Group Psychotherapy Research: Current Status and Future Trends on the Dawn of the New Millennium

Group

Volumn 24, Issue 2-3, 2000, Pages 157-165

  Greene, Les R ^a  

^a VA CONNECTICUT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical outcome; Effectiveness studies; Efficacy; Future trends; Group psychotherapy; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041726466     PISSN: 03624021     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007579815209     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Addis, M., Wade, W., & Hatgis, C. (1999). Barriers to dissemination of evidence-based practices: Addressing practitioners' concerns about manual based psychotherapies. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 430-441.
2. Bergin, A. (1997). Neglect of the therapist and the human dimensions of change: A commentary. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 83-89.
3. Burlingame, G., Fuhriman, A., & Anderson, E. (1995, August). Group psychotherapy efficacy: A meta-analytic perspective. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, NY.
4. Donenberg, G., Lyons, J., & Howard, K. (1999). Clinical trials versus mental health services research: Contributions and connections. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1135-1146.
5. Goldfried, M., Borkovec, T., Clarkin, J., Johnson, L., & Parry, G. (1999). Toward the development of a clinically useful approach to psychotherapy research. Journal of Clinical Psychology/In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 55, 1385-1405.
6. Greene, L. R. (2000). Process analysis of group interaction in therapeutic groups. In A. P. Beck & C. M. Lewis (Eds.), The process of group psychotherapy: Systems for analyzing change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7. Grotstein, J. (1999). The fate of the unconscious in future psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 53, 52-59.
8. Klein, D., & Smith, L. (1999). Organizational requirements of effective clinical effectiveness studies, Prevention and Treatment, 2, Article 0002a. Available on the World Wide Web: http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume2/pre0020002a.html.
9. Krause, M., & Howard, K. (1999). "Between group psychotherapy outcome research and basic science" revisited. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 159-169.
10. Luborsky, L., Diguer, L., Seligman, D., Rosenthal, R., Krause, E., Johnson, S., Halperin, G., Bishop, M., Berman, J., & Schweizer, E. (1999). The researcher's own therapy allegiances: A "wild card" in comparisons of treatment efficacy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 95-106.
11. Mahrer, A. (1999). Embarrassing problems for the field of psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1147-1156.
12. Marcus, D., & Holahan, W. (1994). Interpersonal perception in group therapy: A social relations analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 776-782.
13. Marcus, D., & Kashy, D. (1995). The social relations model: A tool for group psychotherapy research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 383-389.
14. McRoberts, C., Burlingame, G., & Hoag, M. (1998). Comparative efficacy of individual and group psychotherapy: A meta-analytic perspective. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 101-117.
15. Miklowitz, D., & Clarkin, J. (1999). Balancing internal and external validity. Prevention and Treatment, 2, Article 0004c. Available on the World Wide Web: http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume2/pre0020004c.html.
16. National Advisory Mental Health Council's Clinical Treatment and Services research workgroup. (1999). Bridging science and service. Available on the World Wide Web: http://www. nimh.nih.gov/research/bridge.htm.
17. Newman, M., & Castonguay, L. (1999) Reflecting on current challenges and future directions in psychotherapy: What can be learned from dialogues between clinicians, researchers, and policy makers? Journal of Clinical Psychology/In Session: Psychotherapy in Practice, 55, 1407-1413.
18. Niederehe, G., Street, L., & Lebowitz, B. (1999). NIMH support for psychotherapy research: Opportunities and questions, Prevention & Treatment, 2, Article 0003a. Available on the World Wide Web: http://journals.apa.org/prevention/volume2/pre0020003a.html.
19. Norquist, G., Lebowitz, B., & Hyman, S. (1999). Expanding the frontier of treatment research. Prevention & Treatment, 2, Article 0001a. Available on the World Wide Web: http://journals. apa.org/prevention/volume2/pre0020001a.html.
20. Parloff, M. (1998). Is psychotherapy more than manual labor? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 376-381.
21. Powdermaker, F. B., & Frank, J. D. (1953). Group psychotherapy: Studies in methodology of research and therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Sexton, H. (1993). Exploring a psychotherapeutic change sequence: Relating process to intersessional and posttreatment outcome. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 128-136.
23. Smith, D. L. (1999). Getting our act together: Lessons on meaningful psychotherapy research from the philosophy of science. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55, 1495-1505.
24. Speigel, D., Bloom, J., & Yalom, I. (1981). Group support for metastatic cancer patients: A randomized outcome study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 38, 527-553.
25. Spira, J. (Ed.) (1997). Group Therapy for Medically Ill Patients. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Strupp, H., & Anderson, T. (1997). On the limitations of therapy manuals. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 4, 76-82.