Real-world effectiveness of Ergonomic methods

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 465-477

  MacLeod, Iain S ^a  

^a New House Farm   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Ergonomics; Evaluation; Fitness; Knowledge; Lifecycle; Methods; Purpose; Systems

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; MANAGERS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

SYSTEM EFFECTIVENESS;

ERGONOMICS;

ARTICLE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ERGONOMICS; TECHNOLOGY; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE;

EID: 0041735385     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00066-8     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation. Rasmussen J., Duncan K., Leplat J. New Technology and Human Error. 1987;Wiley, New York.
2. Banister P., Burman E., Parker I., Taylor M., Tindall C. Qualitative Methods in Psychology. A Research Guide:1998;Open University Press, Buckingham, GB.
3. Beevis D., Slade I.M. Ergonomics - costs and benefits. Appl. Ergon. 1:1970;79-85.
4. Billings C.E. Aviation Automation. The Search for a Human-Centered Approach:1997;Laurence Erlbaum, Associates Inc., NJ.
5. EIA, 1994. Electrical Industries Association (EIA) Interim Standard, Systems Engineering, EIS/IS-632. EIA Publications Office, Washington DC.
6. Hendrick H.W. Measuring the economic benefits of ergonomics. Scott P.A., Bridger R.S., Chateris J. Global Ergonomics. 1998;851-854 Elsevier Press, Amsterdam.
7. Hollnagel E. What we do not know about man-machine systems. Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 18:1983;135-143.
8. Hollnagel E., Woods D.D. Cognitive systems engineering. new wine in new bottles Int. J. Man-Machine Stud. 18:1983;583-600.
9. Howard M. Visualising automation behaviour. Dekker S., Hollnagel E. Coping with Computers in the Cockpit. 1999;55-67 Ashgate, Hants, GB.
10. IEEE P1220, 1998. Standard for the Application and Management of the SE Process, IEEE Standards Department, Piscataway, NJ.
11. Langer E.J. Matters of mind. mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective Conscious. Cognition. 1:1992;289-305.
12. MacLeod, I.S., 1998. Information and advice: considerations on their forms and differences in future aircraft systems. In: Scott, P.A., Bridger, R.S., Charteris (Eds.), Global Ergonomics. Elsevier Science, Oxford, pp. 667-672.
13. MacLeod I.S. A case for the consideration of system related cognitive function throughout design and development. Syst. Eng. 3(3):2000;113-127.
14. MacLeod, I.S., 2001a. 'Reliable' Military aerospace system development and performance: influencing factors. In: Proceedings of Human Error and Safety in Systems Design (HESSD01), Linchoping, Sweden, July.
15. MacLeod, I.S., 2001b. Digital avionics mission systems: diversity versus fitness for purpose requirements. In: Proceedings of 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Daytona Beach, Florida.
16. MacLeod I.S., Taylor R.M., Davies C.L. Perspectives on the appreciation of team situational awareness. Garland D.J., Endsley M.R. Experimental Analysis and Measurement of Situation Awareness. 1995;305-312 Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Press, FL.
17. MacLeod, I.S., Wells, L., Lane. K., 2000. The Practice of Triangulation, Contemporary Ergonomics 2000. Taylor & Francis, London.
18. Miles, J.L., 1993. TASK Analysis - Foundation for Modern Technology presented at MRC Workshop on Task Analysis, University of Warwick, UK.
19. Nielson J. Usability Engineering. 1993;Bellcore, New Jersey.
20. Norman D.A. The design of everyday things. 1990;Basic Books, New York.
21. Richardson, T.E. (Ed.), 1996. Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences, BPS Books, The British Psychological Society, Leicester, UK.
22. Society of Automotive Engineers ARP 4754, 1995. Certification Considerations for Highly-Integrated or Complex Aircraft Systems.
23. Standish Group 1998. Chaos, http://standishgroup.com/visitor/chaos.htm .
24. UKDS, 1996. UK Defence Standard 00-56/2, Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems, Part 1: Requirements and Part 2: Guidance, dated 13th December 1996.
25. UKDS, 1997. UK Defence Standard 00-55/2, The Requirements for Safety Related Software in Defence Equipment, Part 1: Requirements and Part 2: Guidance, dated 1st August 1997.
26. Wiener E.L. Beyond the sterile cockpit. Hum. Factors. 27(1):1985;87.