Nelson LM, Longstreth WTJ, Koepsell TD, et al. Proxy respondents in epidmiologic research. Epidemiol Rev 1990; 12: 71-86.
29. Rothman ML, Hedrick SC, Bulcroft KA, et al. The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care 1991; 29(2): 115-124.
30. Magaziner J, Simonsick EM, Kashner TM, et al. Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41(11): 1065-1074.
31. Epstein AM, Hall JA, Tognetti J, et al. Using proxies to evaluate quality of life. Can they provide valid information about patients' health status and satisficaion with medical care? Med Care 1989; 27(Suppl 3): S91-S98.
32. Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, Sprangers MA, et al. Comparison of patient and proxy EORTC QLQ-C30 ratings in assessing the quality of life of cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(7): 617-631.
33. Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, Sprangers MA, et al. Value of caregiver ratings in evaluating the quality of life of patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15(3): 1206-1217.
34. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Osoba D, et al. The use of significant others as proxy raters of the quality of life of patients with brain cancer. Med Care 1997; 35(5): 490-506.
35. Spangers MA, Aaronson NK. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45(7): 743-760.
36. Rothman ML, Hedrick SC, Bulcroft KA, et al. The validity of proxy-generated scores as measures of patient health status. Med Care 1991; 29(2): 115-124.
37. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969; 9: 179-185.
38. Lawton MP. Scales to measure competence in everyday activities. Psychopharmacol Bull 1988; 24: 609-614.
39. Lawton MP, Moss M, Fulcomer M, Kleban MH. A research and service-oriented multilevel assessment instrument. J Gerontol 1982; 37: 91-99.
40. Katz S. Assessing the self-maintenance: Activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc 1983; 31: 721-727.
41. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
42. Andresen EM, Fouts BS, Romeis JC, Brownson CA. Performance of health-related quality-of-life instruments in a spinal cord injured population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 877-884.
43. Nanda U, Andresen EM. Performance of measures of health-related quality of life and function among disabled adults (abstract). Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 644.
44. Prysak GM, Andresen EM, Meyers AM. Prevalence of secondary conditions in veterans with spinal cord injury and their interference with life activities. Topics Spinal Cord Injury 2000; 6(1): 34-42.
45. Meyers AR, Bisbee A, Winter M. The 'Boston model' of managed care and spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study of the outcomes of risk-based, prepaid, managed care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80(11): 1450-1456.
46. Meyers AR, Mitra M, Klein-Walker D, Wilber D, Allen D. Predictors of secondary conditions in a sample of independently-living adults with high-level spinal cord injury. Topics Spinal Cord Injury (Secondary Conditions) 2000; 6(1): 1-8.
47. Sawtooth Software. Ci3 2.0.12c. Sequim, WA: Sawtooth Software, Inc. 1985-1996.
48. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. The SF-36 health survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, 1993.
49. Meyers AR, Andresen EM. Enabling our instruments: Accommodation, universal design, and assured access to participation in research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81(Suppl 2): S5-S9.
50. SPSS Advanced Statistics, Release 9.0. Chicago, IL: SPSS, Inc., 1998.
51. Andresen EM, Rothenberg BM, Kaplan RM. Performance of a self-administered version of the quality of well-being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. Med Care 1998; 36: 1349-1360.
52. Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1986.