Effective size in simple metapopulation models

Heredity

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 107-111

  Rousset, F ^a  

^a INSTITUT DES SCIENCES DE L EVOLUTION   (France)

Author keywords

Coalescence; Effective size; Metapopulation

Indexed keywords

EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION MODELING;

ALGORITHMS; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 0041731996     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800286     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Caswell H (2001). Matrix Population Models. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA.
2. Charlesworth B (1994). Evolution in Age-structured Populations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
3. Ewens WJ (1982). On the concept of the effective population size. Theor Popul Biol 21: 373-378.
4. Hill WG (1972). Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. Theor Popul Biol 3: 278-289.
5. Horn RA, Johnson CR (1985) Matrix Analysis. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
6. Hudson RR (1998). Island models and the coalescent process. Mol Ecol 7: 413-418.
7. Ingvarsson PK, Olsson K, Ericson L (1997). Extinction-recolonization dynamics in the mycophagous beetle Phalarus substriatus. Evolution 51: 187-195.
8. Nagylaki T (1983). The robustness of neutral models of geographical variation. Theor Popul Biol 24: 268-294.
9. Nordborg M (2001). Coalescent theory. In: Balding DJ, Bishop M, Cannings C (eds.) Handbook of Statistical Genetics, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, UK. pp 179-212.
10. Nordborg M, Krone SM (2002). Separation of time scales and convergence to the coalescent in structured populations. In: Slatkin M, Veuille M (eds.) Modern developments in Theoretical Population Genetics, Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp 194-232.
11. Pannell JR, Charlesworth B (1999). Neutral genetic diversity in a metapopulation with recurrent local extinction and recolonization. Evolution 53: 664-676.
12. Rousset F (2002). Inbreeding and relatedness coefficients: what do they measure? Heredity 88: 371-380.
13. Rousset F (in press). Genetic Structure and Selection in Subdivided Populations. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ
14. Slatkin M (1977) Gene flow and genetic drift in a species subject to frequent local extinctions. Theor Popul Biol 12: 253-262.
15. Wade M, McCauley D (1988). Extinction and recolonization: their effects on the genetic differentiation of local populations. Evolution 42: 995-1005.
16. Wakeley J, Aliacar N (2001). Gene genealogies in a metapopulation. Genetics 159: 893-905.
17. Whitlock MC (1992). Nonequilibrium population structure in forked fungus beetles: extinction, colonization, and the genetic variance among populations. Am Nat 139: 952-970.
18. Whitlock MC, Barton NH (1997). The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics 146: 427-441.
19. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1990). Some population genetic consequences of colony formation and extinction: genetic correlations within founding groups. Evolution 44: 1717-1724.
20. Whitlock MC, Phillips PC, Wade MJ (1993). Gene interaction affects the additive genetic variance in subdivided populations with migration and extinction. Evolution 47: 1758-1769.
21. Wolfram S (1999). The Mathematica Book, 4th edn. Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
22. Wright S (1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28: 114-138.