A descriptive study of early nonspecific chest pain after PTCA: Important area for the acute health care personnel

Heart and Lung: Journal of Acute and Critical Care

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 241-249

  Ronnevig, Marit ^a,b   Bjorsvik, Elisabeth ^a   Gullestad, Lars ^a   Forfang, Kolbjorn ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTILIPEMIC AGENT; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; NITRATE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; THORAX PAIN; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 0041743147     PISSN: 01479563     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0147-9563(03)00024-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Jeremias A, Kutscher S, Haude M, Heinen D, Holtmann G, Senf W, et al. Non ischemic chest pain induced by coronary interventions. Circulation 1998;98:265658.
2. Beattie S, Geden E. Reducing pain and discomfort following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 1990;9:150-5.
3. Kimble LP, King KB. Perceived side effects and benefits of coronary angioplasty in the early recovery period. Heart Lung 1998;27:308-14.
4. Mansour M, Carrozza JP, Kuntz RE, Fishman RF, Pomerantz RM, Senerchia CC, et al. Frequency and outcome of chest pain after two new coronary interventions (atherectomy and stenting). Am J Cardiol 1992;69(17);1379-82.
5. Sipperly ME. Expanding role of coronary angioplasty, current implications, limitations, and nursing considerations. Heart Lung 1989;18:507-13.
6. Jeremias A, Kutscher S, Haude M, Heinen D, Baumgart D, Hermann I, et al. Chest pain after coronary interventional procedures incidence and pathophysiology. Herz 1999;24(2):126-31.
7. Tomai F, Crea F, Gaspardone A, Versaci F, Esposito C, Chiariello L, et al. Mechanisms of cardiac pain during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1993;22(7):1892-6.
8. Versaci F, Gaspardone A, Tomai F, Proietti I, Crea F, Chiariello L, et al. Chest pain after coronary artery stent implantation. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:500-4.
9. Puntillo K, Tesler M. Pain. In: Carrieri-Kohlman V, Lindsey A, West C, eds. Patho-physiological Phenomena in Nursing Human responses to illness. USA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1993. p 303-39.
10. Melzack R, Katz J. Pain Measurement in persons in pain. In: Wall PD, Melzack R, eds. Textbook of pain. Tokyo: Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p 337-51.
11. O'Connor L. Pain assessment by patients and nurses, and nurses' notes on it, in early acute myocardial infarction. Part I. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1995;11(4):183-91.
12. O'Connor L. Pain assessment by patients and nurses, and nurses' notes on it, in early acute myocardial infarction. Part 2. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1995;11(5):283-92.
13. Neill KM. Ethnic pain styles in acute myocardial infarction. West J Nurs Res 1993;15(5):531-47.
14. Gaston-Johansson F, Hofgren C, Watson P, Herlitz J. Myocardial infarction pain, systematic description and analysis. Intensive Care Nurs 1991;7:2-10.
15. Hofgren C, Karlson B, Gaston-Johansson F, Herlitz J. Word descriptors in suspected acute myocardial infarction, a comparison between patients with and without confirmed myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 1994;23:397-403.
16. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire, major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277-99.
17. Kim HS, Schwartz-Barcott D, Holter IM, Lorensen M. Developing a translation of the McGill pain questionnaire for cross-cultural comparison, an example from Norway. J Adv Nurs 1995;21:421-6.
18. Strand LI, Ljunggren AE. Different approximation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in the Norwegian language, a discussion of content validity. J Adv Nurs 1997;26:772-9.