Competitiveness and the convergence of international business practice: North American evidence after NAFTA

Global Finance Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 107-122

  Braun, Gary P ^a   Traichal, Patrick A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b Technology House   (United States)

Author keywords

Business practice; Convergence; Market integration; NAFTA

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041595362     PISSN: 10440283     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s1044-0283(99)00009-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Amir E., Harris T., Venuti E. A comparison of value-relevance of U.S. versus non-U.S. GAAP accounting measures using form 20-F reconciliations. J Account Res. 31:1993;230-264.
2. Ammer J., Mei J. Measuring international economic linkages with stock market data. J Fin. 51:1996;1743-1763.
3. Bekaert G., Harvey C. Time-varying world market integration. J Fin. 50:1995;403-444.
4. Choi J.J., Prasad A. Exchange risk sensitivity and its determinants. a firm and industry analysis of U.S. multinationals Fin Manage. 24:1995;77-88.
5. Chung K.H., Pruitt S.W. A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Fin Manage. 23:1994;70-74.
6. Craig C., Douglas S., Grein A. Patterns of convergence and divergence among industrialized nations. 1960-1988 J Int Bus Stud. 23:1992;773-787.
7. Dewenter K.L. Does the market react differently to domestic and foreign takeover announcements? Evidence from the U.S. chemical and retail industries. J Fin Econ. 37:1995;421-441.
8. Errunza V., Senbet L. International corporate diversification, market valuation, and size-adjusted evidence. J Fin. 39:1984;727-743.
9. Errunza V., Losq E. International asset pricing under mild segmentation. theory and test J Fin. 40:1985;105-124.
10. Faught, J. G., Kale, J. R., & Rebello, M. J. (1995). On the relative efficacy of q and other firm quality measures. Working paper, Department of Finance, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
11. Gultekin M., Gultekin N., Penati A. Capital controls and international capital market segmentation. the evidence from the Japanese and American stock markets J Fin. 44:1989;849-869.
12. Hu Y. The international transferability of the firm's advantages. Calif Manage Rev. 37:1995;73-88.
13. Kogut B. Country capabilities and the permeability of borders. Strategic Manage J. 12:1991;33-47.
14. Lindenberg E.B., Ross S.A. Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. J Bus. 54:1981;1-32.
15. Lustgarten S., Thomadakis S. Mobility barriers and Tobin's q. J Bus. 60:1987;519-537.
16. McCallum J. National borders matter. Canada-U.S. regional trade patterns Am Econ Rev. 85:1995;615-623.
17. Morck R., Yeung B. Why investors value multinationality. J Bus. 64:1991;165-187.
18. Pope P. A discussion of a comparison of value-relevance of U.S. versus non-U.S. GAAP accounting measures using form 20-F reconciliations. J Account Res. 31:1993;265-275.
19. Roll R. Industrial structure and the comparative behavior of international stock market indices. J Fin. 47:1992;3-41.
20. Sundaram A., Logue D. Valuation effects of foreign company listings on U.S. exchanges. J Int Bus Stud. 27:1996;67-88.
21. Webb S., Officer D., Boyd B. An examination of international equity markets using American depositary receipts (ADRs). J Bus Fin Account. 22:1995;415-430.