Benchmarking as everyday functional assessment in stroke recovery

Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2003, Pages

  Gubrium, Jaber F ^a   Rittman, Maude R ^b   Williams, Christine ^d   Ellen Young, Mary ^c   Boylstein, Craig A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; COMORBIDITY; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOCIAL CLASS; STROKE;

EID: 0041848721     PISSN: 10795014     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/58.4.S203     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Australian Institute of Health & Welfare. (1999). Heart, stroke and vascular diseases, Australian facts. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health & Welfare and the Heart Foundation of Australia.
2. Albrecht, G. L., Fitzpatrick, R., & Scrimshaw, S. C. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of social studies in health & medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Becker, G. (1993). Continuity after a stroke: Implications of life-course disruptions in old age. The Gerontologist, 33, 148-158.
4. Becker, G. (1997). Disrupted lives: How people create meaning in a chaotic world. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Becker, G., & Kaufman, S. R. (1986). Socio-cultural mechanisms of rehabilitation in old age. (Final Report; Grant #AG04053). Washington, DC: National Institute on Aging.
6. Becker, G., & Kaufman, S. R. (1988). Old age, rehabilitation, and research: A review of the issues. The Gerontologist, 28, 459-468.
7. Becker, G., & Kaufman, S. R. (1995). Managing an uncertain illness trajectory in old age: Patients' and physicians' views of stroke. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9, 165-187.
8. Blaxter, M. (1976). The meaning of disability. London: Heinemann.
9. Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4, 167-192.
10. Bury, M. (1996). Defining and researching disability: Challenges and responses. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer. (Eds.), Exploring the divide: Illness and disability, (pp. 17-27). Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
11. Carr, J. H., & Shepherd, R. B. (1982). A motor learning programme for stroke. London: Heinemann.
12. Charmaz, K. (1991). Good days, bad days: The self in chronic illness and time. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
13. Davis, P., Bamford, J., & Warlow, C. (1989). Remedial therapy and functional recovery in a total population. International Disability Studies, 11, 40-44.
14. Doolittle, N. D. (1990). Life after stroke: Survivors' bodily and practical knowledge of coping during recovery. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Francisco.
15. Doolittle, N. D. (1992). The experience of recovery following lacunar stroke. Rehabilitation Nursing, 17, 122-125.
16. Doolittle, N. D. (1994). A clinical ethnography of stroke recovery. In P. Benner (Ed.), Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness, (pp. 211-223). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Douglas, J. D. (Ed.). (1970). Understanding everyday life. Chicago: Aldine.
18. Fujiura, G. T., & Rutkowski-Kmitta, V. (2001). Counting disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 69-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). Time for dying. Chicago: Aldine.
20. Greenhalgh, S. (2002). Under the medical gaze: Facts and fictions of chronic pain. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (Eds.). (2003). Inner lives and social worlds. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Kaufman, S. R. (1988a). Stroke rehabilitation and the negotiation of identity. In S. Reinharz & G. Rowles. (Eds.), Qualitative gerontology, (pp. 82-103). New York: Springer.
23. Kaufman, S. R. (1988b). Illness, biography, and the interpretation of self following a stroke. Journal of Aging Studies, 2, 217-227.
24. Kaufman, S. R. (1988c). Toward a phenomenology of boundaries in medicine: Chronic illness experience in the case of stroke. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 2, 338-354.
25. Kaufman, S. R., & Becker, G. (1986). Stroke: Health care on the periphery. Social Science and Medicine, 22, 983-989.
26. Roth, J. A. (1963). Timetables. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
27. Stineman, M. G., Maislin, G., Fiedler, R. C., & Granger, C. V. (1997). A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke, 28, 550-556.
28. Taub, E., Uswatte, G., & Pidikiti, R. (1999). Constraint-induced movement therapy. A new family of techniques with broad application to physical rehabilitation - a clinical review. Journal of Rehabilitation and Development, 36, 237-251.
29. U.S. Department of Health & Human Resources. (1996). Post-stroke rehabilitation: Clinical practice guidelines. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
30. Üstün, T. B., Chatterji, S., Bickenbach, J. E., Trotter, R. T. II, & Saxena, S. (2001). Disability and cultural variation: The ICIDH-2 cross-cultural applicability research study. In T. B. Üstün, S. Chatterjhi, J. Bickenbach, R. T. Trotter II, R. Room, J. Rehm, & S. Saxena. (Eds.), Disability and culture: Universalism and diversity, (pp. 3-19). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
31. Wade, D. T., & Langton, R. (1987). Functional abilities after stroke: Measurement, natural history and prognosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 50, 177-182.
32. Weigert, A. J. (1981). Sociology of everyday life. New York: Longman.
33. Williams, G. (2001). Theorizing disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 123-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.