Object-based versus object-centred neglect in reading words

Neurocase

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 203-212

  Savazzi, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Frame of reference; Mental rotation; Mirror; Neglect dyslexia; Object based; Object centred

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CASE REPORT; COGNITION; DYSLEXIA; ERROR; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FEMALE; HUMAN; NEGLECT; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OBJECT RELATION; READING; RETINA; WORD RECOGNITION;

DYSLEXIA; EGO; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERCEPTUAL DISORDERS; READING;

EID: 0041589723     PISSN: 13554794     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1076/neur.9.3.203.15560     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albert ML. A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 1973; 23: 658-64.
2. Behrmann M, Moscovitch M. Object-centred neglect in patients with unilateral neglect: Effects of left-right coordinates of objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1994; 6(1): 1-16.
3. Behrmann M, Moscovitch M, Black SE, Mozer M. Perceptual and conceptual mechanisms in neglect dyslexia. Two contrasting case studies. Brain 1990; 113: 1163-83.
4. Brazzelli M, Capitani E, Della Sala S, Spinnler H, Zuffi M. MODA: Milan Overall Dementia Assessment. Florence: Organizzazioni Speciali, 1994.
5. Buxbaum L, Coslett HB, Montgomery MW, Farah MJ. Mental rotation may underlie apparent object-based neglect. Neuropsychologia 1996; 34: 113-26.
6. Caramazza A, Hillis A. Levels of representation, co-ordinate frames, and unilateral neglect. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990a; 7: 391-445.
7. Caramazza A, Hillis AE. Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature 1990b; 346: 267-9.
8. Chatterjee A. Picturing unilateral spatial neglect: Viewer versus object centred reference frames. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1994; 57(10): 1236-40.
9. Cubelli R, Pugliese M, Gabellini AS. The effect of space location on neglect depends on the nature of the task. Journal of Neurology 1994; 241: 611-4.
10. Diller L, Weinberg J. Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: The evolution of a rational remediation programme. In: Weinstein AE, Friedland RP, editors. Hemi-inattention and Hemispheric Specialization. New York: Raven Press, 1977.
11. Di Pellegrino G, Frassinetti F, Basso G. Coordinate frames for naming misoriented chimerics: A case study of visuo-spatial neglect. Cortex 1995; 31(4): 767-77.
12. Driver J, Baylis GC, Goodrich SJ, Rafal RD. Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia 1994; 32(11): 1353-65.
13. Driver J, Halligan PW. Can visual neglect operate in object-centred coordinates? Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991; 8: 475-96.
14. Ellis AW, Flude BM, Young AW. "Neglect dyslexia" and the early visual processing of letters in words and non-words. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1987; 4: 439-464.
15. Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y. The bells test: A quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology 1989; 11: 49-54.
16. Gregory R. Mirrors in Mind. Oxford: W.H. Freeman/Spekturm, 1997.
17. Halligan PW, Marshall JC. When two is one: A case study of spatial parsing in visual neglect. Perception 1993; 22: 309-12.
18. Haywood M, Coltheart M. Neglect dyslexia and the early stages of visual word recognition. Neurocase 2000; 6: 33-44.
19. Hillis A, Caramazza A. The effects of attentional deficits on reading and spelling. In: Caramazza A, editor. Cognitive Neuropsychology and Neurolinguistics. Advances in Models of Cognitive Function and Impairment. UK: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1990.
20. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. Deficit to stimulus-centered, letter shape representations in a case of "unilateral neglect". Neuropsychologia 1991; 29: 1223-40.
21. Hillis AE, Caramazza A. A framework for interpreting distinct patterns of hemispatial neglect. Neurocase 1995a; 1: 189-207.
22. Hillis A, Caramazza A. Spatially specific deficits in processing graphemic representations in reading and writing. Brain and Language 1995b; 48: 263-308.
23. Katz RB, Sevush S. Positional dyslexia. Brain and Language 1989; 37: 266-89.
24. Maravita A, Spence C, Sergent C, Driver J. Seeing your own touched hands in a mirror modulates cross-modal interactions. Psychological Science 2002; 13: 350-5.
25. Marr D. Vision. New York: W.H. Freeman, 1982.
26. Nichelli P, Venneri A, Pentore R, Cubelli R. Horizontal and vertical neglect dyslexia. Brain and Language 1993; 44: 264-83.
27. Patterson K, Wilson B. A rose is a rose or a nose: A deficit in initial letter identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990; 7: 447-77.
28. Rapp B, Caramazza A. Spatially determined deficits in letter and word processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991; 8: 275-311.
29. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys G, Cleton P, Fery P. Interaction of attentional and lexical processes in neglect dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1990; 7: 479-517.
30. Sieroff E. Perception of visual letter strings in a case of left neglect: Manipulation of the word form. Brain and Language 1991; 41: 565-89.
31. Tipper SP, Behrmann M. Object-centered not scene-based visual neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance 1996; 22(5): 1261-78.
32. Walker R. Spatial and object-based neglect. Neuroscase 1995; 1: 371-83.
33. Young AW, Newcombe F, Ellis AW. Different impairments contribute to neglect dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1991; 8: 177-91.