Vampire cyborgs scientific imperialism: A reading of the science-mysticism polemic in blade

Journal of Popular Film and Television

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 4-15

  Jordan, John J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041697650     PISSN: 01956051     EISSN: 19306458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01956059909602799     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ballif, M. “Writing the Third-Sophistic Cyborg: Periphrasis on an [In]Tense Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 28 (1998): 51-72.
2. Balsamo, A. Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women. Durham, NC: Duke UP, 1997.
3. Box Office.” Entertainment Weekly 4 September 1998: 59.
4. Brummett, B. Rhetorical Dimensions of Popular Culture. Tuscaloosa, AL: U of Alabama Press, 1991.
5. ‘The Charts.” Entertainment Weekly 15 January 1999: 67.
6. Eliade, M. The Sacred and the Profane: The Nature of Religion. Trans. W. Trask. San Diego, CA: Harvest Books, 1959.
7. Foucault, M. The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage, 1978.
8. Frye, N. Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1957.
9. Gelder, K. Reading the Vampire. New York: Routledge, 1994.
10. Gieryn, T. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (1983): 781-95.
11. Goodnight, G. T. “The Firm, the Park and the University: Fear and Trembling on the Postmodern Trail.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81 (1995): 267-90.
12. Goyer, D. Blade: The Screenplay. New York: New Line Productions, 1997.
13. Gross, A. The Rhetoric of Science. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1996.
14. Haraway, D. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.
15. Hariman, R. “Status, Marginality, and Rhetorical Theory.” Contemporary Rhetorical Theory. Ed. J. L. Lucaites, C. M. Condit, and S. Caudill. New York: Guilford, 1999.
16. Joyrich, L. Re-Viewing Reception: Television, Gender, and Postmodern Culture. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP, 1996.
17. Kunzru, H. “You Are Cyborg.” Wired February 1997: 155-59, 209-10.
18. Lessl, T. “Science and the Sacred Cosmos: The Ideological Rhetoric of Carl Sagan.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 71 (1985): 175-87.
19. Lessl, T. “The Priestly Voice.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 75 (1989): 183-97.
20. Menser, M., and S. Aronowitz. “On Cultural Studies, Science, and Technology.” Technoscience and Cyberculture. Ed. S. Aronowitz, B. Martinsons, and M. Menser. New York: Routledge, 1996.
21. Otto, R. The Idea of the Holy. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1923.
22. Prelli, L. A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse. Columbia, SC: U of South Carolina P, 1989.
23. Prelli, L. “Rhetorical Logic and the Integration of Rhetoric and Science.” Communication Monographs 57 (1990): 315-22.
24. Rushing, J. R., and T. S. Frentz. “The Frankenstein Myth in Contemporary Cinema.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 6 (1989): 61-80.
25. Taylor, C. A. “Defining the Scientific Community: A Rhetorical Perspective on Demarcation.” Communication Monographs 58 (1991): 402-20.
26. Thorburn, D. “Television Melodrama.” Television: The Critical View. Ed. H. Newcomb. 5th ed. New York: Oxford UP, 1994.
27. Tyndall, J. Fragments of Science, Part II. New York: P. F. Collier, 1905.
28. Wander, P. “The Rhetoric of Science.” Western Speech Communication 40 (1976): 226-35.
29. Williams, D. “2001: A Space Odyssey: A Warning Before Its Time.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1 (1984): 311-22.
30. Williams, P., and Chrisman, L. Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader. New York: Columbia UP, 1994.