IMPLEMENTING ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANTS

Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 1999

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 405-410

  Caglio, Ariela ^a   Newman, Michael ^b  

^a BOCCONI UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTERPRISE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; DIFFERENT CLASS; ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING SYSTEMS; INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEM; NEW ENTERPRISE; ORGANIZATIONAL ACTIVITIES; PROCESS-VIEW; STRUCTURATION; STRUCTURATION THEORY; SYSTEM IMPACT;

RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

EID: 0041654209     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Barley, S. “Technology as an Occasion for Structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments,” Administrative Science Quartrerly (31), 1986.
2. Barley, S., and Tolbert P. “Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution,” Organization Studies (18:1), 1997.
3. Burns, J., and Baldvinsdottir G. “Hybrid Accountants: Where Do They Belong and What (Are They Expected To) Do?” paper presented at the Conference on Management Accounting Change—A European Perspective, Manchester, England, April 1999.
4. Burns, J., and Scapens W. R. “Conceptualizing Management Accounting Change: An Institutional Framework,” School of Accounting and Finance, Manchester University, 1999.
5. Cooper, R. “Look Out, Management Accountants,” Management Accounting, May/June, 1996.
6. Davenport, T. H. “Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise System,” Harvard Business Review, July-August, 1998.
7. Edmunds, G.; Baker, S.; and Cortese, A. “Silicon Valley on the Rhine,” BusinessWeek, November 3, 1997.
8. Giddens, A. Central Problems in Social Theory, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.
9. Giddens, A. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Cambridge, MA: Polity, 1991.
10. Giddens, A. New Rules of Sociological Method, London: Hutchinson, 1976.=
11. Giddens, A. The Constitution of Society, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1984.
12. Matthews, S. “The Changing Role of the Management Accountant and Its Implications for Qualification Development,” Management Accounting, September 1998.
13. Orlikowski, W. J. “Integrated Information Environment or Matrix of Control? The Contradictory Implications of Information Technologies,” Accounting, Management and Information Technology (1:1), 1991.
14. Orlikowski, W. J. “The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,” Organization Science (3:3), August 1992.
15. Scapens, R.; Jazayeri, M.; and Scapens J. “SAP: Integrated Information Systems and the Implications for Management Accoun-tants,” Management Accounting, September 1998.
16. Smith, M., and Briggs, S. “From Bean-Counter to Action Hero: Changing the Image of the Accountant,” Management Accounting, February, 1999.
17. Walsham, G. Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations, Chichester, England: John Wiley Series in Information Systems, 1993.