Effects of postconditioning inflation on odor + taste compound conditioning

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 173-184

  Batsell Jr , W Robert ^a   Trost, Christina A ^a   Cochran, Stephanie R ^a   Blankenship, Aaron G ^a   Batson, John D ^b  

^a KALAMAZOO COLLEGE   (United States)

^b FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; AVERSION; CONDITIONING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLAVOR; MALE; NONHUMAN; ODOR AVERSION; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; RAT; TASTE AVERSION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR; CONDITIONED REFLEX; LEARNING; ODOR; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TASTE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; AVOIDANCE LEARNING; CONDITIONING, CLASSICAL; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; MALE; ODORS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TASTE;

EID: 0041734908     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03195980     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. BATSELL, W. R., JR., & BATSON, J. D. (1999). Augmentation of taste conditioning by a preconditioned odor. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 25, 374-388.
2. BATSELL, W. R., JR., & BEST, M. R. (1993). One bottle too many? Method of testing determines the detection of overshadowing and retention of taste aversions. Animal Learning & Behavior, 21, 154-158.
3. BATSELL, W. R., JR., PASCHALL, G. Y., GLEASON, D. I., & BATSON, J. D. (2001). Taste preconditioning augments odor-aversion learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 30-47.
4. BATSON, J. D., & BATSELL, W. R., JR. (2000). Augmentation, not blocking, in an A+/AX+ flavor-conditioning procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 466-471.
5. BATSON, J. D., & BATSELL, W. R., JR. (2001, March). Order of conditioning sequences determines potentiation. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Meeting, The International Conference of Comparative Cognition, Melbourne, FL.
6. BEST, M. R., & DOMJAN, M. (1979). Characteristics of the lithium-mediated proximal US-preexposure effect in flavor-aversion conditioning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 7, 433-440.
7. BOUTON, M. E., JONES, D. L., MCPHILLIPS, S. A., & SWARTZENTRUBER, D. (1986). Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: Role of method of odor presentation, the distal-proximal cue distinction, and the conditionability of odor. Learning & Motivation, 17, 115-138.
8. DOMJAN, M., & BEST, M. R. (1977). Paradoxical effects of proximal unconditioned stimulus preexposure: Interference with and conditioning of a taste aversion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 310-321.
9. DURLACH, P. J., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1980). Potentiation rather than overshadowing in flavor-aversion learning: An analysis in terms of within-compound associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 6, 175-187.
10. GARCIA, J., LASITER, P. S., BERMUDEZ-RATTONI, F., & DEEMS, D. A. (1985). A general theory of aversion learning. In N. S. Braveman & P. Bronstein (Eds.), Experimental assessments and clinical applications of conditioned food aversions (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 443, pp. 8-21). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
11. HOLLAND, P. C. (1981). Acquisition of representation-mediated conditioned food aversions. Learning & Motivation, 12, 1-18.
12. LETT, B. T. (1984). Extinction of taste aversion does not eliminate taste potentiation of odor aversion in rats or color aversion in pigeons. Animal Learning & Behavior, 12, 414-420.
13. LOLORDO, V. M., & DROUNGAS, A. (1989). Selective associations and adaptive specializations: Taste aversions and phobias. In S. B. Klein & R. Mowrer (Eds.), Contemporary learning theories: Instrumental conditioning theory and the impact of biological constraints on learning (pp. 145-179). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. MACKINTOSH, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 186-192.
15. PAVLOV, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
16. PEARCE, J. M., & HALL, G. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. Psychological Review, 87, 532-552.
17. RESCORLA, R. A., & WAGNER, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
18. RUSINIAK, K. W., HANKINS, W. G., GARCIA, J., & BRETT, L. P. (1979). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste in rats. Behavioral & Neural Biology, 25, 1-17.
19. SLOTNICK, B. M., WESTBROOK, F., & DARLING, F. M. C. (1997). What the rat's nose tells the rat's mouth: Long delay aversion conditioning with aqueous odors and potentiation of taste by odors. Animal Learning & Behavior, 25, 357-369.
20. WESTBROOK, R. F., HOMEWOOD, J., HORN, K., & CLARKE, J. C. (1983). Flavour-odour compound conditioning: Odour-potentiation and flavour-attenuation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35B, 13-33.