Community genetics and community selection

Ecology

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 586-588

  Wilson, David Sloan ^a   Swenson, William ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SELECTION;

EID: 0041813327     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[0586:CGACS]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Antonovics, J. 1992. Toward community genetics. Pages 426-449 in R. S. Fritz and E. L. Simms. editors, Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Illinois, USA.
2. Goodnight, C. J. 1990a. Experimental studies of community evolution I: the response to selection at the community level. Evolution 44:1614-1624.
3. Goodnight, C. J. 1990b. Experimental studies of community evolution II: the ecological basis of the response to community selection. Evolution 44:1625-1636.
4. Goodnight, C. J., and L. Stevens. 1997. Experimental studies of group selection: what do they tell us about group selection in nature? American Naturalist 150:S59-S79.
5. Miller, T. E., and J. Travis. 1996. The evolutionary role of indirect effects in communities. Ecology 77:1329-1335.
6. Muir, W. M. 1995. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poultry Sciene 75:447-458.
7. Neuhauser. C., D. A. Andow, G. E. Heimpel, G. May, R. G. Shaw, and S. Wagenius. 2003. Community genetics: expanding the synthesis of ecology and genetics. Ecology 84: 545-558.
8. Swenson, W., J. Arendt, and D. S. Wilson. 2000a. Artificial selection of microbial ecosystems for 3-chloroaniline bio-degradation. Environmental Microbiology 2:564-571.
9. Swenson, W., D. S. Wilson, and R. Elias. 2000b. Artificial ecosystem selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 97:9110-9114.
10. Wade, M. J. 1976. Group selection among laboratory populations of Tribolium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 73:4604-4607.
11. Whitham, T. G., W. Young, G. D. Martinsen, C. A. Gehring, J. A. Schwaitzer, S. M. Shuster, G. M. Wimp, D. G. Fischer, J. K. Bailey, R. L. Lindroth, S. Woolbright, and C. Kuske. 2003. Community genetics: a consequence of the extended phenotype. Ecology 84:559-573.
12. Wilson, D. S. 1992. The effect of complex interactions on variation between units of a metacommunity, with implications for biodiversity and higher levels of selection. Ecology 73:1984-2000.
13. Wilson, D. S. 1997. Biological communities as functionally organized units. Ecology 78:2018-2024.
14. Wilson, D. S., and W. G. Knollenberg. 1987. Adaptive indirect effects: the fitness of burying beetles with and without their phoretic mites. Evolutionary Ecology 1:139-159.
15. Wooton, J. T. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 25:443-466.