Moderated Multiple Regression Tests Are Criterion Specific

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 254-266

  Landis, Ronald S ^a   Dunlap, William P ^b  

^a Tulane University   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041851174     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/109442810033003     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Aguinis, H. (1995). Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. Journal of Management, 21, 1141-1158.
2. Aguinis, H., & Stone-Romero, E. F. (1997). Methodological artifacts in moderated multiple regression and their effects on statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 192-206.
3. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Arnold, H. J. (1982). Moderator variables: A clarification of conceptual, analytic, and psychometric issues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 143-174.
5. Arnold, H. J. (1984). Testing moderator variable hypotheses: A reply to Stone and Hollenbeck. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 214-224.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7. Bateman, T. S., & Strasser, S. (1984). A longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 95-112.
8. Bedeian, A. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1994). Simple question, not so simple answer: Interpreting interaction terms in moderated multiple regression. Journal of Management, 21, 1141-1158.
9. Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549-562.
10. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management, 19, 915-922.
12. Dunlap, W. P., & Kemery, E. R. (1988). Effects of predictor intercorrelations and reliabilities on moderated multiple regression. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 248-258.
13. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-072. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
15. Mason, C. A., Tu, S., & Cauce, A. M. (1996). Assessing moderator variables: Two computer simulation studies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 45-62.
16. Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10, 465-476.
17. Rice, R. W., McFarlin, D. B., Hunt, R. G., & Near, J. P. (1985). Job importance as a moderator of the relationship between job satisfaction and life satisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 6, 297-316.
18. Salgado, J. F. (1998). Sample size in validity studies of personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 71, 161-164.
19. Schmitt, N. W., & Klimoski, R. J. (1991). Research methods in human resource management. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
20. Schmitt, N. W., & Mellon, P. M. (1980). Life and job satisfaction: Is the job central? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 16, 51-58.
21. White, P. F., & Piette, M. J. (1998). The use of "reverse regression" in employment discrimination analysis. Journal of Forensic Economics, 11, 127-138.
22. Wiener, Y., Muczyk, J. P., & Martin, H. J. (1992). Self-esteem and job involvement as moderators of the relationship between work satisfaction and well-being. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 539-554.
23. Williams, L. J., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1989). Longitudinal field methods for studying reciprocal relationships in organizational behavior research: Toward improved causal analysis. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 11, pp. 247-292). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.