Effects of screen size, screen resolution, and display rate on computer-based test performance

Applied Measurement in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 191-205

  Bridgeman, Brent ^a   Lennon, Mary Lou ^a   Jackenthal, Altamese ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0041572919     PISSN: 08957347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324818AME1603_2     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. College Entrance Examination Board. (1986). 10 SATs. New York: Author.
3. de Bruijn, D., de Mul, S., & Van Oostendorp, H. (1992). The influence of screen size and text layout on the study of text. Behaviour and Information Technology, 11(2), 71-78.
4. Dillon, A., Richardson, J., & McKnight, C. (1990). The effects of display size and text splitting on reading lengthy text from screen. Behaviour and Information Technology, 9(3), 215-227.
5. Dyson, M. C., & Haselgrove, M. (2001). The influence of reading speed and line length on the effectiveness of reading from screen. International Journal Human-Computer Studies, 54, 585-612.
6. Haas, C. (1996). Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Haas, C., & Hayes, J. R. (1985). Effects of text display variables on reading tasks: Computer screen vs. hard copy. (Carnegie Mellon University Rep. No. CDC-TR3). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
8. Muter, P. (1996). Interface design and optimization of reading of continuous text. In H. van Oostendorp & S. de Mul (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 161-180). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9. Schwarz, E., Beldie, I. P., & Pastoor, S. A. (1983). A comparison of paging and scrolling for changing screen contents by inexperienced users. Human Factors, 25, 279-282.