British manufacturing financial performance, 1950-79: Implications for the productivity debate and the post-war consensus

Business History

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 52-71

  Higgins, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONVERGENCE; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; MANUFACTURING; PRODUCTIVITY; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 0041811620     PISSN: 00076791     EISSN: 17437938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713999322     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. S. Broadberry, The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850-1990 (Cambridge, 1997), Tables 4.3, 4.4. 4.5, pp.53-6.
2. K. Williams, J. Williams and D. Thomas, Why are the British Bad at Manufacturing? (London, 1983), Table 3, pp.116-17.
3. Y. Cassis, Big Business: The European Experience in the Twentieth Century (Oxford, 1997), Table 4.6, p.87.
4. W.E. Martin, The Economics of the Profits Crisis (London, 1981)
5. G. Meeks, 'Profit Illusion', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol.36 (1974), pp.267-85
6. M. Panic and R.E. Close, 'Profitability of British Manufacturing Industry', Lloyds Bank Review (July 1973), pp.17-30;
7. J.S. Fleming et al., 'The Cost of Capital, Finance and Investment', Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin (June 1976), pp. 193-205;
8. "Trends in Company Profitability', Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin (March 1976), pp.36-52
9. J.R. Sargent, 'Productivity and Profits in UK Manufacturing', Midland Bank Review (Autumn 1979), pp.7-13;
10. M.A. King, 'The United Kingdom Profits Crisis: Myth or Reality?', Economic Journal, Vol.85 (1975), pp.33-54;
11. T.P. Hill, Profits and Rates of Return (OECD, 1979). It should be emphasised at this juncture that these studies have generally failed to generate a consistent view on profitability because of the different definitions used.
12. A. Singh and G. Whittington, Growth, Profitability and Valuation (Cambridge, 1968);
13. G. Whittington, The Prediction of Profitability and other Studies of Company Behaviour (Cambridge, 1971);
14. W.E. Eltis, 'How Low Profitability and Weak Innovativeness Undermined UK Industrial Growth', Economic Journal, Vol. 106 (1996), pp.184-95.
15. J. Froud, C. Haslam, S. Johal and K. Williams. 'Shareholder Value and Financialisation: Consultancy Promises, Management Moves', Economy and Society, Vol.29 (2000), pp.80-110.
16. J.B. Barney, 'Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage', Journal of Management, Vol.17 (1991), pp.99-120;
17. J. Barney, M. Wright, and D.J. Ketchen, 'The Resource Based View of the Firm: Ten Years after 1991', Journal of Management, Vol.27 (2001), pp.625-50
18. N. Foss, Resources, Firms and Strategies (Oxford, 1997
19. 'Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives', Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol.3 (1993), pp.127-44;
20. A. McWilliams and D.L. Smart, 'The Resource Based View of the Firm: Does it go Far Enough in Shedding the Assumptions of the SCP Paradigm?', Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol.4 (1995), pp.309-16;
21. M.A. Peteraf, 'The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource Based View', Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14 (1993), pp.179-91;
22. A. Cairncross, 'Economic Policy and Performance, 1945-1964', and 'Economic Policy and Performance, 1964-1990', in R. Floud and D.N. McCloskey (eds.), The Economic History of Britain Since 1700 (Cambridge, 1994), Vol.3, pp.32-95
23. J. Tomlinson, Public Policy and the Economy Since 1900 (Oxford, 1990), chapters 7-11.
24. N.F.R. Crafts, 'Reversing Relative Economic Decline? The 1980s in Historical Perspective', Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol.7 (1991), pp.81-98;
25. S.N. Broadberry and N.F.R. Crafts, 'Britain's Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors', Journal of Economic History, Vol.52 (1992). pp.531-58
26. S.N. Broadberry and N.F.R. Crafts, 'British Economic Policy and Industrial Performance in the Early Post-War Period'. Business History, Vol.38 (1996), pp.65-91;
27. S. Broadberry and N.F.R. Crafts, 'Competition and Innovation in 1950s Britain', Business History, Vol.43 (2001), pp.97-118.
28. J.D. Smith, The Attlee and Churchill Administrations and Industrial Unrest. 1945-55 (London, 1990), pp.1-9.
29. H. Mercer, 'Anti-Monopoly Policy', in H. Mercer, N. Rollings and J.D. Tomlinson (eds.). Labour Governments and Private Industry: The Experience of 1945-1951 (Edinburgh, 1992), p.58.
30. J.G. Walshe, 'Industrial Organisation', in N.F.R. Crafts and N. Woodward (eds.), The British Economy Since 1945 (Oxford, 1991), pp.361-2.
31. J. Tomlinson and N. Tiratsoo, '"An Old Story, Freshly Told?" A Comment on Broadberry and Crafts' Approach to Britain's Early Post-War Economic Performance', Business History. Vol.40 (1998), pp.62-72.
32. S.N. Broadberry and N.F.R. Crafts, 'The Post-War Settlement: Not Such a Good Bargain After All', Business History. Vol.40 (1998), pp.73-9.
33. J.J. Hughes and A.P. Thirlwall, 'Trends and Cycles in Import Penetration in the UK', Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol.39 (1977), p.307.
34. D.M. Higgins and J.S. Toms, 'Public Subsidy and Private Divestment: The Lancashire Cotton Textile Industry, c.1950-c. 1965', Business History, Vol.42 (2000), pp.59-84;
35. 'Capital Ownership, Capital Structure, and Capital Markets: Financial Constraints and the Decline of the Lancashire Cotton Textile Industry, 1880-1965', Journal of Industrial History, Vol.4 (2001). pp.48-64.
36. C.H. Lee, 'Corporate Behaviour in Theory and History: II. The Historian's Perspective', Business History, Vol.32 (1990), pp.157-79.
37. A.D. Chandler, Scale and Scope (Cambridge, MA, 1990), pp.8, 36.
38. F.M. Fisher and J.J. McGowan, 'On the Misuse of Accounting Rates of Return Ratio to Infer Monopoly Power', American Economic Review, Vol.73 (1983), pp.82-97.
39. A. Steele, 'Further Notes on Estimating Economic Returns from Published Accounting Returns', Journal of Business Finance and Accounting. Vol.22 (1995), pp.923-38.
40. G. Whittington, 'On the Use of the Accounting Rate of Return in Empirical Research', Accounting and Business Research. Vol.9 (1979), p.202.
41. J. Wilson, British Business History, 1720-1994 (Manchester. 1995), p.216.
42. S. Prais, The Evolution of Giant Firms in Britain (Cambridge, 1976), Table 1.1, p.4.
43. O.E. Williamson, 'Markets and Hierarchies: Some Elementary Considerations', American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, Vol.63 (1973), pp.316-25;
44. 'The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes', Journal of Economic Literature. Vol.19 (1981), pp.137-68.
45. G.C. Reid, Theories of Industrial Organisation (Oxford, 1987). pp.198-200.
46. D.C. Elliot and J.D. Gribbin, 'The Abolition of Cartels and Structural Change in the United Kingdom', in A.P. Jacquemin and H.W. de Jong (eds.), Welfare Aspects of Industrial Markets (Leiden, 1977), pp.350-51.
47. P.A. Geroski, 'Innovation, Technological Opportunity, and Market Structure', Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.42 (1990), pp.586-602;
48. S. Nickell, 'Competition and Corporate Performance', Journal of Political Economy, Vol.104 (1996), pp.724-46.
49. S. Nickell et al., 'What Makes Firms Perform Well?', European Economic Review, Vol.41 (1997), pp.783-96.