Quantification of mechanical stabilization for the performance of off-pump coronary artery surgery

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 224-231

  Koransky, Mark L ^a   Tavana, M Lance ^a   Yamaguchi, Atsushi ^a   Kown, Murray H ^a   Miniati, Douglas N ^a   Nowlin, William ^a   Robbins, Robert C ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CARDIOVASCULAR PERFORMANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY; CORONARY ARTERY SURGERY; HEART BEAT; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART MOVEMENT; HEART OUTPUT; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STERNOTOMY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY VESSELS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; IMMOBILIZATION; MOVEMENT; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; SWINE;

EID: 0041828578     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Akpinar B, Guden M, Sagbas E, Sanisoglu I, Aytekin V, Bayindir O. 2000. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with use of the Octopus 2 stabilization system. Heart Surg Forum 3:282-6.
2. Amano A, Hirose H, Takahashi A, Nagano N. 2001. Off-pump coronary artery bypass: mid-term results. Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 49:67-78.
3. Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Mariani MA. 1997. Local immobilization of the left anterior descending artery for minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 63(suppl):S76-8.
4. Borst C, Jansen EW, Tulleken CA, et al. 1996. Coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass and without interruption of native coronary flow using a novel anastomosis site restraining device ("Octopus"). J Am Coll Cardiol 27:1356-64.
5. Bowles BJ, Lee JD, Dang CR, et al. 2001. Coronary artery bypass performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass is associated with reduced cerebral microemboli and improved clinical results. Chest 119:25-30.
6. Burfeind WR Jr, Duhaylongsod FG, Samuelson D, Leone BJ. 1998. The effects of mechanical cardiac stabilization on left ventricular performance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14:285-9.
7. [DHHS] Department of Health and Human Services. 1985. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health. Publication 86-23.
8. Diegeler A, Falk V, Matin M, et al. 1998. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting: experience with the CTS system approach. Perfusion 13:237-42.
9. Diegeler A, Matin M, Kayser S, et al. 1999. Angiographic results after minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting using the minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting (MIDCAB) approach. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15:680-4.
10. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, et al. 1999. Endoscopic coronary arter bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system. Heart Surg Forum 2:199-205.
11. Grundeman PF, Borst C, van Herwaarden JA, Mansvelt Beck HJ, Jansen EW. 1997. Hemodynamic changes during displacement of the beating heart by the Utrecht Octopus method. Ann Thorac Surg 63(suppl):S88-92.
12. Grundeman PF, Borst C, van Herwaarden, JA, Verlaan CW, Jansen EW. 1998. Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the Octopus tissue stabilizer: influence on coronary flow. Ann Thorac Surg 65:1348-52.
13. Grundeman PF, Borst C, Verlaan CW, Meijburg H, Moues CM, Jansen EW. 1999. Exposure of circumflex branches in the tilted, beating porcine heart: echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular deformation and the effect of right or left heart bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:316-23.
14. Grundeman PF. 1998. Vertical displacement of the beating heart by the Utrecht Octopus tissue stabilizer: effects on haemodynamics and coronary flow. Perfusion 13:229-30.
15. Holubkov P, Zenati M, Akin JJ, Erb L, Courcoulas A. 1998. MIDCAB characteristics and results: the CardioThoracic Systems (CTS) registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 14(suppl 1):S25-30.
16. Jansen EW, Grundeman PF, Borst C, et al. 1997. Less invasive off-pump CABG using a suction device for immobilization: the 'Octopus' method. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 12:406-12.
17. Jansen EW, Grundeman PF, Mansvelt Beck HJ, Heijman RH, Borst C. 1997. Experimental off-pump grafting of a circumflex branch via sternotomy using a suction device. Ann Thorac Surg 63(suppl):S93-6.
18. Jansen EW, Lahpor JR, Borst C, Grundeman PF, Bredee JJ. 1998. Off-pump coronary bypass grafting: how to use the Octopus Tissue Stabilizer. Ann Thorac Surg 66:576-9.
19. Kolessov VI. 1967. Mammary artery-coronary artery anastomosis as method of treatment for angina pectoris. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 54:535-44.
20. Mack MJ, Acuff T, Osborne J. 1998. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass: technical considerations and instrumentation. J Card Surg 13:290-6.
21. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, et al. 2001. Computer-enhanced "robotic" cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:842-53.
22. Nierich AP, Diephuis J, Jansen EW, Borst C, Knape JT. 2000. Heart displacement during off-pump CABG: how well is it tolerated? Ann Thorac Surg 70:466-72.
23. Omeroglu SN, Kirali K, Guler M, et al. 2000. Midterm angiographic assessment of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 70:844-9.
24. Puskas JD, Thourani VH, Marshall JJ, et al. 2001. Clinical outcomes, angiographic patency, and resource utilization in 200 consecutive off-pump coronary bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 71:1477-84.
25. Spooner TH, Hart JC, Pym J. 1999. A two-year, three institution experience with the Medtronic Octopus: systematic off-pump surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 68:1478-81.