The independent localisations of interaction and learning in the repeated prisoner's dilemma

Theory and Decision

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 57-72

  Hoffmann, Robert ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Genetic algorithm; Localisation; Repeated prisoner's dilemma

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041713870     PISSN: 00405833     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005008122139     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.
2. Axelrod, R. (1987), The evolution of strategies in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, in L. Davis (ed.), Genetic Algorithms and Simulating Annealing, Pitman, London, UK, pp. 32-41.
3. Binmore, K. and Samuelson, L. (1992), Evolutionary stability in games played by finite automata, Journal of Economic Theory 57: 278-305.
4. Ellison, G. (1993), Learning, local interaction, and coordination, Econometrica 61(5): 1047-1071.
5. Fogel, D. (1993), Evolving behaviors in the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma, Evolutionary Computation 1: 77-97.
6. Goldberg, D. (1989), Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
7. Hirshleifer, J. and Martinez Coll, J. (1988), What strategies can support the evolutionary emergence of cooperation?, Journal of Conflict Resolution 32: 367-398.
8. Hoffmann, R. (1997), The ecology of cooperation, mimeo.
9. Holland, J. (1992a), Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Holland, J. (1992b), Genetic algorithms, Scientific American, July 1992: 44-50.
11. Holland, J. and Miller, J. (1991), Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory, AEA Papers and Proceedings, pp. 365-370.
12. Kapsalis, A., Smith, G. and Rayward-Smith, V. (1994), A unified paradigm for parallel genetic algorithms, in: T. Fogarty (ed.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin, Springer Verlag, pp. 131-149.
13. Kirchkamp, O. (1995), Spatial evolution of automata in the Prisoner's Dilemma, mimeo.
14. Lindgren, K. (1992), Evolutionary phenomena in simple dynamics, in: C. Langten (ed.), Artificial Life II, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
15. Linster, B. (1992), Evolutionary stability in the infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma played by two-state Moore machines, Southern Economic Journal 58: 880-903.
16. Marks, R. (1989), Breeding hybrid strategies: optimal behavior for oligopolists, in: J. Schaffer (ed.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, pp. 198-207.
17. Marks, R. (1992), Repeated games and finite automata, in: J. Creedy, J. Barland and J. Eichberger (eds.), Recent Developments in Game Theory, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
18. Miller, J. (1996), The coevolution of automata in the repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 29: 87-112.
19. Mueller, U. (1988), Optimal retaliation for optimal cooperation, Journal of Conflict Resolution 31: 692-724.
20. Nachbar, J. (1992), Evolution in the finitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 19: 307-326.
21. Nowak, M. and May, R. (1992a), Evolutionary games and spatial chaos, Nature 359: 826-829.
22. Nowak, M. and May, R. (1992b), The Spatial dilemmas of evolution, International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos 3(1): 35-78.
23. Oliphant, M. (1994), Evolving cooperation inthe non-iterated Prisoner's Dilemma: the importance of spatial organisation, Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
24. Routledge, B. (1993), Co-evolution and spatial interaction, mimeo.