Faculty and administrative support for institutional effectiveness activities: A bridge across the chasm?

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 74, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 445-468

  Welsh, John F ^a   Metcalf, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041657818     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2003.11780856     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Abraham-Ramirez, H. D. (1997). Sources of influence on faculty members' receptivity to continuous quality improvement initiatives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
2. Banta, T. W. (1993). Making a difference: Outcomes of a decade of assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Banta, T. W., Lund, J. P., Black, K., & Oblander, F. (Eds.). (1996) Assessment in practice: Putting principles to work on college campuses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Benjamin, E. (1994). From accreditation to regulation: The decline of academic autonomy in higher education. Academe, 80 (4), 34-36.
5. Birnbaum, R. (1989). How colleges work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Birnbaum, R. (2000) Management fads in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7. Bogue, G. B., & Saunders, R. L. (1992). The evidence for quality: Strengthening the tests of academic administrative effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Bok, D. (1986). Higher learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Bonvillian, G., & Dennis, T. L. (1995). Total quality management in higher education: Opportunities and obstacles. In S. J. Sims & R. R. Sims (Eds.), Total quality management in higher education: Is it working? Why or why not? (pp. 37-50). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
10. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
11. Bryan, W. A. (1996). What is total quality management? New Directions for Student Services, 76, 3-15.
12. Burgher, R. L. (1998). The perceptions of support for innovation in mid-western liberal arts colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
13. Campbell, T. I. D., & Slaughter, S. (1999). Faculty and administrators' attitudes toward potential conflicts of interest, commitment, and equity in university-industry relationships. The Journal of Higher Education, 70, 309-352.
14. Chaffee, E,. & Sherr, L. (1992). Quality: Transforming postsecondary education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Number 3. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 351 922)
15. Chambliss, C. (1994). Reigniting the flame: TQM tactics for faculty rejuvenation. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 368 276)
16. Clarke, J. S. (1997). Personal and organizational structure correlates of receptivity and resistance to change and effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA.
17. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Engelkemeyer, S. W. (1995). Engaging faculty in continuous improvement and change initiatives. In S. J. Sims & R. R. Sims (Eds.), Total quality management in higher education: Is it working? Why or why not? (pp. 141-159). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
19. Ewell, P. T. (1989). Institutional characteristics and faculty/administrator Perceptions of outcomes: An exploratory analysis. Research in Higher Education, 30(2), 13-36.
20. Ewell, P. T. (1990). Assessment and the "new accountability": A challenge for higher education's leadership. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
21. Ewell, P. T. (1991). Effectiveness and student success in community colleges: Practices, realities, and imperatives. Paper presented at the Accountability and Assessment for the Community College System conference, Raleigh, NC., November, 1991.
22. Ewell, P. T. (1998). Examining a brave new world: How accreditation might be different. Paper presented at the meeting of the Council on Higher Education Accreditation's conference on Enhancing Usefulness of Accreditation in a Changing Environment, Washington, DC., May 1998.
23. Frielander, J., & MacDougall, P. R. (1990). Responding to mandates for institutional effectiveness. New Directions for Community Colleges, 72(4), 93-100.
24. Gray, P. J., & Banta, T. W. (Eds.). (1997). The campus-level impact of assessment: Progress, problems, and possibilities. New Directions for Higher Education, No. 100. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
25. Klein, A., & Dunlap, W. P. (1994). Change: Faculty/administration perspectives. College Student Journal, 28, 199-204.
26. Lewis, R. G., & Smith, D. K. (1994). Total quality in higher education. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press.
27. Lucas, C. J. (1996). Crisis in the academy. New York: St. Martin's Press.
28. McClure, T. R., Jr. (1996). A study of the impact of externally mandated institutional effectiveness and assessment activities on South Carolina technical colleges as perceived by technical college personnel in leadership roles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.
29. McConnell, T. R. (1992). Accountability and autonomy. Journal of Higher Education, 42, 445-451.
30. Moran, E. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (1988). Examining organizational climate in institutions of higher education. Research in Higher Education, 28, 367-382.
31. Morse, J. A., & Santiago, G., Jr. (2000). Accreditation and faculty: Working together. Academe, 86(1), 30-34.
32. Nichols, J. O. (1995). A practitioner's handbook for institutional effectiveness and student outcomes assessment implementation. New York: Agathon.
33. Ohmann, R. (2000, January-February). Historical reflections on accountability. Academe, 86, 24-29.
34. Palomba, M., & Banta, T. (1999). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing and improving assessment in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35. Pew Higher Education Research Group (1996). Shared Purposes. (1996). Policy Perspectives, 6(4), 1-8.
36. Rawls, J. L. (1998). Faculty-administrative conflict: Bridging the gap for collaborative leadership in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
37. Richardson, R. C., Jr. (1988). Improving effectiveness through strategic planning. Community College Review, 15(4), 28-34.
38. Ryan, J. G. (1993). After accreditation: How to institutionalize outcomes-based assessment. New Directions for Community Colleges, 83(3), 75-81.
39. Schilling, K. M., & Schilling, K. L. (1998). Proclaiming and sustaining excellence: Assessment as a faculty role. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 26(3) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 420 245). Washington, DC: The George Washington University, Graduate School of Education and Human Development.
40. Seymour, D. (1993). On Q, causing quality in higher education. New York: ACE MacMillian.
41. Sims, S. J., & Sims, R. R. (1995). Toward an understanding of total quality management: Its relevance and contribution to higher education. In S. J. Sims & R. R. Sims (Eds.), Total quality management in higher education: Is it working? Why or why not? (pp. 1-22). Westport, CT: Praeger.
42. Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges. (1998). 1998 criteria for accreditation. Decatur, GA: Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges.
43. Thomas, J. P. (1997). Innovation conditions and processes used in the adoption of institutional effectiveness in two-year colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools accreditation region. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
44. Volkwein, J. F., & Malik, S. M. (1997). State regulation and administrative flexibility at public universities. Research in Higher Education: Journal of the Association of Institutional Research, 38(1), pp. 17-42.