ADR and the courts: An update

Duke Law Journal

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1445-

  Wald, Patricia M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041763272     PISSN: 00127086     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/1372993     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. These processes include arbitration, mediation, settlement conferences, early neutral evaluation, mini-trials, and summary jury trials.
2. See, e.g., James F. Henry, No Longer a Rarity, Judicial ADR is Preparing for Great Growth - But Much Care is Needed, 9 ALTERNATIVES TO THE HIGH COST OF LITIGATION 95, 96 (1991) (discussing the increased use of ADR).
3. See Cary Coglianese, Assessing Consensus: The Promise and Performance of Negotiated Rulemaking, 46 DUKE L.J. 1255 (1997).
4. Of the 3295 administrative appeals in federal courts of appeals in 1995, 617 were filed in the D.C. Circuit; the Ninth Circuit, with 921 appeals filed, was the only Circuit to surpass us. See ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS, JUDICIAL BUSINESS OF THE UNITED STATES COURTS 20 tbl.2, 87-90 tbl.B-1 (1995) [hereinafter JUDICIAL BUSINESS].