Toward understanding the consequences of soil heterogeneity for plant populations and communities

Ecology

Volumn 84, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 2322-2334

  Hutchings, Michael J ^a   John, Elizabeth A ^a   Wijesinghe, Dushyantha K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Belowground competition; Nutrient heterogeneity; Patch scale; Plant competition; Plant growth; Root proliferation; Soil heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS ALLOCATION; HETEROGENEITY; PLANT COMMUNITY; ROOT COMPETITION; ROOT SYSTEM;

EID: 0041611844     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/02-0290     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Alpert, P., and E. L. Simms. 2002. The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evolutionary Ecology 16: 285-297.
2. Alpert, P., and J. F. Stuefer. 1997. Division of labour in clonal plants. Pages 137-154 in H. de Kroon and J. van Groenendael, editors. The ecology and evolution of clonal plants. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
3. Aung, L. G. 1974. Root-shoot relationships. Pages 29-61 in W. Carson, editor. The plant root and its environment. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
4. Birch, C. P. D., and M. J. Hutchings. 1994. Exploitation of patchily distributed soil resources by the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 82:653-664.
5. Blair, B. 2001. Effect of soil nutrient heterogeneity on the symmetry of below-ground competition. Plant Ecology 156:199-203.
6. Bliss, K. M., R. H. Jones, R. J. Mitchell, and P. P. Mou. 2002. Are competitive interactions influenced by spatial nutrient heterogeneity and root foraging behavior? New Phytologist 154:409-417.
7. Cahill, J. F., and B. B. Casper. 1999. Growth consequences of soil nutrient heterogeneity for two old-field herbs, Ambrosia artemisiifolia and Phytolacca americanum grown individually and in combination. Annals of Botany 83:471-478.
8. Cain, M. L., S. Subler, J. P. Evans, and M. J. Fortin. 1999. Sampling spatial and temporal variation in soil nitrogen availability. Oecologia 118:397-404.
9. Caldwell, M. M., J. H. Manwaring, and S. L. Durham. 1991. The microscale distribution of neighboring plant roots in fertile soil microsites. Functional Ecology 5:765-772.
10. Campbell, B. D., J. P. Grime, and J. M. L. Mackey. 1991. A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging. Oecologia 87:532-538.
11. Casper, B. B., and J. F. Cahill. 1996. Limited effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on populations of Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae). American Journal of Botany 83:333-341.
12. Casper, B. B., and J. F. Cahill. 1998. Population level responses to nutrient heterogeneity and density by Abutilon theophrasti (Malvaceae): an experimental neighborhood approach. American Journal of Botany 85:1680-1687.
13. Casper, B. B., J. F. Cahill, and R. B. Jackson. 2000. Plant competition in spatially heterogeneous environments. Pages 111-130 in M. J. Hutchings, E. A. John, and A. J. A. Stewart, editors. The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.
14. Casper, B. B., and R. B. Jackson. 1997. Plant competition underground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:545-570.
15. Casper, B. B., H. J. Schenk, and R. B. Jackson. 2003. Defining a plant's belowground zone of influence. Ecology 84:2313-2321.
16. Collins, B., and G. Wein. 1998. Soil resource heterogeneity effects on early succession. Oikos 82:238-245.
17. Crick, J. C., and J. P. Grime. 1987. Morphological plasticity and mineral nutrient capture in two herbaceous species of contrasted ecology. New Phytologist 107:403-414.
18. Davis, M. A., J. P. Grime, and K. Thompson. 2000. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. Journal of Ecology 88:528-534.
19. Davis, M. A., and M. Pelsor. 2001. Experimental support for a resource-based mechanistic model of invasibility. Ecology Letters 4:421-428.
20. Day, K. J. 2001. Studies of the effects of spatial heterogeneity in nutrient supply on plants and their populations. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
21. Day, K. J., M. J. Hutchings, and E. A. John. 2003. The effects of spatial pattern of nutrient supply on the early stages of growth in plant populations. Journal of Ecology 91:305-315.
22. Einsmann, J. C., R. H. Jones, M. Pu, and R. J. Mitchell. 1999. Nutrient foraging traits in 10 co-occurring plant species of contrasting life forms. Journal of Ecology 87:609-619.
23. Facelli, E., and J. M. Facelli. 2002. Soil phosphorus heterogeneity and mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate plant intra-specific competition and size distribution. Oecologia 133:54-61.
24. Farley, R. A., and A. H. Fitter. 1999. Temporal and spatial variation in soil resources in a deciduous woodland. Journal of Ecology 87:688-696.
25. Fitter, A. H. 1982. Influence of soil heterogeneity on the coexistence of grassland species. Journal of Ecology 70: 139-148.
