Comparative development of Eimeria tenella (Apicomplexa) in host cells in vitro

Parasitology Research

Volumn 90, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 301-304

  Tierney, J ^a   Mulcahy, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; APICOMPLEXA; ARTICLE; CELL LINE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EIMERIA TENELLA; HOST CELL; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; INCUBATION TIME; LIFE CYCLE; NONHUMAN; PARASITE DEVELOPMENT; PARASITE VIRULENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SPOROZOITE; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE;

ANIMALS; CACO-2 CELLS; CATS; CATTLE; CELL LINE; CERCOPITHECUS AETHIOPS; CRICETINAE; DOGS; EIMERIA TENELLA; HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS; HUMANS; PARASITOLOGY; RABBITS; RATS; TEMPERATURE; VERO CELLS;

ANIMALIA; APICOMPLEXA; EIMERIA; EIMERIA TENELLA; PROTOZOA;

EID: 0041766748     PISSN: 09320113     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-003-0846-1     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Augustine PC (2001) Cell:sporozoite interactions and invasion by apicomplexan parasites of the genus Eimeria. Int J Parasitol 31:1-8
2. Chai JY, Lee SH, Kim WH, Yun CK (1989) Development of Eimeria tenella in MDBK cell culture with a note on enhancing effect of preincubation with chicken spleen cells. Kisaengchunghak Chapchi 27:87-100
3. Cox FE (1998) Control of coccidiosis: lessons from other sporozoa. Int J Parasitol 28:165-179
4. Doran DJ (1970) Effect of age and freezing on development of Eimeria adenoeides and E. tenella sporozoites in cell culture. J Parasitol 56:27-29
5. Hermosilla C, Barbisch B, Heise A, Kowalik S, Zahner H (2002) Development of Eimeria boris in vitro: suitability of several bovine, human and porcine endothelial cell lines, bovine fetal gastrointestinal, Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) and African green monkey kidney VERO) cells. Parasitol Res 88:301-307
6. Hofmann J, Raether W (1990) Improved techniques for the in vitro cultivation of Eimeria tenella in primary chick kidney cells. Parasitol Res 76:479-486
7. Itagaki K, Hirayama N, Tsubokura M, Otsuki K, Taira Y (1974) Devolopment of Eimeria tenella, E. brunetti and E. acervulina in cell cultures. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 36:467-482
8. Kogut MH, Lange C (1989) Interferon-gamma-mediated inhibition of the development of Eimeria tenella in cultured cells. J Parasitol 75:313-317
9. McDougald LR (1978) The growth of avian Eimeria in vitro In: Long PL, Boorman KN, Freeman BM (eds) Avian coccidiosis. British Poultry Science, Edinburgh, pp185-223
10. Patton WH (1965) Eimeria tenella: cultivation of the asexual stages in cultured animal cells. Science 150:767-769
11. Raether W, Hofmann J, Uphoff M (1995) In vitro cultivation of avian Eimeria species: Eimeria tenella. In: Eckert J, Braun R, Shirley MW, Coudert P (eds) Guidelines on techniques in coccidiosis research. European Commission, Luxembourg, pp 79-89
12. Schmatz DM, Crane MS, Murray PK (1984) Purification of Eimeria sporozoites by DE-52 anion exchange chromatography. J Protozool 31:181-183
13. 3H-uracil as a quantitative measure of intracellular development. J Protozool 33:109-114
14. Upton SJ, Tilley M, Brillhart DB (1994) Comparative development of Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa) in 11 continuous host cell lines. FEMS Microbiol Lett 118:233-236
15. Wang CC (1982) Biochemistry and physiology of Coccidia: In Long PL (ed) The biology of the coccidia. Arnold, London, pp 167-216
16. Zhang J, Wilson E, Yang S, Healey MC (1997) Adapting Eimeria tenella to grow in primary chicken kidney cells following repeated passages between cell culture and chickens. Avian Dis 41:111-116