Effect of ramped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite

Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 328-339

  Bouschlicher, Murray R ^a   Rueggeberg, Frederick A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALL BOND 2; ALL-BOND 2; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PERTAC HYBRID; POLYMER; RESIN; STEEL;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; HUMAN; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOMETRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; HUMANS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYMERS; RADIOMETRY; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; STEEL; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0041696389     PISSN: 14964155     EISSN: 17088240     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00242.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JWJ, Davis HC. A predictive model for the polymerization of photo-activated resin composites. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7:159–166.
2. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int 1986; 17:103–111.
3. Soltesz U, Benkeser G. Fatigue behaviour of filling materials. In: Kawahara H, ed. Oral implantology and biomaterials. The Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1989:281–286.
4. Sidhu SK, Henderson LJ. Dentin adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites. Am J Dent 1992; 5:240–243.
5. Bowen RL, Rapson JE, Dickson G. Hardening shrinkage and hygroscopic expansion of composite resins. J Dent Res 1982; 61:654–658.
6. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991; 10:107–113.
7. Kanca J, Suh BI. Pulse activation: reducing resin-based composite contraction stresses at the enamel cavosurface margins. Am J Dent 1999; 12:107–112.
8. Uno S, Asmussen E. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. Scand J Dent Res 1991; 99:440–444.
9. Unterbrink G, Muessner R. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent 1995; 23:183–189.
10. Bouschlicher MR, Vargas MA, Boyer DB. Effect of composite type, light intensity, configuration factor, and laser polymerization on polymerization contraction forces. Am J Dent 1997; 10:279–283.
11. Feilzer AJ, Dooren LH, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci 1995; 103:322–326.
12. Goracci G, Mori G, De’Martinis LC. Curing light intensity and marginal leakage of resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 1996; 27:355–362.
13. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without ‘softstart-polymerization. J Dent 1997; 25:321–330.
14. Burgess JO, de Goes M, Walker R, Ripps AH. An evaluation of four light-curing units comparing soft and hard curing. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1999; 11:125–132.
15. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636–1639.
16. Dlugokinski MD, Caughman WF, Rueggeberg FA. Assessing the effect of extraneous light on photoactivated resin composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129:1103–1109.
17. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Chan DCN. Novel approach to measure composite conversion kinetics during exposure with stepped or continuous light-curing. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11:197–205.
18. Rueggeberg FA, Hashinger DT, Fairhurst CW. Calibration of FTIR conversion analysis of contemporary dental resin composites. Dent Mater 1990; 6:241–249.
19. Billmeyer F Jr. Textbook of polymer science. 3rd Ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1984:49–58.
20. Decker C, Decker D, Morel F. Light intensity and temperature effect in photo-initiated polymerization. In: Scranton AB, Bowman CN, Peiffer RW, eds. Photo-polymerization: fundamentals and applications. Vol. 673. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1997:63–80.
21. Mehl A, Manhart J, Kremers L, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. Physical properties and marginal quality of Class II composite fillings after softstart polymerization. J Dent Res 1996; 76:279. (Abstr).
22. Bouschlicher MR, Rueggeberg FA, Boyer DB. Effect of stepped light intensity on polymerization force and conversion in a photoactivated composite. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12:23–32.
23. Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller K, Markl A. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without “softstart-polymerization. Oper Dent 1999; 25:26–32.
24. Asmussen E. Composite restorative resins: composition versus wall-to-wall polymerization contraction. Acta Odontol Scand 1975; 33:337–343.
25. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Assessing the effect of composite formulation on polymerization stress. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:497–503.
26. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Reduction of composite contraction stress through non-bonded microfiller particles. Dent Mater 1998; 14:256–260.
27. Aarnts MP, Akinmade A, Feilzer AJ. Effect of filler load on contraction stress and volumetric shrinkage. J Dent Res 1999; 78:482. (Abstr).
28. Sakaguchi RL, Ferracane JL. Stress transfer from polymerization shrinkage of a chemical-cured composite bonded to a pre-cast composite substrate. Dent Mater 1998; 14:106–111.
29. Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL. Thermal expansion coefficient of dental composites measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater 1996; 12:290–294.
30. Aarnts MP, Akinmade A, Feilzer AJ. Effects of photoinitiator concentration on conversion, strength, and stress development. J Dent Res 1999; 78:234. (Abstr).