|
Volumn 116, Issue 1178, 2003, Pages
|
Changes in the pathology reporting of rectal cancer: Is it time to adopt synoptic reporting?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BREAST CANCER;
CANCER LOCALIZATION;
CANCER RECURRENCE;
CANCER STAGING;
CANCER SURGERY;
CANCER SURVIVAL;
CLINICAL PROTOCOL;
COLORECTAL CANCER;
COMORBIDITY;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
EDITORIAL;
HISTOPATHOLOGY;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
MORBIDITY;
POSTOPERATIVE CARE;
POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;
PREDICTION;
PROGNOSIS;
RECTUM BIOPSY;
RECTUM CANCER;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK REDUCTION;
STANDARDIZATION;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TUMOR VOLUME;
MEDICAL RECORD;
METHODOLOGY;
NOTE;
PATHOLOGY;
RECTUM TUMOR;
STANDARD;
HUMANS;
MEDICAL RECORDS;
PATHOLOGY, CLINICAL;
RECTAL NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 0041829040
PISSN: 11758716
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (11)
|
References (10)
|