False negative Pap smears in a Danish material;Falsk negative cervixcytologiske Prøver i et Dansk materiale

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 165, Issue 23, 2003, Pages 2391-2394

  Ejersbo, Dorthe ^b   Dahl, Maj Britt ^b   Hølund, Berit ^a  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CANCER CYTODIAGNOSIS; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; DENMARK; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STAFF; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; QUALITY CONTROL; SAMPLE; SAMPLING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNIQUE; TRAINING; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA; ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA IN SITU; MASS SCREENING; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCER; STANDARD; UTERINE CERVIX; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADENOCARCINOMA; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CERVIX UTERI; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; UTERINE CERVICAL DYSPLASIA; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0041706616     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Olsen J, Screening. Ugeskr Læger 2002;164:148-52.
2. Jensen ML, Hariri J, Nielsen K et al. Anbefalede retningslinjer for danske patologiafdelinger vedrørende kvalitetssikring af screening mod livmoderhalskræft. København: Dansk Selskab for Patologisk Anatomi og Cytologi, 2000.
3. Beilby JOW, Bourne R, Guillebaud J et al. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening. Obstet Gynecol 1982;60:46-8.
4. Bartoo GT, Lee JSJ, Bartels PH et al. Automated prescreening of conventional prepared cervical smears: a feasibility study. Lab Invest 1992;66: 116-22.
5. Bosch MMC, Rietveld-Scheffer PEM, Boon M. Characteristics of false-negative smears tested in normal screening situation. Acta Cytol 1992;36: 711-6.
6. Renshaw AA. Déjà vu in pap testing: return of the 5% false negative fraction and the zero-error rate. Diagn Cytopathology 2002;266:343-4.
7. O'Sullivan JP. Observer variation in gynaecological cytopathology. Cytopathology 1998;9:6-14.
8. Hølund B, Grindsted P, Poulsen EF. Screening mod livmoderhalskræft i Fyns Amt. Månedsskr Prakt Lægegern 2000;78:256-62.
9. Nielsen MN, Hølund B, Nielsen B et al. Cytologisk atypi i cervix uteri - konsekvens? Ugeskr Læger 1996;158:2985-6.
10. Jensen ML, Fuursted PB, Svanholm H. Sammenligning af monolagsprø ver og konventionelle »smear«. Ugeskr Læger 2001;163:1270-5.
11. Bos AB, Ballegooijen M, van Oortmarssen G et al. Non-progression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia estimated from population screening data. Br J Cancer 1997;75:124-30.
12. Nanda K, McCrocy DC, Myers ER et al. Accuracy of the papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytological abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000;132:810-9.
13. Ronco G, Montanari G, Aimone V et al. Estimating the sensitivity of cervical cytology: errors of interpretation and test limitations. Cytopathology 1996; 7:151-8.
14. Michell H, Medley G. Differences between papanicoloau smears with correct and incorrect diagnoses. Cytopathology 1995;6:368-75.
15. DeMay RM. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1997;121:229-38.
16. DeMay RM. Cytopathology of false negatives preceding cervical carcinoma. AM J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175;4,part 2:1110-3.
17. Dudding N, Williams D. False negative smears. SCAN 2000;1:12-6.
18. Jensen ML, Fuursted PB, Svanholm H. Partiel rescreening af alle negative »smears«. Ugeskr Læger 2000;162:3024-7.
19. Dahl M-B, Ejersbo D, Hølund B. Årsag til og opfølgning af uegnede cervixcytologiske prøver i Fyns Amt. Ugeskr Læger 2002;164:4280-3.
20. Monsonego J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C et al. Liquid based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study. Br J Cancer 2001;84:360-6.