Gis‐based gap analysis of an existing marine reserve network around santa catalina island

Marine Geodesy

Volumn 20, Issue 2-3, 1997, Pages 205-234

  Bushing, William W ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Santa Catalina Island Conservancy   (United States)

Author keywords

California; Gap analysis; Geographic information system; Giant kelp; GIS; Macrocystis pyrifera; Marine reserves; Persistence; Santa Catalina Island

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041801837     PISSN: 01490419     EISSN: 1521060X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490419709388106     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abbott, I., and G. Hollenberg. 1976.Marine algae of California.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Ambrose, R. F., J. M. Engle, J. A. Coyer, and B. V. Nelson. 1993. Changes in urchin and kelp densities at Anacapa Island. In F. G. Hochberg (ed.).Proc. 3rd California Islands Symp.: Recent advances in research on the California Islands, pp. 199-209. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
3. Augenstein, E. W., D. A. Stow, and A. S. Hope. 1991. Evaluation of SPOT HRV-XS data for kelp resource inventories.Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing57(5): 501-509.
4. Bazzaz, F. A. 1983. Characteristics of populations in relation to disturbance in natural and man-modified ecosystems. In H. A. Mooney and M. Godron (eds.), Disturbances and ecosystems, components of response, pp. 259-275. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Belsher, T., and M. C. Mouchot. 1990. Apports d'images satellitaires a la gestion des populations deMacrocystis pyriferaGolfe de Morbihan-Arcbipel de Kerguelen. Canada Centre for Remote Sensing.
6. Belsher, T., and M. C. Mouchot. 1992. Evaluation, par teledetection satellitaire, des stocks deMacrocystis pyriferadans le golfe du Morbihan (archipe! de Kerguelan).Oceanologica Acta15(3): 297-307.
7. Bishop, O. N., 1984.Statistics for biology.Essex, England: Longman House.
8. Bushing, W. W. 1994. The influence of topography on the distribution of giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera) beds around Santa Catalina Island using a geographic information system. In W. L. Halvorson and G. J. Maender (eds.).The Fourth California Islands Symp.: Update on the status of resources, pp. 70-82, Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
9. Bushing, W. W. 1995. Identifying regions of persistent giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera)around
10. Bushing, W. W., 1996a. The influence of island topography on the nearshore light regime and the distribution of giant kelp around Santa Catalina Island.Proc. 16th ESRI user Conf, Palm Springs, CA, 20-24 May 1996.
11. Bushing, W. W. 1996b. The use of satellite remote sensing and a geographic information system (GIS) to characterize regions of persistent giant kelp(Macrocystis pyrifera)around Santa Catalina Island for designation as marine reserves. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
12. CoastWatch. 1995. Sea surface temperature digital data obtained via FTP from NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) CoastWatch Program, West Coast Regional Node, National Marine Fisheries Service, La Jolla, CA 92038.
13. Connell, J. H., and W. P. Sousa. 1983. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence.Am. Nat.121:789-824.
14. Dayton, P. K., and M. J. Tegner. 1984. Catastrophic storms, El Nino and patch stability in a southern California kelp community.Science224: 283-285.
15. Dayton, P. K., M. J. Tegner, P. E. Parnell, and P. B. Edwards. 1992. Temporal and spatial patterns of disturbance and recovery in a kelp forest community.Ecol. Monogr.62(3): 421 — 445.
16. Deysher, L. E. 1993. Evaluation of remote sensing techniques for monitoring giant kelp populations.Hydrobiologia260/261: 307-312.
17. Earle, S. 1980. Undersea world of a kelp forest.Natl. Geogr., September: 411-426.
18. Eastman, J. R. 1993.IDRJSI version 4.1 update manual.Clark University Graduate School of Geography, Worcester, MA.
19. Engle, J. M. 1994. Perspectives on the structure and dynamics of nearshore marine assemblages of the California Channel Islands. In W. L. Halvorson and G. J. Maender (eds.).The Fourth California Islands Symp.: Update on the status of resources, pp. 13-26. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
20. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1981. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology.BioScience31(10): 733-740.