26. Fitter, A. H., and R. K. M. Hay. 1987. Environmental physiology of plants. Academic Press, London, UK.
27. Fransen, B., and H. de Kroon. 2001. Long-term disadvantages of selective root placement: root proliferation and shoot biomass of two perennial grass species in a 2-year experiment. Journal of Ecology 89:711-722.
28. Fransen, B., H. de Kroon, and F. Berendse. 2001. Soil nutrient heterogeneity alters competition between two perennial grass species. Ecology 82:2534-2546.
29. Gersani, M., J. S. Brown, E. E. O'Brien, G. M. Maina, and Z. Abramsky. 2001. Tragedy of the commons as a result of root competition. Journal of Ecology 89:660-669.
30. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243-1248.
31. Hodge, A., D. Robinson, B. S. Griffiths, and A. H. Fitter. 1999. Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant, Cell and Environment 22:811-820.
32. Huante, P., E. Rincon, and F. S. Chapin III. 1998. Foraging for nutrients, responses to changes in light, and competition in tropical deciduous tree seedlings. Oecologia 117:209-216.
33. Hunt, R., and A. O. Nicholls. 1986. Stress and the coarse control of growth and root-shoot partitioning in herbaceous plants. Oikos 47:149-158.
34. Huston, M. A. 1999. Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86:393-401.
35. Hutchings, M. J., and H. de Kroon. 1994. Foraging in plants: the role of morphological plasticity in resource acquisition. Advances in Ecological Research 25:159-238.
36. Hutchings, M. J., and D. K. Wijesinghe. 1997. Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 12:390-394.
37. Jackson, R. B., and M. M. Caldwell. 1996. Integrating resource heterogeneity and plant plasticity: modelling nitrate and phosphate uptake in a patchy soil environment. Journal of Ecology 84:891-903.
38. Jackson, R. B., J. H. Manwaring, and M. M. Caldwell. 1990. Rapid physiological adjustment of roots to localised soil enrichment. Nature 344:58-60.
39. Kleb, H., and S. Wilson. 1997. Vegetation effects on soil resource heterogeneity in prairie and forest. American Naturalist 150:283-298.
40. Leyser, O., and A. H. Fitter. 1998. Roots are branching out in patches. Trends in Plant Science 3:203-204.
41. Lister, A. J., P. Mou, R. H. Jones, and R. J. Mitchell. 2000. Spatial patterns of soil and vegetation in a 40-year-old slash pine (Pinus elliottii) forest in the coastal plain of South Carolina, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 689-699.
42. Mordelet, P., S. Barot, and L. Abbadie. 1996. Root foraging strategies and soil patchiness in a humid savanna. Plant and Soil 182:171-176.
43. Mou, P., R. H. Jones, R. J. Mitchell, and B. Zutter. 1995. Spatial distribution of roots in sweetgum and loblolly pine monocultures and relations with above-ground biomass and soil nutrients. Functional Ecology 9:689-699.
44. Müller, I., B. Schmid, and J. Weiner. 2000. The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plant, Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 3:115-127.
45. Novoplansky, A., and D. E. Goldberg. 2001. Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plants. Journal of Vegetation Science 12:199-208.
46. Oborny, B. 1994. Growth rules in clonal plants and predictability of the environment: a simulation study. Journal of Ecology 82:341-351.
47. Pacala, S. W., and D. Tilman. 1994. Limiting similarity in mechanistic and spatial models of plant competition in heterogeneous environments. American Naturalist 143:222-257.
48. Robinson, D. 1994. The responses of plants to non-uniform supplies of nutrients. New Phytologist 127:635-674.
49. Robinson, D. 1996. Resource capture by localized root proliferation: why do plants bother? Annals of Botany 77:179-183.
50. Schwinning, S., and J. Weiner. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113:447-455.
51. Stuefer, J. F., H. de Kroon, and H. J. During. 1996. Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by spatial division of labour in a clonal plant. Functional Ecology 10:328-334.
52. Stuefer, J. F., H. J. During, and H. de Kroon. 1994. High benefits of clonal integration in two stoloniferous species, in response to heterogeneous light environments. Journal of Ecology 82:511-518.
53. Wijesinghe, D. K., and M. J. Hutchings. 1997. The effects of spatial scale of environmental heterogeneity on the growth of a clonal plant: an experimental study with Glechoma hederacea. Journal of Ecology 85:17-28.
54. Wijesinghe, D. K., and M. J. Hutchings. 1999. The effects of environmental heterogeneity on the performance of Glechoma hederacea: the interactions between patch contrast and patch scale. Journal of Ecology 87:860-872.
55. Wijesinghe, D. K., E. A. John, S. Beurskens, and M. J. Hutchings. 2001. Root system size and precision in nutrient foraging: responses to spatial pattern of nutrient supply in six herbaceous species. Journal of Ecology 89:972-983.
56. Wilson, S. D. 2000. Heterogeneity, diversity and scale in plant communities. Pages 53-70 in M. J. Hutchings, E. A. John, and A. J. A. Stewart, editors. The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Blackwell Science, Oxford, UK.