Do mental health professionals really understand probability? Implications for risk assessment and evidence-based practice

Journal of Mental Health

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 417-430

  Gale, Tim M ^a,b   Hawley, Chris J ^a,b   Sivakumaran, Thanusha ^a  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH II HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evidence based practice; Mental health professional; Probability; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORY; TRAINING;

EID: 0041823516     PISSN: 09638237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963823031000153457     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Biehl, M. & Halpern-Felsher, B.L. (2001). Adolescents' and adults' understanding of probability expressions. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28, 30-35.
2. Bogardus, S.T., Holmboe, E. & Jekel, J.F. (1999). Perils, pitfalls and possibilities in talking about medical risk. JAMA, 281, 1037-1041.
3. Department of Health (1995). Building Bridges: a Guide to Arrangements for Inter-Agency Working for the Care and Protection of Severely Mentally Ill People. London: DoH White Paper.
4. Department of Health (1994). Guidance on the Discharge of Mentally Disordered People and their Continuing Care in the Community. London: DoH White Paper.
5. Department of Transport (2001). National Travel Survey, DoT publication.
6. Dillon, J. & Gill, P. (2001). Risk, environment and health: aspects of policy and practice. School Science Review, 83, 65-73.
7. Edwards, A.G.K. & Elwyn, G.J. (2001). Risks listen and don't mislead: editorial. British Journal of General Practice, April 2001.
8. Edwards, A.G.K., Elwyn, G.J., Covey, J., Matthews, E. & Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information - a review of the effects of 'framing' and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6, 61-82.
9. Fuller, R., Dudley, N. & Blacktop, J. (2001). Risk communication and older people - understanding of probability and risk information by medical inpatients aged 75 years and older. Age and Ageing, 30, 473-476.
10. Gale, T.M., Woodward, A., Hawley, C.J., Hayes, J., Sivakumaran, T. & Hansen, G. (2002). Risk assessment for people with mental health problems: a pilot study of reliability in working practice. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical practice, 6, 73-81.
11. HMSO (1995). Mental Health (Patients in the community) Act. London, HMSO.
12. Kahneman, D. & Tversy, A. (1972). Subjective probability: a judgement of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430-454.
13. Kirkwood, A.S. (1994). Why do we worry when scientists say there is no risk? Disaster Prevention and Management, 3, 15-22.
14. Marteau, T.M., Senior, V. & Sasieni, P. (2001). Women's understanding of a 'normal smear test result': experimental questionnaire based study. British Medical Journal, 322, 526-528.
15. Montandon, C. & Harding, T. (1984). The reliability of dangerousness assessments: a decision making exercise. British Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 149-155.
16. O'Connor, A.M., Rostom, A., Fiset, V., Tetroe, J., Entwistle, V., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Holmes-Rovner, M., Barry, M. & Jones, J. (1999). Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. British Medical Journal, 319, 731-734.
17. Ryan, T. (1998). Perceived risks associated with mental illness: beyond homicide and suicide. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 287-297.
18. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.