21. Forman, R. T. T., and M. Godron. 1983. Landscape modification and changing ecological characteristics. In H. A. Mooney and M. Godron (eds.), Disturbances and ecosystems, components of response, pp. 12-28. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22. Foster, M., and D. Schiel. 1985. The ecology of giant kelp forests in California: A community profile. U.S. Fish Wildlife Serv. Biol. Rep. 85 (7.2).
23. Gerard, V. A. 1984. Physiological effects of El Nino on giant kelp in southern California.Mar. Biol. Lett.5: 317-322.
24. Gore, J. A., J. R. Kelly, and J. D. Yount. 1990. Application of ecological theory to determining recovery potential of disturbed Iotic ecosystems: Research needs and priorities.Environ. Man.14(5): 755-762.
25. Hagen, N. T. 1983. Destructive grazing of kelp beds by sea urchins in Vestfjorden, Northern Norway.Sarsia68: 177-190.
26. Harger, B.W. 1983. A historical overview of kelp in southern California. In W. Bascom (ed.), The effects of waste disposal on kelp communities. California Sea Grant Symp.
27. Harrold, C., and D. Reed. 1985. Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure.Ecology66: 1160-1169.
28. Hodder, D., and M. Mel. 1978. Kelp survey of the Southern California Bight. Esca-Tech Corp. and Science Applications, Inc., Tech. Rep. Vol. Ill—Rep. 1.4 to the Bureau of Land Management (Year II SCOCS Program), Contract AA550-CT6-40, La Jolla, CA.
29. Holland, P. G., and D. G. Steyn. 1975. Vegetational responses to latitudinal variations in slope angle and aspect.J. Biogeogr. 2:179-183.
30. Jackson, G. A. 1977. Nutrients and production of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, off southern California.Limnol. Oceanogr.22: 979-995.
31. Jensen, J., J. Estes, and M. Mel. 1979. Multispectral kelp resource surveys. In Proc. 5th Annual William T. Pecora Mem. Symp. on remote sensing, pp. 533-542.
32. Jensen, J., J. Estes, and J. Scepan. 1987. Monitoring changes in giant kelp distribution using digital remote sensor data.Photo-Interpretation(France) 1987-1(4): 25-29.
33. Jensen, J., J. Estes, and L. Tinney. 1980. Remote sensing techniques for kelp surveys.Photogram. Eng. Remote Sensing 46(6):743-755.
34. Jensen, J., L. Tinney, and J. Estes. 1976. Maximum likelihood classification of kelp resources(Macrocystis pyrifera)from Landsat computer compatible tapes. InProc. 2nd Annual William T. Pecora Mem. Symp. on remote sensing, pp. 201-208.
35. Kennelly, S. J., and A. J. Underwood. 1993. Geographic consistencies of effects of experimental physical disturbance on understory species in sublittoral kelp forests in central New South Wales.J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol.168(1): 35-58.
36. Krcho, J. 1991. Georelief as a subsystem of landscape and the influence of morphometric parameters of georelief on spatial differentiation of landscape-ecological parameters.Ekologia(CSFR) 10(2): 115-157.
37. Lawrence, J. M. 1975. On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins.Ann. Rev. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.13: 213-286.
38. Leighton, D. L., L. G. Jones, and W. J. North. 1966. Ecological relationships between giant kelp and sea urchins in southern California.Proc. Intl. Seaweed Symp.5: 141-153.
39. Levins, R. 1970. Extinction.Lect. Math. Life Sci. 2:75-107.
40. Mann, K. H., and P. A. Breen. 1972. The relationship between lobster abundance, sea urchins and kelp beds.J. Fish. Res. Board Can.29: 603-605.
41. McAlary, F. A., and W. N. McFarland. 1994. Catalina Island kelp forests:1992-1993.In W. L. Halvorson and G. J. Maender (eds.).The Fourth California Islands Symp.: Update on the status of resources, pp. 35-44. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History.
42. Neushul Mariculture, Inc. 1981. Historical review of kelp beds in the southern California Bight. Southern California Edison Company Res. Rep. Ser. No. 81-RD-98.
43. North, W. J. 1968. Effects of canopy cutting on kelp growth: Comparison of experimentation with theory. InUtilization of Kelp-bed Resources in Southern California.Dept, of Fish and Game Fish Bulletin 139, pp. 223-254.
44. North, W. J. 1971. The biology of giant kelp beds (Macrocystis) in California.Beihefte Zur Nova Hedwigia, Vol. 32.
45. North, W. J. 1991.The kelp beds of San Diego and Orange Counties.Published by Wheeler J. North, March 15.
46. North, W. J., and J. S. Pearse. 1970. Sea urchin population explosion in southern California coastal waters.Science167: 209.
47. Norton, J., D. McLain, R. Brainard, and D. Husby. 1985. The 1982-1983 El Nino event off Baja and Alta California and its ocean climate context. In W. S. Wooster and D. L. Fluharty (eds.), •El Nino North: Nino effects in the Eastern Subarctic Pacific Ocean, pp. 44-72. Washington Sea Grant Program, Seattle, WA: University of Washington.
