Factors determining long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation;Kardiowersja elektryczna przetrwałego migotania przedsionków: Czynniki warunkuja̧ce odległe utrzymanie rytmu zatokowego

Kardiologia Polska

Volumn 59, Issue 8, 2003, Pages 128-141

  Kosior, Dariusz ^a,c   Szulc, Marcin ^a   Pia̧tkowski, Radosław ^a   Rabczenko, Daniel ^b   Torbicki, Adam ^d   Opolski, Grzegorz ^a   Kasprzak, Jarosław D ^e  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF HYGIENE   (Poland)

^c WARSZAWSKI UNIWERSYTET MEDYCZNY   (Poland)

^d INSTYTUT GRU LICY I CHORÓB P UC   (Poland)

^e Klinika Kardiologii   (Poland)

Author keywords

Echocardiography; Persistent atrial fibrillation; Prediction; Sinus rhythm

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANTICOAGULATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOVERSION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HOLTER MONITORING; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK FACTOR; SINUS RHYTHM; STROKE;

EID: 0041817707     PISSN: 00229032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Coplen S.E., Antman E.M., Berlin J.A. et al.: Efficacy and safety of quinidine therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circulation 1990, 82, 1106-1116.
2. Opolski G., Torbicki A., Kosior D. et al.: Czy przywracać rytm zatokowy u chorych z przewlekłym migotaniem przedsionków? - wstȩpne wyniki polskiego badania HOT CAFE. Pol. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999, 5, 413-418.
3. Kosior D., Karpiński G., Wretowski D. et al.: Sequential antarrhythmic therapy for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation - one year follow-up. Kardiol. Pol. 2002, 56(4), 361-368.
4. Reiffel J.A.: Drug choices in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2000, 85, 12D-19D.
5. Laupacis A., Albers G., Dalen J. et al.: Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation. Chest 1995, 108, 352-359.
6. Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-Dimentional Echocardiography. Circulation 1980, 62, 212-228.
7. Gold R.L., Haffajee C.I., Charos G. et al.: Amiodarone for refractory atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 1986, 57, 124-127.
8. Hall J.I., Wood D.R.: Factors affecting cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias with special reference to quinidine. Br. Heart J. 1968, 30, 84-90.
9. Waris E., Kreus K., Salokannel J. et al.: Factors influencing the persistence of sinus rhythm after DC shock treatment of atrial fibrillation. Acta Med. Scand. 1971, 189, 161-166.
10. Morris J.J.J., Peter R.H., McIntosh H.D.: Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: immediate and long-term results and selection of patients. Ann. Intern. Med. 1966, 65, 216-231.
11. Brodsky M.A., Allen B.J., Capparelli E. V. et al.: Factors determining maintenance of sinus rhythm after chronic atrial fibrillation with left atrial dilatation. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989, 63, 1065-1068.
12. Suttorp M.J., Kingma J.H., Koomen E.M. et al.: Recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or flutter after successful cardioversion in patients with normal left ventricular function. Am. J. Cardiol. 1993, 71, 710-713.
13. Van Gelder I.C., Crijns, H.J.G.M., Van Glist W.H. et al.: Prediction of uneventful cardioversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm direct current cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am. J. Cardiol. 1991, 68, 41-46.
14. Brodsky M.A., Allen B.J., Walker C.J. et al.: Amiodarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm after conversion of atrial fibrillation in the setting of dilated left atrium. Am. J. Cardiol. 1987, 60, 572-575.
15. Vitolo E,. Tronci M., Larovere M.T. et al.: Amiodarone versus quinidine in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation. Acta Cardiol. 1981, 86, 431-444.
16. Gold R.L., Haffajee C.I., Charos G. et al.: Amiodarone for refractory atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 1986, 57, 124-127.
17. Ewy G., Ulfers L., Hager W.D. et al.: Response of atrial fibrillation to therapy: role of etiology and left atrial diameter. J. Electrocardiol. 1980, 13, 119-124.
18. Duytschaever M., Haerynck F., Tavernier R. et al.: Factors influencing long-term persistence of sinus rhythm after a first electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 1998, 21, 284-287.
19. Klein A.L., Grimm R.A., Black I.W. et al.: Cardioversion guided by transesophageal echocardiography: The ACUTE pilot study, a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 1997, 126, 200-209.
20. Henry W.L., Morganroth J., Pearlman A.S. et al.: Relation between echocardiographically determined left atrial size and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 1976, 53, 273-279.
21. Hoglund C., Rosenhamer G.: Echocardiographic left atrial dimension as predictor of maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Acta Med. Scand. 1985, 217, 411-415.
22. Dethy M., Chassat C., Roy D. et al.: Doppler echocardiographic predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation after cardioversion. Am. J. Cardiol. 1988, 62, 723-726.
23. Dittrich H.C., Erickson J.S., Schneiderman T. et al.: Echocardiographic and clinical predictors for outcome of elective cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989, 63, 193-197.
24. Flugelman M.Y., Hasin Y., Katznelson N. et al.: Restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm after mitral valve surgery for mitral stenosis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1984, 54, 617-619.
25. Hohnloser S.F., Kuck K.H., Lilienthal J.: Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation - Pharmacological Intervention In Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomized trial. Lancet 2000, 356, 1789-1794.
26. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. The Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1825-1833.
27. Van Gelder I.C., Hagens V.E., Bosker H.A. et al.: A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 1834-1840.
28. Opolski G., Torbicki A., Kosior D. et al.: Rate control versus rhythm control in patients with nonvalvular chronic atrial fibrillation: the result of HOT CAFE Polish study. Eur. Heart J. 2002, 23, 486.