Proposal of an index to evaluate visual fatigue induced during visual display terminal tasks

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 305-321

  Murata, Atsuo ^a   Uetake, Atsushi ^b   Otsuka, Miho ^b   Takasawa, Yosuke ^b  

^a HIROSHIMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b SEKISUI CHEMICAL CO LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER TERMINALS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

HEAD MOVEMENTS; LIGHTING ENVIRONMENT; LUMINOUS INTENSITY; MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASURES; PUPIL DIAMETER; VIDEO DISPLAY TERMINALS; VISUAL DISPLAY TERMINALS;

EYE MOVEMENTS;

EID: 0041571149     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327590IJHC1303_2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Backs, R. W., & Walrath, L. C. (1992). Eye movement and pupillary response indices of mental workload during visual search of symbolic displays. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 243-254.
2. Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing, load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 276-292.
3. Beatty, J., & Kahneman, D. (1966). Pupillary changes in two memory tasks. Psychonomic Sciences, 5, 371-372.
4. Charman, W. N., & Heron, G. (1988). Fluctuations in accommodation: A review, Ophthalmological and Physiological Optics, 8, 153-164.
5. Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1977). Regression analysis by examples. New York: Wiley.
6. Geacintov, T., & Peavler, W. S. (1974). Pupillography in industrial fatigue assessment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 213-216.
7. Grandjean, E.(1987). Ergonomics in computerized office (1st ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
8. Grandjean, E. (1990). Fitting the task to the man - A textbook of occupational ergonomics (4th ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
9. Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science, 140, 1190-1192.
10. Kahneman, D., & Beatty, J. (1967). Pupillary response in a pitch-discrimination task. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 101-105.
11. Libby, W. L., Lacy, B. L., & Lacy, J. I. (1973). Pupillary and cardiac activity during visual attention. Psychophysiology, 20, 270-294.
12. Lowenstein, O., Feinberg, R., & Lowenfeld, L E. (1963). Pupillary movement during acute and chronic fatigue. Investigative Ophthalmology, 2, 138-157.
13. Marek, T., & Noworol, C. (1986). Mental fatigue of VDU operators induced by monotonous and various tasks. In B. Knave and P.-G. Wideback (Eds.), Work with visual display units 86 (pp. 745-755). New York: Elsevier.
14. Murata, A. (1997). Assessment of fatigue by pupillary response. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences, 8)-A, 7, 1318-1323.
15. Östberg, O. (1980). Accommodation and visual fatigue in display work. In E. Grandjean & E. Vigliani (Eds.), Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals (pp. 41-52). New York: Taylor & Francis.
16. Poock, G. K. (1973). Information processing vs. pupil diameter. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 37, 1000-1002.
17. Schmidt, D., Abel, L. A., Dell'Osso, L. F., & Daroff, R. B. (1979). Saccadic velocity characteristics: Intrinsic variability and fatigue. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine, 4, 393-395.
18. Smith, W.J. (1979). A review of literature relating to visual fatigue. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 23rd annual meeting (pp. 362-366). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
19. Takeda, T., Fukui, Y., & lida, T. (1988). Three-dimensional optometer. Applied Optics, 27, 2595-2602.
20. Takeda, T., Fukui, Y., lida, T., & Karasuyama, K. (1985). An overview measurement apparatus for accommodation ability change caused by VDT work. Ophthalmological Optices of Japan, 6, 59-66.