National survey of bile duct injury associated with cholecystectomy big brother in the operating room versus another EBM tool for critical assessment of surgical innovation?

Acta Chirurgica Belgica

Volumn 103, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 181-186

  Michel, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF MONT GODINNE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILE DUCT INJURY; BILIARY TRACT SURGERY; BIOAVAILABILITY; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPY; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OPERATING ROOM; PATIENT CARE; VALIDATION PROCESS; BELGIUM; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EXPERIMENTAL THERAPY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEPATIC DUCT; INJURY; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SURGERY;

BELGIUM; BILE DUCTS, EXTRAHEPATIC; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE RATIONING; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SURGERY; THERAPIES, INVESTIGATIONAL;

EID: 0041735312     PISSN: 00015458     EISSN: 25770160     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2003.11679404     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. RHODES R. S., RHODES P. Cost-effectiveness analysis in surgery : who will use it and how ? Surgery, 1998, 123 : 119-20.
2. BODENHEIMER T., CASALINO L. Executives with white coats - the work and world view of managed-care medical directors (second of two parts). New Engl J Med, 1999, 341 : 2029-32.
3. SACKETT D. L., ROSENBERG W. M. C., GRAY J. A. M., HAYNES R. B., RICHARSON W. S. Evidence based medicine : what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 1996, 312 : 71-72.
4. MICHEL L. Equité, études «coût- efficacité» et evidence based medicine : une illustration en chirurgie. Ethica Clinica, 2000, 20 : 14-23.
5. MICHEL L. Evidence Based Medicine, Cost-Containement, Care Effectiveness. Acta Chir, 2001, 1001 : 95-100.
6. AIRAN M., APPEL G. B., COBURG A. J. et al. Retrospective and prospective multi-institutional laparoscopic cholecystectomy study organized by the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surgical Endoscopy, 1992, 6 : 169-76.
7. MICHEL L., JOHNSON P. Is surgical mystique a myth and double standard the reality ? J Med Ethics - Medical Humanities, 2002, 28 : 66-70.
8. Steiner C. A., Bass E. B., Talami M. A. et al. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. New Engl J Med, 1994, 330 : 403-8.
9. MCKNEALLY M. F. Ethical problems in surgery : innovation leading to unforeseen complications. World J Surg, 1998, 23 : 786-8.
10. MICHEL L. Expériences chirurgicales et innovations médicales. Le Soir 2001 Feb 2 : 14.
11. MICHEL L., JOHNSON P. Is surgical mystique a myth and double standard the reality ? op. cit.
12. CULPEPPER L., GILBERT T. T. Evidence and ethics. Lancet, 1999, 353 : 829-31.
13. MICHEL L., JAMART J., BRADPIECE H. et al. Prediction of risk in non-cardiac surgery following cardiac surgery. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg, 1990, 100 : 595-605.
14. KASSIRER J. P., ANGELL M. Risk adjustment or risk avoidance ? New Engl J Med, 1998, 339 : 1925-6.
15. GREENHALGH T. How to read a paper ? The basics of evidence base medicine. BMJ Books, 2001 : 136.
16. SHEKELLE P. G., KAHAN J. P., BERNSTEIN S. J., LEAPE L. L., KAMBERG C. J., PARK R. E. The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures. New Engl J Med, 1998, 338 : 1888-95.
17. SACKETT D. L. The sins of expertness and a proposal for redemption. BMJ, 2000, 320 : 1283.