The distant core: Social solidarity, social distance and interpersonal ties in core-periphery structures

Social Networks

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 245-260

  Bourgeois, Michael ^a   Friedkin, Noah E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Core periphery; Interpersonal ties; Social distance; Social solidarity

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041834654     PISSN: 03788733     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-8733(01)00033-8     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Amir Y. Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations. Psychological Bulletin. 71:1969;319-342.
2. Blau, P.M., 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. The Free Press, New York.
3. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks. 21:1999;375-395.
4. Breiger R.L. Toward an operational theory of community elite structures. Quality and Quantity. 13:1979;21-57.
5. Breiger R.L., Scott A.B., Phipps A. An algorithm for clustering relational data with application to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 12:1975;328-383.
6. Brown R., James V., Miles H. Changing attitudes through intergroup contact: the effects of group membership salience. European Journal of Social Psychology. 29:1999;741-764.
7. Burt, R.S., 1982. Toward a Structural Theory of Action. Academic Press, New York.
8. Doreian, P., Fararo, T., 1998. The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.
9. Doreian, P., Stokman, F.N., 1997. Evolution of Social Networks. Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.
10. Durkheim, E., 1893. The Division of Labor in Society (translated by George Simpson). The Free Press, New York.
11. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations. 7:1954;117-140.
12. Freeman, L.C., 1979. Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 215-239.
13. Friedkin N.E. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology. 96:1991;1478-1504.
14. Friedkin N.E. Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: a longitudinal case study. American Sociological Review. 58:1993;861-872.
15. Friedkin, N.E., 1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
16. Granovetter M.S. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 78:1973;1360-1380.
17. Heinz, J.P., Edward, O.L., Robert, L.N., Robert, H.S., 1993. The Hollow Core. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
18. Hovland, C.I., Janis, I.L., Kelley, H.H., 1953. Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press, New Haven.
19. Laumann, E.O., 1973. Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. Wiley Interscience, New York.
20. Laumann, E.O., Pappi, F.U., 1976. Networks of Collective Action: a Perspective on Community Influence Systems. Academic Press, New York.
21. McPherson J.M., Ranger-Moore J.R. Evolution on a dancing landscape: organizations and networks in dynamic Blau space. Social Forces. 70:1991;19-42.
22. Skvoretz J. Salience, heterogeneity and consolidation of parameters: civilizing Blau's primitive theory. American Sociological Review. 48:1983;360-375.
23. Wasserman, S., Faust, K., 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
24. White H.C., Scott A.B., Breiger R.L. Social structure from multiple networks. Part I. Block models of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology. 81:1976;730-781.