48. O’Reilly, W. C., and R. T. Guza. 1993. A comparison of two spectral wave models in the southern California Bight.Coastal Eng.19: 263-282.
49. Pearsons, T. N., and H. W. Li. 1992. Influence of habitat complexity on resistance to flooding and resilience of stream fish assemblages.Trans. Am. Fish. Soc.121:427-436.
50. Pond, S., and G. L. Pickard. 1983.Introductory dynamical oceanography.New York: Pergamon Press.
51. Quast, J. C. 1971. Some physical aspects of the inshore environment, particularly as it affects kelp bed fishes. In W. J. North (ed.). The biology of giant kelp beds(Macrocystis)in California.Beihefte Zur Nova Hedwigia 32: 228-240.
52. Rabinowitz, D., J. K. Rapp, S. Caims, and M. Mayer. 1989. The persistence of rare prairie grasses •n Missouri: Environmental variation buffered by reproductive output of sparse species.Am. Naturalist134(4): 525-544.
53. Reed, D. C., and M. S. Foster. 1984. The effects of canopy shading on algal recruitment and growth in a giant kelp forest.Ecology65(3): 937-948.
54. Reice, S. R., R. C. Wissmar, and R. J. Naiman. 1990. Disturbance regimes, resilience, and recovery in animal communities and habitats in lotic ecosystems.Environ. Man.14(5): 647-659.
55. Richards, D. V., D. Kushner, and W. Avery. 1993. Kelp forest monitoring—Channel Islands National Park (1990 annual report). Tech. Rep. NPS/ERUC/NRTR-93/05. Davis, CA (University of California) National Park Service.
56. Ripple, W. J., G. A. Bradshaw, and T. A. Spies. 1991. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA.Biol. Conserv.57(1991): 73-88.
57. Santetices, B., and F. P. Ojeda. 1984. Effects of canopy removal on the understory algal community structure of coastal forests ofMacrocystis pyriferafrom southern South America.Mar. Ecol.-Progr. Ser.14(2): 165-173.
58. Scott, J. M., F. Davis, B. Csuti, R. Noss, B. Butterfield, C. Groves, H. Anderson, S. Caicco, F. D’Erchia, T. C. Edwards, Jr., J. Ulliman, and R. G. Wright. 1993. Wildlife Monograph #123: A publication of the Wildlife Society. Gap analysis: A geographic approach to protection of biological diversity. Supplement of theJournal of Wildlife Management57(1), January
59. Seymour, R., M. Tegner, P. Dayton, and P. Parnell. 1989. Storm wave induced mortality of giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera.in southern California.Estuarine, Coastal Shelf Sci.28: 277-292.
60. Sousa, W. P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communities.Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst.15: 353-391.
61. Starr, J., and J. Estes. 1990.Geographic Information Systems: An Introduction.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
62. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 1979. California marine waters: Areas of special biological significance, reconnaissance survey report, Santa Catalina Island—Subarea I, Los Angeles County. Water Quality Monitoring Rep. No. 79-6, April. State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Planning and Research, Surveillance and Monitoring Section.
63. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 1981. California marine waters: Areas of special biological significance, reconnaissance survey report, Santa Catalina Island—Subarea II, north end of Little Harbor to Ben Weston Point and Subarea IV, Binnacle Rock to Jewfish Point, Los Angeles County. Water Quality Monitoring Rep. No. 81-10, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Planning and Research, Surveillance and Monitoring Section. October.
64. Steinman, A. D., P. J. Mulholland, A. V. Palumbo, T. F. Flum, and D. L. DeAngelis. 1991. Resilience of lotic ecosystems to a light-elimination disturbance.Ecology72(4): 1299-1313.
65. Stevens, J. 1994. Twenty year database of fish off Los Angeles. Emeritus professor, Occidental College, Los Angeles. Seminar talk at the University of California, Santa Barbara, May 2.
66. Tegner, M. J. 1980. Multispecies considerations of resource management in southern California kelp beds. In J. D. Pringle, G. J. Sharp, and J. F. Caddy (eds.), Proc. Workshop on the relationships between sea urchin grazing and commercial plant/animal harvesting.Can. Tech. Rep., Fisheries and Aquatic Sci.954: 125-143.
67. Wallace, J. B. 1990. Recovery of lotic macroinvertebrate communities from disturbance.Environmental Management.14(5): 605-620.
68. Weaver, M., and M. Kellman. 1981. The effects of forest fragmentation on woodlot tree biotas in Southern Ontario.J. Biogeogr.8(1981): 199-210.
69. Wilkinson, L., M. Hill, J. P. Welna, and G. K. Birkenbeuel. 1992.Systat, the system for statistics.Evanston, IL: Systat, Inc.
70. Zimmerman, R. C., and J. N. Kremer. 1984. Episodic nutrient supply to a kelp forest ecosystem in Southern California.Jour. Mar. Res.42:591-604.